Interim Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 86 CC NI ACT / 10105/2026 MS METRO POWER PROJECTS
THROUGH ITS PARTNER SH AJEET SINGH TOMER Vs. SH
CHAKRAMOHAN RAJESH YADAV
08.04.2026
There is pendency of more than 36,000 cases in the present court, therefore, it is not
possible to give shorter date in the cases.
Present : Sh. Samarth Talwar, Ld. Counsel for complainant.
A perusal of the file reveals that cheques bearing no. 432735, 432736,
432739 and 432740 were issued on 20.11.25, 21.11.25, 29.11.25 and 29.11.25
respectively. The same were returned on 25.11.25, 25.11.25, 01.12.25 and 01.12.25
respectively with the comment ‘funds insufficient’. The legal demand notice was sent
on 11.12.25 (the day on which the return memo is received is excluded for the purposes
of calculating the period of limitation for sending the legal demand notice within 30
days). The legal demand notice was delivered on 15.12.25. The present complaint came
to be filed on28.01.26. The same appears to be within the period of limitation.
Pre-summoning evidence by way of affidavit and other annexed
documents perused. This court finds sufficient material to proceed ahead with the case
at hand. I take cognizance of the offence punishable u/s 138 NI Act.
Following the law laid down in
A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of
Maharashtra & Anr.” (2014) 11 SCC 790, complaint, pre-summoning evidence by way
of affidavit and other documents considered. In view of the same, there are sufficient
grounds for proceeding further against accused CHAKRAMOHAN RAJESH YADAV,
for offence punishable under Section 138 N. I. Act. I hereby summon the said accused
person.
Ahlmad is hereby directed to issue summons against the accused
persons on filing of P.F./R.C./Approved Courier as well as through e mail ID and
whatsapp number of accused persons on furnishing of the correct e mail ID and
whatsapp Number of the accused persons by the complainant. The complainant is at
liberty to get the summons served through all permissible modes including electronic
and dasti.
The process server is directed to serve the summons by way of
affixation in terms of section 65 CrPC (section 67 of BNSS, 2023), if premises found
closed or same could not be served personally or on any adult male member.
Further, the complainant is to file an affidavit to the effect that the
service of summons has been effected via e mail and/or whatsapp number of the
accused. The affidavit is to be annexed along with certificate u/s 65 B of Indian
Evidence Act (section 63 of BSA, 2023). A digital copy of screenshot of such service
be necessarily attached with a report on summons.
As per the guidelines laid down in Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayyed
Baba Lal H12, Ahlmad is directed to make a mention on the summons issued against the
accused that “accused can make an application for compounding of the offence at the
first and second hearing of the case and if such an application is made compounding
may be allowed by the court without imposing any cost on the accused.”
The Ahlmad is directed to mention the official email Id and video
conferencing link of this Court on the summons. Complainant is directed to file PF and
take steps within 4 weeks including providing copy(ies) of complaint. Matter be fixed
for appearance of accused and framing of notice on 21.07.26.
(Anjali Singh)
JMFC (NI Act) – 03/PHC/ND/08.04.2026
12 (2010) 5 SCC 663
-- 1 of 1 --