Interim Order 2

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev / 699/2025
STATE Vs. NAVEEN RATHEE
27.01.2026
Present: Dr. Raj Rani, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Respondent is stated to be expired.
Notice sent to respondent Naveen Rathee received back
with the report that respondent has expired. Same be taken on record.
It is submitted on behalf of State that due to some
typographical error while drafting the appeal, name of accused Satbir
Singh Rathee and Bala Rathee were not incorporated in Memo of Parties
as respondents, however, the impugned order was passed in their favour
by the Ld. Trial Court while discharging them. It is further stated that
accused Naveen Rathee had already expired prior to passing of impugned
order. It is submitted that one opportunity may be granted to the State to
file amended Memo of Parties. Heard. Record perused.
The submissions of Ld. Addl. PP for the State was found as
correct. The present appeal has been preferred by the State against
accused Satbir Singh Rathee and Bala Rathee who were discharged by
the Ld. Trial Court vide impugned order.
Let amended Memo of Parties be filed within 07 working
days from today and notice be issued to accused Satbir Singh Rathee and
Bala Rathee as respondents, on NDOH.
Copy of appeal be sent alongwith notice.
Re-list for 24.04.2026.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
27.01.2026
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
At this stage, Ld. Addl. PP for the State has moved an
application for filing of amended Memo of Parties. Same be taken on
record.
Re-list for 24.04.2026 (date already fixed).
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
27.01.2026
-- 2 of 2 --