Ace Engineers Bureau Engineers And ContractorsVsMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 25 OMP (COMM) : 233/2024
ACE ENGINEERS BUREAU ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS
VS. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.
10.02.2026
Present : None for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
None has appeared on behalf of parties since morning
despite repeated calls.
In the interest of justice, renotify the matter for
arguments on 21.05.2026.
( DEEPALI SHARMA )
District Judge (Commercial Court)-03
PHC / New Delhi / 10.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 25 OMP (COMM.) 233/24 Ace Engineers Bureau Engineers And
Contractors Vs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND
ANR
04.11.2025
Present : Sh. Jagjit Singh, Ld. Counsel for petitioner (through VC).
Sh. Talib Khan, Ld. Counsel for respondents (through
VC).
Rejoinder to the reply to objections filed u/s. 34 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act has been filed on behalf of petitioner.
Arbitral record received.
Renotify the matter for arguments on the petition on
10.02.2026.
DEEPALI SHARMA
District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi / 04.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) No.233/24
Ace Engineers Bureau Engineers and Contractors v/s Municipal
Corporation of Delhi and Anr
04.09.2025
Present: Sh. Jagjit Singh, Sh. Preet Singh and Sh. Rahul Khan, ld.
counsels for petitioner.
Sh. Talib Khan, ld. counsel for respondent (VC).
Reply received from Branch-In-Charge, Bail and Filing
Section who has stated that as per CIS server, the matter was initially
e-filed on 24.07.2024 with E-filing no. ADL202300144408C
202400006 which was rejected on 26.07.2024 for want of curing
some objections and re-filed on 27.08.2024 which was
verified/approved on 31.08.2024.
Since the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act is challenging the impugned award dated
24.04.2024, the petition having been e-filed on 24.07.2024 is filed on
last day of the third month and is within the period of limitation as
enunciated in Section 34 (3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Let steps be taken for requisition of arbitral record, on
filing of PF, returnable for 04.11.2025.
HEMANI MALHOTRA
District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi / 04.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 32 OMP (COMM.) 233/24 Ace Engineers Bureau Engineers And
Contractors Vs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR
09.07.2025
Present: Sh. Jagjit Singh, ld. counsel for petitioner (VC).
Sh. Talib Khan and Sh. Adnan Khan, ld. counsels for
respondents.
Reply on behalf of respondents filed.
Ld. counsel for petitioner seeks time to file rejoinder.
Steps have not been taken to summon the arbitral record
in compliance of the last order. Be taken within a week.
At this stage, ld. counsel for respondents submits that
report be called from Filing Section as to when present petition was
filed as
prima facie , present petition is barred by limitation.
As per E-courts Website, actual date of filing was
31.08.2024 and according to the petitioner, award was received by
petitioner on 24.04.2024, therefore,
prima facie, Section 34 of
Arbitration and Conciliation Act was filed after a lapse of 120 days.
Considering the submissions, it is imperative that report
be called from Filing Section as to when the present petition was
filed.
Be listed for 04.09.2025.
HEMANI MALHOTRA
District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi / 09.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 233/24 Ace Engineers Bureau Engineers And
Contractors Vs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR
07.04.2025
Present: Sh. Jagjit Singh, ld. Counsel for petitioner (VC).
Sh. Talib Khan,ld. Counsel for respondents.
Ld. Counsel for respondent states that reply to petition
under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act was e-filed on
24.03.2025 and filed physically on 24/25.03.2025. He places on
record application seeking condonation of delay of 37 days in filing
of reply. Advance copy already supplied through email to opposite
side.
Record perused.
It is noted that reply is not on record.
Ahlmad is directed to trace and place the same on record.
Ld. Counsel for respondent states that he will check with
his office too and also raised an objection that petition is barred by
law of limitation.
Be listed for arguments on 09.07.2025.
Arbitral record be requisitioned on filing of PF.
Steps be taken within a week.
VINEETA GOYAL
District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi / 07.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 17 OMP (COMM.) 233/24 Ace Engineers Bureau Engineers And
Contractors Vs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR
21.11.2024
Present: Sh. Jagjit Singh and Sh. Preet Singh, ld. Counsels for
petitioner.
An application u/s. 151 CPC r/w Section 153 CPC
seeking correction of typographical error in para 1 of the objection
petition filed by petitioner.
Heard.
The petitioner has filed instant objection petition for
setting aside award dated 24.04.2024. It is plea of the petitioner that
due to typographical error in para 1 of the petition, it has been
mentioned that award dated 24.04.2023 was received by the petitioner
on 24.05.2023 whereas both the dates of award as well as receipt of
award should be 24.04.2024. Submissions found to be genuine being
typographical error. Reader is directed to do the needful in red ink.
Application filed on behalf of petitioner is disposed off
accordingly.
Let notice of the petition be issued to the respondent
through all permissible modes on filing of PF/RC and all other modes,
returnable for 04.02.2025. Let arbitral record be also requisitioned.
VINEETA GOYAL
District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi / 21.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 233/24 Ace Engineers Bureau Engineers And
Contractors Vs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR
06.11.2024
Fresh petition received by way of allocation. It be
checked and registered.
Present: Sh. Jagjit Singh, ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Be listed for consideration on 21.11.2024.
VINEETA GOYAL
District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi / 06.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 26 OMP (COMM.) 233/24 ACE ENGINEERS BUREAU
ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS VS. MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.
21.05.2026
Present : Sh. Jagjit Singh (VC) and Sh. Abhijeet Singh, Ld. Counsel
for petitioner.
Sh. Talib Khan, Ld. counsel for respondent (VC).
At joint request, renotify the matter for arguments on
15.10.2026. Both parties are at liberty to file written submissions
before the next date of hearing.
(DEEPALI SHARMA)
District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi /21.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 25 OMP (COMM) : 233/2024
ACE ENGINEERS BUREAU ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS
VS. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.
10.02.2026
Present : None for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
None has appeared on behalf of parties since morning
despite repeated calls.
In the interest of justice, renotify the matter for
arguments on 21.05.2026.
( DEEPALI SHARMA )
District Judge (Commercial Court)-03
PHC / New Delhi / 10.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 25 OMP (COMM.) 233/24 Ace Engineers Bureau Engineers And
Contractors Vs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND
ANR
04.11.2025
Present : Sh. Jagjit Singh, Ld. Counsel for petitioner (through VC).
Sh. Talib Khan, Ld. Counsel for respondents (through
VC).
Rejoinder to the reply to objections filed u/s. 34 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act has been filed on behalf of petitioner.
Arbitral record received.
Renotify the matter for arguments on the petition on
10.02.2026.
DEEPALI SHARMA
District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi / 04.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) No.233/24
Ace Engineers Bureau Engineers and Contractors v/s Municipal
Corporation of Delhi and Anr
04.09.2025
Present: Sh. Jagjit Singh, Sh. Preet Singh and Sh. Rahul Khan, ld.
counsels for petitioner.
Sh. Talib Khan, ld. counsel for respondent (VC).
Reply received from Branch-In-Charge, Bail and Filing
Section who has stated that as per CIS server, the matter was initially
e-filed on 24.07.2024 with E-filing no. ADL202300144408C
202400006 which was rejected on 26.07.2024 for want of curing
some objections and re-filed on 27.08.2024 which was
verified/approved on 31.08.2024.
Since the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act is challenging the impugned award dated
24.04.2024, the petition having been e-filed on 24.07.2024 is filed on
last day of the third month and is within the period of limitation as
enunciated in Section 34 (3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Let steps be taken for requisition of arbitral record, on
filing of PF, returnable for 04.11.2025.
HEMANI MALHOTRA
District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi / 04.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 32 OMP (COMM.) 233/24 Ace Engineers Bureau Engineers And
Contractors Vs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR
09.07.2025
Present: Sh. Jagjit Singh, ld. counsel for petitioner (VC).
Sh. Talib Khan and Sh. Adnan Khan, ld. counsels for
respondents.
Reply on behalf of respondents filed.
Ld. counsel for petitioner seeks time to file rejoinder.
Steps have not been taken to summon the arbitral record
in compliance of the last order. Be taken within a week.
At this stage, ld. counsel for respondents submits that
report be called from Filing Section as to when present petition was
filed as
prima facie , present petition is barred by limitation.
As per E-courts Website, actual date of filing was
31.08.2024 and according to the petitioner, award was received by
petitioner on 24.04.2024, therefore,
prima facie, Section 34 of
Arbitration and Conciliation Act was filed after a lapse of 120 days.
Considering the submissions, it is imperative that report
be called from Filing Section as to when the present petition was
filed.
Be listed for 04.09.2025.
HEMANI MALHOTRA
District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi / 09.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 233/24 Ace Engineers Bureau Engineers And
Contractors Vs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR
07.04.2025
Present: Sh. Jagjit Singh, ld. Counsel for petitioner (VC).
Sh. Talib Khan,ld. Counsel for respondents.
Ld. Counsel for respondent states that reply to petition
under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act was e-filed on
24.03.2025 and filed physically on 24/25.03.2025. He places on
record application seeking condonation of delay of 37 days in filing
of reply. Advance copy already supplied through email to opposite
side.
Record perused.
It is noted that reply is not on record.
Ahlmad is directed to trace and place the same on record.
Ld. Counsel for respondent states that he will check with
his office too and also raised an objection that petition is barred by
law of limitation.
Be listed for arguments on 09.07.2025.
Arbitral record be requisitioned on filing of PF.
Steps be taken within a week.
VINEETA GOYAL
District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi / 07.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 17 OMP (COMM.) 233/24 Ace Engineers Bureau Engineers And
Contractors Vs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR
21.11.2024
Present: Sh. Jagjit Singh and Sh. Preet Singh, ld. Counsels for
petitioner.
An application u/s. 151 CPC r/w Section 153 CPC
seeking correction of typographical error in para 1 of the objection
petition filed by petitioner.
Heard.
The petitioner has filed instant objection petition for
setting aside award dated 24.04.2024. It is plea of the petitioner that
due to typographical error in para 1 of the petition, it has been
mentioned that award dated 24.04.2023 was received by the petitioner
on 24.05.2023 whereas both the dates of award as well as receipt of
award should be 24.04.2024. Submissions found to be genuine being
typographical error. Reader is directed to do the needful in red ink.
Application filed on behalf of petitioner is disposed off
accordingly.
Let notice of the petition be issued to the respondent
through all permissible modes on filing of PF/RC and all other modes,
returnable for 04.02.2025. Let arbitral record be also requisitioned.
VINEETA GOYAL
District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi / 21.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 233/24 Ace Engineers Bureau Engineers And
Contractors Vs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR
06.11.2024
Fresh petition received by way of allocation. It be
checked and registered.
Present: Sh. Jagjit Singh, ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Be listed for consideration on 21.11.2024.
VINEETA GOYAL
District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi / 06.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --