RAMESH CHANDER GUPTAVsDINKAR

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 596/25
RAMESH CHANDER GUPTA Vs. DINKAR
19.02.2026
Present: Mr. Arun Kumar Verma, Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Summons issued to defendant received back
unserved with the report that ‘no such person is residing on the
given address’.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff that
defendant is residing on the address which is available on record
and he is deliberately avoiding the process of the law.
Considering the submissions, let once again
summons be issued to the defendant on filing of PF as well as
affidavit regarding the correctness of the address of the
defendant.
Summons be also served by way of affixation if JD
is not found at the available given address.
To come up for further proceedings on 26.05.2026.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
19.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 5975/2025
Ramesh Chander Gupta Vs. Dinkar
24.11.2025
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be
checked and registered.
Present: Mr. Arun Kumar Verma, Mr. Rajinder Singh & Mr.
Mahesh Chand, Ld. Counsels for the plaintiff.
Heard. Record perused.
On filing of PF & RC, issue summons of the suit
upon the defendant through all permissible modes including
WhatsApp for 19.02.2026. Steps be taken by plaintiff within a
week.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
24.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 596/25
RAMESH CHANDER GUPTA Vs. DINKAR
26.05.2026
Present: Mr. Arun Kumar Verma, ld. counsel for plaintiff
through VC.
Summons issued to defendant received back
unserved with report that no one met at the given address. It is
submitted by ld. counsel for plaintiff that defendant is
deliberately avoiding the process of court and the address of
defendant mentioned in the present suit is the same address which
defendant himself has mentioned in another suit titled between
the same parties bearing Suit No.414/2020.
Considering the submission, let fresh summons be
issued upon defendant on filing of PF & RC for 03.08.2026. In
case no one is found available at the given address or refuses to
receive summons, summons be served by way of affixation.
Process be filed within a week.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
26.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 596/25
RAMESH CHANDER GUPTA Vs. DINKAR
19.02.2026
Present: Mr. Arun Kumar Verma, Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Summons issued to defendant received back
unserved with the report that ‘no such person is residing on the
given address’.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff that
defendant is residing on the address which is available on record
and he is deliberately avoiding the process of the law.
Considering the submissions, let once again
summons be issued to the defendant on filing of PF as well as
affidavit regarding the correctness of the address of the
defendant.
Summons be also served by way of affixation if JD
is not found at the available given address.
To come up for further proceedings on 26.05.2026.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
19.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 5975/2025
Ramesh Chander Gupta Vs. Dinkar
24.11.2025
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be
checked and registered.
Present: Mr. Arun Kumar Verma, Mr. Rajinder Singh & Mr.
Mahesh Chand, Ld. Counsels for the plaintiff.
Heard. Record perused.
On filing of PF & RC, issue summons of the suit
upon the defendant through all permissible modes including
WhatsApp for 19.02.2026. Steps be taken by plaintiff within a
week.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
24.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --