Interim Order 13

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 28 CS (COMM.) 5781/24
SUMIT RAJ PRAJAPATI VS. JITENDRA KUMAR MEHTA AND
OTHERS
26.09.2025 (At 01:07 PM)
Present: Sh. Prithu Garg, ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Aditya Sharma, ld. counsel for defendants no.1 to 4.
Ms. Ananya Singhal, ld. counsel for defendant no.5.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff has no objection, if delay in filing
WS on behalf of defendants no.1 to 4 be condoned. The said delay is
not more than 120 days from the date of service. In these
circumstances, WS of defendants no.1 to 4 is taken on record and
delay is condoned.
Ld. counsel for defendants no.1 to 4 seeks opportunity to
tender cost as per last date, by next date of hearing.
Ld. counsel for defendants no.1 to 4 and ld. counsel for
plaintiff have given their separate respective statements, according to
which defendants no.1 to 4 shall not use the name of firm “Jitendra
Kumar & Co.” as well as property of this firm and relief sought by
plaintiff in the present suit for the purpose of injunctions, stands
satisfied with such undertaking given on behalf of defendants no.1 to
4.
There are, however, other issues between the parties
related to rendition of account, recovery of amount etc. Both ld.
counsels are willing to take instructions from their respective clients
to look for settlement, stating that they need specific instructions from
their client.
Let all parties appear in person physically before this
court on next date. Put up on 20.11.2025.
(Pulastya Pramachala)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/26.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --