Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 13

CNR DLND01007169202329 Feb 2024
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 13 · 29 Feb 2024 · CNR DLND010071692023

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Page no.1 of 2
SC No. 295/2023
State v. Tajeem & Ors
FIR No. 165 /2023
P.S Special Cell
29.02.2024
Present: Sh. Irfan Ahmed, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Accused Tajeem and Irshad @ Bhuru produced
from JC.
Sh. Afzal Khan, Sh. Yasir Arafat & Sh. Safuddin
Khan, Ld. Counsels for accused Tajeem.
Sh. A. K. Suri, Ld. Counsel for accused Irshad @
Bhuru.
Today matter is fixed for admission-denial of the
documents and prosecution evidence.
Ld. Counsel for accused Tajeem submits that
accused want to admit document u/s 294 Cr.P.C. Separate
statement of accused is recorded to this effect.
In view of the above statement, accused Tajeem
submits that he has no objection, if the examination of witness
mentioned at serial no.5 of the list of witnesses is dispensed with.
Ld. Addl. PP for State also intends to drop the said witness.
In view of the same, said witness stands dropped
from the list of witnesses. Ahlmad is directed to make
necessary endorsement in the list of witnesses.
Summons issued to PW SI Priyavart received back
served.
A written request received on behaf of the PW SI
Priyavart on the ground that he has gone out of station vide DD
-- 1 of 2 --
Page no.2 of 2
no.90A dated 22.02.2024 for investigation purpose in case FIR
no.46/2024, PS Special Cell and unable to appear in Court.
Heard. Allowed.
PW SI Priyavart be summoned again for next
date of hearing.
PW1 Sh. Kaif, PW2 Sh. Salman & PW3 Sh. Tanveer
are examined-in-chief, cross-examined and discharged.
Issue summons to the witnesses i.e. M.M. Lodi,
Nodal Officer Jio, Nodal Officer Airtel and HC Pawan
Kaushal for next date of hearing.
List for PE on 08.04.2024.
It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the accused
Irshad that application dated 30.01.2024 becomes infructuous as
prayer of the application to summon the witnesses mentioned at
serial no.2 to 4 has already been examined.
In view of the submissions, aforesaid application
stands dismissed as infructuous.
An application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for
granting bail filed on behalf of the accused Irshad and another
application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail filed on
behalf of the accused Tajeem.
Issue notice to the IO to file reply to the abovesaid
applications.
List for reply and arguments on the bail applications
of the accused persons on 21.03.2024.
(Dr. Hardeep Kaur)
ASJ-02, NDD/PHC/New Delhi
29.02.2024
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.