Order 9

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 469/23
VIRAT MOHAN Vs. ADITYA BIRLA FINANCE LTD.
10.09.2025
Present: Mr. Mohd. Faizan Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Ms. Ojashvi Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
through VC.
Adjournment is sought on behaf of plaintfff on the
ground that main counsel is out of station. Main counsel has not
appeared through VC. Considering the fact that no satisfactory
reason has been given for seeking adjournment, cost of Rs.2000/-
is imposed upon the plaintiff to be deposited with DLSA.
At this stage Mr. Naval Sabharwal, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff has appeared through VC. From the conduct of ld.
Counsel for plaintiff it appears that plaintiff is only playing
tactics to delay the proceedings and keeping a watch over the
proceedings. No reason is given by ld. Counsel for plaintiff as to
why witness is not available today. Conduct of plaintiff is highly
condemnable. Still in the interest of justice one opportunity is
granted to plaintiff to lead evidence. To come up for PE on
17.09.2025.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
10.09.2025
Contd ….
-- 1 of 2 --
Called again at 12.10 PM
At this stage file taken up on appearance of Mr.
Naman Sabharwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintff. It is submitted by ld.
Counsel for plaintiff that inadvertently due to confusion ld. Proxy
counsel appeared in the morning submitted that main counsel is
out of station. However, the fact was that plaintiff had gone out
of station. Request for waiving of cost is made on behalf of
plaintiff. Considering the fact that plaintiff did not appear to get
his evidence recorded, court is not inclined to waive the cost as is
imposed upon plaintiff in the morning.
Put up on 17.09.2025, date already fixed.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
10.09.2025
-- 2 of 2 --