Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 21

CNR DLND02004389202109 Sept 2024
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 21 · 09 Sept 2024 · CNR DLND020043892021

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 31 CC NI ACT 1911-2021 RANJEETA YADAV, PROPRIETOR, M-S STAR GROUP Vs.
BABLU KUMAR CHAUDHARY -0 ()
Proceedings conducted through video conferencing via Cisco Webex App.
09.09.2024
Present : Sh.M.K.Sethi, ld. Counsel for the complainant.
Sh.Rahil Ahmed, ld. Proxy counsel for the accused.
The layers and Email ID of the Court are not working today.
It is submitted by ld. Counsel for the complainant that their application under
Section 311 CrPC was allowed by Hon’ble High Court of Delhi and opportunity was given to
reopen the examination of CW1. Ld. Proxy counsel seeks pass over till 2 PM and accordingly,
pass over till 2 PM.
At 02 : 10 PM
Present : None for the complainant.
Sh.Arhum Sayeed, ld. LAC for the accused with accused.
Ld. Counsel for accused has placed copy of order dt.12.07.2024 passed by Delhi
High Court in CRL.M.C9418-2023, wherein application filed by the complainant under Section
311 CrPC is allowed subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the accused side. As per the order,
the cost had to be paid to the accused side within 02 weeks from the date of the order.
It is submitted by Ld. LAC that no cost has been paid by the complainant side till
date.
Be awaited for ld. Counsel for the complainant.
At 02 : 30 PM
Present : Sh.Sachin, ld. Proxy counsel for the complainant.
Sh.Arhum Sayeed, ld. LAC for the accused with accused.
(BHARTI BENIWAL)
JMFC (NI ACT) DIGITAL COURT 01
PHC NEW DELHI – 09.09.2024
-- 1 of 2 --
Adjournment is sought by ld. Proxy counsel for the complainant on the ground that
witness has to leave the court premises on account of personal exigency. Same is allowed for
today only.
Ld. Proxy counsel has handed over one DD No.468542 dt.02.09.2024 for an
amount of Rs.5,000/- to ld. LAC for accused.
Ld. LAC for the accused has objected to the same. It is submitted by him that
name/details on the DD has wrongly been mentioned and in view of the incorrect details, the
demand draft would not be cleared by the concerned bank.
Record perused. This court is in agreement with the submissions made by ld. LAC
for accused and accordingly, the said Demand draft has returned to the ld. Proxy counsel for the
complainant.
It is hereby clarified that last and final opportunity is given to the complainant to
comply with the directions passed by Delhi High Court.
List the matter for cross examination of CW1 on 15.10.2024 at 10 : 30 AM.
(BHARTI BENIWAL)
JMFC (NI ACT) DIGITAL COURT 01
PHC NEW DELHI – 09.09.2024
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.