Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 23

CNR DLND02008486202401 Sept 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 23 · 01 Sept 2026 · CNR DLND020084862024

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 160 CC NI ACT / 7540/2024 Afzal Khan Vs. Waseem Raja / ()
01.09.2026
This court has a pendency of more than 37000 cases. Shorter dates are not given on account
of heavy pendency.
Present: Complainant in person with Ld. Counsel Mr. Aftab Fazil.
Mr. Mohd Shadab Abbasi, Ld. Counsel for the accused with accused.
Matter is fixed for orders on application for correction of clerical errors in the
judgment dated 31.07.2026 and order on the point of cognizance.
Ld. Counsel for complainant had filed the application for correction of
typographical errors in the judgment dated 31.07.2026 wherein the accused was convicted.
The specific typographical errors pointed out by the Ld. Counsel for complainant are:-
a In paragraph no.3, the bank details of the accused are mentioned as
“Canara Bank, Srinivaspuri, New Delhi” while the correct bank details of the accused as per
cheque are “Axis Bank Ltd., Shahdara, Delhi”.
b In paragraph no.13, the date of cheque is mentioned as “25.02.2024”
and the date of returning memo is mentioned as “04.03.2024” while the correct date of
cheque in question is “18.12.2023” and the correct date of returning memo is “21.12.2023”.
Further the date of the legal notice is also wrongly mentioned as “26.03.2024” instead of
“06.01.2024”.
c In paragraph no.14, the reason for dishonour of cheque is mentioned
as “drawers’ sign not as per mandate” while the correct reason for dishonour as per the
return memo is “Funds Insufficient”.
This Court has verified the submissions from the record and the clerical errors
pointed out above have been inadvertently included in the judgment. Section 362 of CrPC
prohibits the alteration or review of a judgment except to correct a clerical or arithmetical
error. The errors pointed out in the judgment are merely clerical in nature. Accordingly, the
application filed by the complainant stands allowed.
Let the judgment be corrected and altered to the limited effect of including the
aforementioned clerical changes. The copy of the amended judgment be uploaded and also
be furnished to the convict free of cost.
Vide separate order on sentence, the convict Waseem Raja, is sentenced to
pay a fine of Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs Only) to the complainant within 40 days
from the date of pronouncement of this order on sentence. It is further directed that in default
of payment of the above stated fine, the convict shall undergo simple imprisonment in
default of payment of fine for 02 Months.
Put up for execution of sentence on 14.10.2026.
(Akanksha Singh)
JMFC(NIAct)/02/PHC
NDD-ND-01.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.