SAROJ KUMARIVsSUNIL KUMAR

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 01/2022
Saroj Kumar vs Sunil Kumar
26.08.2025
Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
Present: None for plaintiff.
Defendant Sunil Kumar in person.
Sh.Ashwani Kumar, proxy Counsel for respondent.
Put up for arguments on 16.09.2025.
(Anju Bajaj Chandna)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts
ND/26.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/2022
Saroj Kumari vs Sunil Kumar
12.08.2025
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Rishab Kumar (through VC), Ld. Proxy Counsel for Sh. Varun
Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant submits that main Counsel Sh.
Varun Kumar could not appear today due to bereavement in his close relation
and he accordingly seeks short adjournment.
Request allowed.
Now to come up on 26.08.2025 for arguments.
(Virender Kumar Bansal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/12.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/2022
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
08.07.2025
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant in person whereas his counsel Sh. Varun
Kashyap, has joined through VC.
Evidence of DW-1 by way of affidavit filed. Same is
taken on record.
DW2 examined and discharged.
Now to come up on 12.08.2025 for arguments.
(Virender Kumar Bansal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/08.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No.1/2022
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
20.05.2025
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the defendant,
through VC whereas Sh. Sunil Kumar, defendant, is
present in person.
Sh. Ghanshyam Sharma, Ld. Counsel for KTC India
Limited, through VC.
No witness present. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
submitted that he has not to put any question to DW2. But, as
DW2 is not present today, hence, he could not be discharged after
bringing on record that no question shall be put to him. The other
two defence witnesses be summoned for the next date of hearing.
Summons of the witnesses be given dasti to the
defendant. Now to come up on 08.07.2025 for DE.
(Virender Kumar Bansal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/20.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No.01/2022
Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
14.01.2025
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant in person alongwith Sh. Varun Kashyap
and Sh. Rishabh Kumar, Ld. Counsels.
Sh. Ghanshyam Sharma, Ld. counsel for witness
KTC India Ltd.
DW-2 Sh. Adil Khan, AR for the witness, KTC
India Limited, examined in chief. However, his cross
examination is deferred at the request of Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff.
The remaining witness, if any, be called on the next
date of hearing on filing of PF/RC.
List the matter on 04.03.2025 for DE.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/14.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 1-22
Saroj Kumari vs. Sunil Kumar
03.12.2024
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
with plaintiff through VC.
Sh. Varun Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
along with Defendant Sunil Kumar.
No DW is present rather one Mr. Ghanshyam
Sharma, Ld. Counsel for witness KTC India Ltd has joined
through VC saying that requisite details were not furnished in
time to the witness that is why the witness is not present today.
Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma further says that he is authorized to
represent KTC India Ltd and ensure that witness be produced on
the NDOH.
In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the case
stands adjourned for DE for the NDOH.
Put up for DE on 14.01.2025.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/03.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/2022
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
08.10.2024
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant in person along with Sh. Amit Kumar,
Ld. Counsel.
Sh. Ghanshyam Sharma, Ld. Counsel for witness
KTC India Ltd., along with Sh. Santosh Kumar Ray,
AR of witness KTC India Ltd.
An application U/s.151 CPC is filed on behalf of the
defendant. Copy provided to the opposite side.
At the request of both the parties, list the matter on
03.12.2024 for DE.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/08.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/22
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
10.09.2024
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar and Mr. Pravin Kumar, Ld.
Counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff in person.
Defendant in person along with Mr. Rishab Kumar.
No PW is present despite the fact that service is
there to KTC, a Transport Company through its owner Mr.
Dheshraj Singh. The endorsement on the process reflects that
process was received by one Mr. Santosh. The absence compels
court to issue coercive measures. Accordingly, fresh process be
issued, subject to filing of PF and along with that notice under
Order 16 Rule 12 CPC be issued qua Santosh, who has received
the notice.
List the matter for DE on 08.10.2024.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/10.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/22
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
30.07.2024
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar and Sh. Akhileshwar Jha,
Ld. Counsels for plaintiff.
Defendant in person along with Sh. Varun
Kashyap, Ld. Counsel.
DW-1 Sh. Sunil Kumar is cross examined and
discharged.
In compliance of order dated 09.07.2024,
whereby cost of Rs.5000/- was imposed upon the defendant to be
deposited with DLSA and Lawyers Welfare Fund, PHC, ND,
receipts of Rs.2500/- each have been filed by Ld. Counsel for the
defendant qua its deposition. Same are taken on record.
An application U/s.151 CPC is filed on behalf of
the defendant for calling of the remaining witnesses. Same is
taken on record. Copy provided to the opposite side, subject to
the list of witnesses reflecting their names, the witnesses be
called on filing of PF/DM.
List the matter for remaining DE on 10.09.2024.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/30.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 1/22
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
09.07.2024
Present : Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
Proxy Counsel for defendant.
Heard. File perused.
Initially, proxy counsel for defendant has sought
passover as witness
i.e. defendant Sh. Sunil Kumar was stated to
be on the way, for his examination as DW but Proxy Counsel for
defendant now
i.e. at 11:30 a.m., informed that the defendant
would not be able to make it today and hence, he seeks
adjournment, despite the fact that the Court offered him to take
another chance today itself.
In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the case
stands adjourned for DE subject to cost of Rs.5000/-, out of
which Rs.2500/- each shall be deposited with DLSA and
Lawyers Welfare Fund, PHC, New Delhi.
Put up for DE on 30-7-2024.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/09.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/2022
Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
07.05.2024
Ld. Presiding Officer is on leave.
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with
plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for defendant with
defendant.
As per directions of the Ld. Presiding Officer, list
the matter on 09.07.2024 for the purpose already fixed.
(Ahlmad)
07.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/2022
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
09.04.2024
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rishabh Kumar, Proxy Counsel for the
defendant.
Evidence by way of affidavit filed on behalf of the
defendant. Copy provided to the opposite party.
DW-1 Sunil Kumar in person who tendered his
affidavit in evidence. Since the copy of the affidavit was not
furnished in advance, therefore, at the request of Ld. counsel for
the plaintiff, his cross examination is deferred.
List on 07.05.2024 for DE.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/09.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/22
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
19.03.2024
Present : Plaintiff in person with counsel Sh. Pradeep Kumar.
Defendant through Sh. Rishabh Kumar, proxy
counsel on behalf of Sh. Kautilya.
Admission/denial of documents is carried out
wherein four documents have been admitted by Mr. Pradeep
Kumar, counsel for the plaintiff, whereas, defendant did not
admit any of the documents in terms of affidavits furnished by
both the sides. Since PE has already been closed, case stands
adjourned for DE for 09.04.2024.
List of witnesses, if any be filed and copy be
furnished to the opposite side.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/19.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/22
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
06.02.2024
Ld. Presiding Officer is on half day leave during the forenoon
session today.
Present : Sh. Shivam Pandey, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Rishabh Kumar, Ld. proxy counsel for
defendant.
As per directions of Ld. Presiding Officer, to come
up for purpose fixed on 19.03.2024.
(Reader)
06.02.2024(m)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/22
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
09.01.2024
Present : Sh. Pardeep Kumar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. proxy counsel for respondent.
Cost of Rs. 10,000/- paid.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that he does not
want to file rejoinder. He submits that he has filed affidavit of
admission/denial of documents.
Respondent is directed to file affidavit regarding
admission/denial of documents within two weeks providing
advance copy to the opposite side.
Put up for admission/denial of
documents/consideration of issues on 06.02.2024.
(Sanjay Garg-I)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/09.01.2024(m)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
CS No. 01/22
05.12.2023
Present : Sh. Pardeep Kumar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff with
plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Kashyap, Ld. counsel for respondent with
respondent.
Heard arguments on the application moved by the
Ld. counsel for the respondent under Section 5 of Limitation Act.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that there is a huge
delay of 5 and ½ months in filing the WS and in the interest of
justice, same may be allowed subject to heavy cost.
Its a suit for recovery of Rs. 5,77,782/-.
In view of the facts and circumstance, application is
allowed subject to cost of Rs. 10,000/-. Written statement is taken
on record.
Ld. counsel for defendant submits that he will
supply the copy of WS to the counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that he wants to file
rejoinder/replication.
Allowed to do so with advance copy to the opposite
side.
Put up for admission/denial of documents and
consideration of issues on 09.01.2024
(Sanjay Garg-I)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/05.12.2023(m)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
CS No. 01/2022
09.11.2023
Present : Plaintiff in person with Sh. Mahendra Singh, Proxy
Counsel.
Sh. Varun Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff files reply to the
application moved by Ld. Counsel for the defendant. Copy given.
Ld. Proxy Counsel request for adjournment stating
that main counsel is not available. Adjournment allowed.
Put-up on 05.12.2023 for arguments.
(Sanjay Garg-I)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/09.11.2023(mc)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
CS No. 01/2022
10.10.2023
Present: Sh. Devender Singh, proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff seeks
adjournment to file reply. Not satisfied with reasons given.
Adjournment allowed with direction to file the same
before the next date of hearing providing advance copy to the
opposite party.
Put-up on 09.11.2023 for arguments.
(Sanjay Garg-I)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/10.10.2023(mc)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
CS No. 01/2022
19.09.2023
Present:- Plaintiff in person with Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld.
Counsel.
Defendant in person with Sh. Varun Kashyap, Ld.
Counsel.
PW-1 Smt. Saroj Kumari examined and discharged.
The plaintiff closes PE.
Defendant has filed written statement along with an
application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking
condonation of delay. Copy given to Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
He submits that this application is not maintainable
since vide order dated 01.08.2023, the court has closed the defence
of the defendant. He submits that he want to file reply to this
application with advance copy to the opposite party.
Put-up for arguments on this application on
10.10.2023.
(Sanjay Garg-I)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/19.09.2023 (mc)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
CS No.01/2022
01.08.2023
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate for the plaintiff.
Defendant in person with Sh. Rishabh Kumar,
Advocate.
He files written statement. Opposed by Ld. Counsel
for the plaintiff stating that defendant is filing written statement
after lapse of more than 90 days after service and the same is not
permissible under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC.
As per record on 11.04.2023, Ld. Counsel for the
defendant had sought more time to file written statement. From
11.04.2023, it is more than 90 days when defendant is filing written
statement thereby same cannot be taken on record. Accordingly, it’s
taken as if defendant had not taken any defence to contest this
matter.
Accordingly, putup for PE on 19.09.2023.
(Sanjay GargI)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/01.08.2023 (mc)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Guncha Sara Vs. State, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
GP No.03/2023
01.08.2023
Present : Sh. Rajesh Kalia, Advocate for the petitioner, through
V.C.
Sh. Neeraj Aggarwal, Advocate for R1.
Sh. Harsh Vardhan Singh, Advocate for R2.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner request for an
adjournment stating that the petitioner is away to US and will come
back in mid September, 2023. Not opposed by any party.
Accordingly, putup for evidence on 09.10.2023,
last opportunity.
(Sanjay GargI)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/01.08.2023 (mc)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 01/22
06.06.2023
Present: Sh. Pravin Kumar, Advocate for plaintiff.
D2 along with Sh. Rishabh Kumar, Advocate.
Since, Ld. Presiding Officer has been elevated to the
Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide order no. 9667/Estt.I/EII/DHC
dated 16.05.2023, the matter is adjourned.
As per directions, put up for further proceedings on
01.08.2023.
Reader/06.06.2023.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 01/22
Saroj Kumari v Sunil Kumar
11.04.2023
Present: Sh. Pravin Kumar, Advocate for plaintiff.
Ms. Shaweta Dixit, Advocate for defendant.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant requests some more time
to file the Written Statement. Not opposed.
Now to come up for filing of Written Statement,
documents, admission/denial of the documents, for which the
parties shall appear in person, on 06.06.2023.
(Dharmesh Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/11.04.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 01/22
Saroj Kumari v Sunil Kumar
28.02.2023
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate for plaintiff.
Defendant in person with Sh. Rishabh Kumar,
Advocate.
Summons were taken dasti. Although, no report has
been received back, vakalatnama is filed on behalf of defendant.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant requests that he may be
supplied with the copy and other documents. Let the same be done
within seven days from today.
To come up for filing of the Written Statement on
11.04.2023.
(Dharmesh Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/28.02.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 01/22
Saroj Kumari v. Sunil Kumar
20.12.2022
Present: Sh. Pravin Kumar, Advocate for plaintiff.
Summons were collected dasti but no report has been
received back. It is stated that plaintiff could not execute the
summons due to certain unavoidable personal reasons. Another
opportunity is requested.
Last and final opportunity is given to the plaintiff to
serve the defendant on filing of PF within 30 days by all possible
modes beside dasti returnable by 28.02.2023.
(Dharmesh Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/20.12.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No.1/22
Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
27.09.2022
Present: Sh. Pravin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Steps not taken and PF is not filed.
It is requested that the plaintiff has been able to speak to the
defendant and request is made to issue summons dasti.
Dasti summons allowed on filing of PF within 15 days,
returnable by 20.12.2022.
(Dharmesh Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/27.09.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/22
Saroj Kumari vs. Sunil Kumar
05.07.2022
Present: Sh. Pravin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Steps not taken by the plaintiff as per previous order. It
is stated that the plaintiff is trying to locate the fresh address of
defendant.
Let the fresh address of defendant be located and
plaintiff is directed to file the amended memo of parties with
affidavit on or before the next date of hearing.
Defendant be served at the fresh address, if any, on
filing of PF by all possible modes returnable on 27.09.2022.
(Dharmesh Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/05.07.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 01/22
Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
05.04.2022
Present: Sh. Praveen Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant is yet to be served in the present matter.
As per previous service reports, it appears that the
premises was found locked and there are remarks on the returned
registered envelope that no such person is residing at the premises.
Let the address of the defendant be verified. If there is
any fresh address, the same be filed by way of an amended Memo
of Parties along with an affidavit of the plaintiff. This process be
completed within a month from today.
Summons be issued to the defendant on filing of PF by
all possible modes for 05.07.2022.
(Dharmesh Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/05.04.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/22
Saroj Kumari Vs Sunil Kumar
14.03.2022
Ld. Presiding Officer has been elevated to the Hon'ble High
Court of Delhi vide Notification No. K.13017/01/2021US.I dated
25.02.2022.
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
To come up for further proceedings on 05.04.2022.
Reader/14.03.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No.1/22
Saroj Kumari Vs Sunil Kumar
02.03.2022
Ld. Presiding Officer has been elevated to the Hon'ble High
Court of Delhi vide Notification No. K.13017/01/2021US.I
dated 25.02.2022.
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Summons sent to defendant through ordinary manner
received back with the report of process server “ premises found
locked”. Summons sent through RC/Speed Post/ Courier not
received back.
To come up for further proceedings on 14.03.2022.
Reader/02.03.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No.1/22
Saroj Kumari Vs Sunil Kumar
(Proceedings through Video Conferencing)
01.02.2022
Present: Sh. Praveen Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant not served as steps not taken.
Issue summons in the suit to the defendant on filing of
PF/RC/Speed Post/courier, returnable on 02.03.2022. Let steps be taken
within one week.
(Dinesh Kumar Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/01.02.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 01/22
Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
03.01.2022
(Proceedings through Video Conferencing)
Fresh suit for recovery of Rs.5,77,782/ received. It be checked
and registered.
Present: Sh. Pravin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Heard.
Summons in the suit be issued to the respondent on
filing of PF/RC for 01.02.2022.
(Dinesh Kumar Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/03.01.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 01/2022
Saroj Kumar vs Sunil Kumar
26.08.2025
Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
Present: None for plaintiff.
Defendant Sunil Kumar in person.
Sh.Ashwani Kumar, proxy Counsel for respondent.
Put up for arguments on 16.09.2025.
(Anju Bajaj Chandna)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts
ND/26.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/2022
Saroj Kumari vs Sunil Kumar
12.08.2025
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Rishab Kumar (through VC), Ld. Proxy Counsel for Sh. Varun
Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant submits that main Counsel Sh.
Varun Kumar could not appear today due to bereavement in his close relation
and he accordingly seeks short adjournment.
Request allowed.
Now to come up on 26.08.2025 for arguments.
(Virender Kumar Bansal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/12.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/2022
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
08.07.2025
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant in person whereas his counsel Sh. Varun
Kashyap, has joined through VC.
Evidence of DW-1 by way of affidavit filed. Same is
taken on record.
DW2 examined and discharged.
Now to come up on 12.08.2025 for arguments.
(Virender Kumar Bansal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/08.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No.1/2022
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
20.05.2025
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the defendant,
through VC whereas Sh. Sunil Kumar, defendant, is
present in person.
Sh. Ghanshyam Sharma, Ld. Counsel for KTC India
Limited, through VC.
No witness present. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
submitted that he has not to put any question to DW2. But, as
DW2 is not present today, hence, he could not be discharged after
bringing on record that no question shall be put to him. The other
two defence witnesses be summoned for the next date of hearing.
Summons of the witnesses be given dasti to the
defendant. Now to come up on 08.07.2025 for DE.
(Virender Kumar Bansal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/20.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No.01/2022
Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
14.01.2025
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant in person alongwith Sh. Varun Kashyap
and Sh. Rishabh Kumar, Ld. Counsels.
Sh. Ghanshyam Sharma, Ld. counsel for witness
KTC India Ltd.
DW-2 Sh. Adil Khan, AR for the witness, KTC
India Limited, examined in chief. However, his cross
examination is deferred at the request of Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff.
The remaining witness, if any, be called on the next
date of hearing on filing of PF/RC.
List the matter on 04.03.2025 for DE.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/14.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 1-22
Saroj Kumari vs. Sunil Kumar
03.12.2024
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
with plaintiff through VC.
Sh. Varun Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
along with Defendant Sunil Kumar.
No DW is present rather one Mr. Ghanshyam
Sharma, Ld. Counsel for witness KTC India Ltd has joined
through VC saying that requisite details were not furnished in
time to the witness that is why the witness is not present today.
Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma further says that he is authorized to
represent KTC India Ltd and ensure that witness be produced on
the NDOH.
In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the case
stands adjourned for DE for the NDOH.
Put up for DE on 14.01.2025.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/03.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/2022
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
08.10.2024
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant in person along with Sh. Amit Kumar,
Ld. Counsel.
Sh. Ghanshyam Sharma, Ld. Counsel for witness
KTC India Ltd., along with Sh. Santosh Kumar Ray,
AR of witness KTC India Ltd.
An application U/s.151 CPC is filed on behalf of the
defendant. Copy provided to the opposite side.
At the request of both the parties, list the matter on
03.12.2024 for DE.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/08.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/22
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
10.09.2024
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar and Mr. Pravin Kumar, Ld.
Counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff in person.
Defendant in person along with Mr. Rishab Kumar.
No PW is present despite the fact that service is
there to KTC, a Transport Company through its owner Mr.
Dheshraj Singh. The endorsement on the process reflects that
process was received by one Mr. Santosh. The absence compels
court to issue coercive measures. Accordingly, fresh process be
issued, subject to filing of PF and along with that notice under
Order 16 Rule 12 CPC be issued qua Santosh, who has received
the notice.
List the matter for DE on 08.10.2024.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/10.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/22
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
30.07.2024
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar and Sh. Akhileshwar Jha,
Ld. Counsels for plaintiff.
Defendant in person along with Sh. Varun
Kashyap, Ld. Counsel.
DW-1 Sh. Sunil Kumar is cross examined and
discharged.
In compliance of order dated 09.07.2024,
whereby cost of Rs.5000/- was imposed upon the defendant to be
deposited with DLSA and Lawyers Welfare Fund, PHC, ND,
receipts of Rs.2500/- each have been filed by Ld. Counsel for the
defendant qua its deposition. Same are taken on record.
An application U/s.151 CPC is filed on behalf of
the defendant for calling of the remaining witnesses. Same is
taken on record. Copy provided to the opposite side, subject to
the list of witnesses reflecting their names, the witnesses be
called on filing of PF/DM.
List the matter for remaining DE on 10.09.2024.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/30.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 1/22
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
09.07.2024
Present : Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
Proxy Counsel for defendant.
Heard. File perused.
Initially, proxy counsel for defendant has sought
passover as witness
i.e. defendant Sh. Sunil Kumar was stated to
be on the way, for his examination as DW but Proxy Counsel for
defendant now
i.e. at 11:30 a.m., informed that the defendant
would not be able to make it today and hence, he seeks
adjournment, despite the fact that the Court offered him to take
another chance today itself.
In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the case
stands adjourned for DE subject to cost of Rs.5000/-, out of
which Rs.2500/- each shall be deposited with DLSA and
Lawyers Welfare Fund, PHC, New Delhi.
Put up for DE on 30-7-2024.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/09.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/2022
Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
07.05.2024
Ld. Presiding Officer is on leave.
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with
plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for defendant with
defendant.
As per directions of the Ld. Presiding Officer, list
the matter on 09.07.2024 for the purpose already fixed.
(Ahlmad)
07.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/2022
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
09.04.2024
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rishabh Kumar, Proxy Counsel for the
defendant.
Evidence by way of affidavit filed on behalf of the
defendant. Copy provided to the opposite party.
DW-1 Sunil Kumar in person who tendered his
affidavit in evidence. Since the copy of the affidavit was not
furnished in advance, therefore, at the request of Ld. counsel for
the plaintiff, his cross examination is deferred.
List on 07.05.2024 for DE.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/09.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/22
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
19.03.2024
Present : Plaintiff in person with counsel Sh. Pradeep Kumar.
Defendant through Sh. Rishabh Kumar, proxy
counsel on behalf of Sh. Kautilya.
Admission/denial of documents is carried out
wherein four documents have been admitted by Mr. Pradeep
Kumar, counsel for the plaintiff, whereas, defendant did not
admit any of the documents in terms of affidavits furnished by
both the sides. Since PE has already been closed, case stands
adjourned for DE for 09.04.2024.
List of witnesses, if any be filed and copy be
furnished to the opposite side.
(Vimal Kumar Yadav)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/19.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/22
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
06.02.2024
Ld. Presiding Officer is on half day leave during the forenoon
session today.
Present : Sh. Shivam Pandey, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Rishabh Kumar, Ld. proxy counsel for
defendant.
As per directions of Ld. Presiding Officer, to come
up for purpose fixed on 19.03.2024.
(Reader)
06.02.2024(m)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/22
SAROJ KUMARI Vs. SUNIL KUMAR
09.01.2024
Present : Sh. Pardeep Kumar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. proxy counsel for respondent.
Cost of Rs. 10,000/- paid.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that he does not
want to file rejoinder. He submits that he has filed affidavit of
admission/denial of documents.
Respondent is directed to file affidavit regarding
admission/denial of documents within two weeks providing
advance copy to the opposite side.
Put up for admission/denial of
documents/consideration of issues on 06.02.2024.
(Sanjay Garg-I)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/09.01.2024(m)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
CS No. 01/22
05.12.2023
Present : Sh. Pardeep Kumar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff with
plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Kashyap, Ld. counsel for respondent with
respondent.
Heard arguments on the application moved by the
Ld. counsel for the respondent under Section 5 of Limitation Act.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that there is a huge
delay of 5 and ½ months in filing the WS and in the interest of
justice, same may be allowed subject to heavy cost.
Its a suit for recovery of Rs. 5,77,782/-.
In view of the facts and circumstance, application is
allowed subject to cost of Rs. 10,000/-. Written statement is taken
on record.
Ld. counsel for defendant submits that he will
supply the copy of WS to the counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that he wants to file
rejoinder/replication.
Allowed to do so with advance copy to the opposite
side.
Put up for admission/denial of documents and
consideration of issues on 09.01.2024
(Sanjay Garg-I)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/05.12.2023(m)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
CS No. 01/2022
09.11.2023
Present : Plaintiff in person with Sh. Mahendra Singh, Proxy
Counsel.
Sh. Varun Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff files reply to the
application moved by Ld. Counsel for the defendant. Copy given.
Ld. Proxy Counsel request for adjournment stating
that main counsel is not available. Adjournment allowed.
Put-up on 05.12.2023 for arguments.
(Sanjay Garg-I)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/09.11.2023(mc)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
CS No. 01/2022
10.10.2023
Present: Sh. Devender Singh, proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff seeks
adjournment to file reply. Not satisfied with reasons given.
Adjournment allowed with direction to file the same
before the next date of hearing providing advance copy to the
opposite party.
Put-up on 09.11.2023 for arguments.
(Sanjay Garg-I)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/10.10.2023(mc)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
CS No. 01/2022
19.09.2023
Present:- Plaintiff in person with Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld.
Counsel.
Defendant in person with Sh. Varun Kashyap, Ld.
Counsel.
PW-1 Smt. Saroj Kumari examined and discharged.
The plaintiff closes PE.
Defendant has filed written statement along with an
application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking
condonation of delay. Copy given to Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
He submits that this application is not maintainable
since vide order dated 01.08.2023, the court has closed the defence
of the defendant. He submits that he want to file reply to this
application with advance copy to the opposite party.
Put-up for arguments on this application on
10.10.2023.
(Sanjay Garg-I)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/19.09.2023 (mc)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
CS No.01/2022
01.08.2023
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate for the plaintiff.
Defendant in person with Sh. Rishabh Kumar,
Advocate.
He files written statement. Opposed by Ld. Counsel
for the plaintiff stating that defendant is filing written statement
after lapse of more than 90 days after service and the same is not
permissible under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC.
As per record on 11.04.2023, Ld. Counsel for the
defendant had sought more time to file written statement. From
11.04.2023, it is more than 90 days when defendant is filing written
statement thereby same cannot be taken on record. Accordingly, it’s
taken as if defendant had not taken any defence to contest this
matter.
Accordingly, putup for PE on 19.09.2023.
(Sanjay GargI)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/01.08.2023 (mc)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Guncha Sara Vs. State, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
GP No.03/2023
01.08.2023
Present : Sh. Rajesh Kalia, Advocate for the petitioner, through
V.C.
Sh. Neeraj Aggarwal, Advocate for R1.
Sh. Harsh Vardhan Singh, Advocate for R2.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner request for an
adjournment stating that the petitioner is away to US and will come
back in mid September, 2023. Not opposed by any party.
Accordingly, putup for evidence on 09.10.2023,
last opportunity.
(Sanjay GargI)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi District
Patiala House Courts/ND/01.08.2023 (mc)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 01/22
06.06.2023
Present: Sh. Pravin Kumar, Advocate for plaintiff.
D2 along with Sh. Rishabh Kumar, Advocate.
Since, Ld. Presiding Officer has been elevated to the
Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide order no. 9667/Estt.I/EII/DHC
dated 16.05.2023, the matter is adjourned.
As per directions, put up for further proceedings on
01.08.2023.
Reader/06.06.2023.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 01/22
Saroj Kumari v Sunil Kumar
11.04.2023
Present: Sh. Pravin Kumar, Advocate for plaintiff.
Ms. Shaweta Dixit, Advocate for defendant.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant requests some more time
to file the Written Statement. Not opposed.
Now to come up for filing of Written Statement,
documents, admission/denial of the documents, for which the
parties shall appear in person, on 06.06.2023.
(Dharmesh Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/11.04.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 01/22
Saroj Kumari v Sunil Kumar
28.02.2023
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate for plaintiff.
Defendant in person with Sh. Rishabh Kumar,
Advocate.
Summons were taken dasti. Although, no report has
been received back, vakalatnama is filed on behalf of defendant.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant requests that he may be
supplied with the copy and other documents. Let the same be done
within seven days from today.
To come up for filing of the Written Statement on
11.04.2023.
(Dharmesh Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/28.02.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 01/22
Saroj Kumari v. Sunil Kumar
20.12.2022
Present: Sh. Pravin Kumar, Advocate for plaintiff.
Summons were collected dasti but no report has been
received back. It is stated that plaintiff could not execute the
summons due to certain unavoidable personal reasons. Another
opportunity is requested.
Last and final opportunity is given to the plaintiff to
serve the defendant on filing of PF within 30 days by all possible
modes beside dasti returnable by 28.02.2023.
(Dharmesh Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/20.12.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No.1/22
Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
27.09.2022
Present: Sh. Pravin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Steps not taken and PF is not filed.
It is requested that the plaintiff has been able to speak to the
defendant and request is made to issue summons dasti.
Dasti summons allowed on filing of PF within 15 days,
returnable by 20.12.2022.
(Dharmesh Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/27.09.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/22
Saroj Kumari vs. Sunil Kumar
05.07.2022
Present: Sh. Pravin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Steps not taken by the plaintiff as per previous order. It
is stated that the plaintiff is trying to locate the fresh address of
defendant.
Let the fresh address of defendant be located and
plaintiff is directed to file the amended memo of parties with
affidavit on or before the next date of hearing.
Defendant be served at the fresh address, if any, on
filing of PF by all possible modes returnable on 27.09.2022.
(Dharmesh Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/05.07.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 01/22
Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
05.04.2022
Present: Sh. Praveen Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant is yet to be served in the present matter.
As per previous service reports, it appears that the
premises was found locked and there are remarks on the returned
registered envelope that no such person is residing at the premises.
Let the address of the defendant be verified. If there is
any fresh address, the same be filed by way of an amended Memo
of Parties along with an affidavit of the plaintiff. This process be
completed within a month from today.
Summons be issued to the defendant on filing of PF by
all possible modes for 05.07.2022.
(Dharmesh Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/05.04.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 1/22
Saroj Kumari Vs Sunil Kumar
14.03.2022
Ld. Presiding Officer has been elevated to the Hon'ble High
Court of Delhi vide Notification No. K.13017/01/2021US.I dated
25.02.2022.
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
To come up for further proceedings on 05.04.2022.
Reader/14.03.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No.1/22
Saroj Kumari Vs Sunil Kumar
02.03.2022
Ld. Presiding Officer has been elevated to the Hon'ble High
Court of Delhi vide Notification No. K.13017/01/2021US.I
dated 25.02.2022.
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Summons sent to defendant through ordinary manner
received back with the report of process server “ premises found
locked”. Summons sent through RC/Speed Post/ Courier not
received back.
To come up for further proceedings on 14.03.2022.
Reader/02.03.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No.1/22
Saroj Kumari Vs Sunil Kumar
(Proceedings through Video Conferencing)
01.02.2022
Present: Sh. Praveen Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant not served as steps not taken.
Issue summons in the suit to the defendant on filing of
PF/RC/Speed Post/courier, returnable on 02.03.2022. Let steps be taken
within one week.
(Dinesh Kumar Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/01.02.2022
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 01/22
Saroj Kumari Vs. Sunil Kumar
03.01.2022
(Proceedings through Video Conferencing)
Fresh suit for recovery of Rs.5,77,782/ received. It be checked
and registered.
Present: Sh. Pravin Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Heard.
Summons in the suit be issued to the respondent on
filing of PF/RC for 01.02.2022.
(Dinesh Kumar Sharma)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
New Delhi/03.01.2022
-- 1 of 1 --