Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: --1--
20 Ct Cases / 33/2026 BIBI CHUNNI Vs. AKASH HET SINGH /0
(R.K. Puram)
11.03.2026
Present: Ld. counsel for complainant.
Complainant in person.
Complainant has levelled oral allegations against EO
that he had misbehaved with her in police station yesterday and had
also taken from her certain original documents which were eventually
returned to her when she made a call on 100 number.
Complainant has been apprised that she is at liberty to
avail legal remedies available to her by filing a written complaint in
this regard.
ATR not filed.
Let BW in the sum of Rs. 5000/- be issued against EO
through DCP concerned for next date of hearing.
List the matter for further proceedings on 03.06.2026.
(SIDDHANT SIHAG)
ACJM-02/New Delhi District/PHC
11.03.2026
At 12.15 P.M.
At this stage, EO SI Sachin has appeared in Court and
has filed ATR. He has further submitted that complainant is in
possession of certain original documents, which are required for
further enquiry and has sought directions that complainant be
immediately directed to handover the same to him. EO has shown
contd...
SIDDHANT
SIHAG
Digitally signed
by SIDDHANT
SIHAG
Date:
2026.03.11
17:45:09
+0530
-- 1 of 2 --
--2--
extreme urgency qua aforementioned documents and has prayed that
the instant matter be taken up again. Matter is hereby taken up again
and ATR is taken on record.
On enquiry, EO submits that he could not appear in
Court when the matter was taken up as the instant matter was not
being reflected in today's cause list.
At this stage, Reader of this Court has informed that
instant matter is duly reflected in today's cause list.
EO has now submitted that he was in PS and was not
feeling well. Submissions of EO do not inspire confidence.
Considering the extreme urgency shown by EO, it
remains unexplained as to why was EO not present in Court when the
matter was taken up for hearing and complainant was present in
Court. No satisfactory response has been furnished by EO in this
regard.
The aspects raised by EO could have been easily
addressed today in the presence of complainant. Prayer raised by EO
that matter be taken up again and the complainant in her absence is
unwarranted and has led to wastage of precious judicial time. On
account of aforementioned, a cost of Rs. 100/- is imposed on EO.
Copy of this order be sent to DCP concerned to deduct the
aforementioned cost from the salary of EO and deposit the same in
Court on NDOH.
Put up on date already fixed i.e. 03.06.2026.
(SIDDHANT SIHAG)
ACJM-02/New Delhi District/PHC
11.03.2026
SIDDHANT
SIHAG
Digitally signed
by SIDDHANT
SIHAG
Date:
2026.03.11
17:45:21
+0530
-- 2 of 2 --