Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR DLND01007131202606 Jul 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 06 Jul 2026 · CNR DLND010071312026

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Bail Matter No.1603/2026
Shivam Tyagi vs. State
FIR No. 17/2026
P. S : Cyber, New Delhi
U/s : 112(2) BNS
06.07.2026
This is a fresh application u/s 483 BNSS filed on behalf of
applicant/accused Shivam Tyagi for grant of regular bail.
Present: Ms. Manisha Singh, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
HC Rajvir Yadav, IO of the case.
Sh. B.B.Sharma, Ld. counsel for applicant/accused.
1. Reply filed. Copy supplied.
2. Arguments heard and record perused.
3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant is
in custody in this case since 14.06.2026, he is innocent and has been
falsely implicated in the present case, he is not required for further
investigation and the accused has clean antecedents. He has further
submitted that the main accused persons, namely, Vikas Verma and Arpit
Malik have already been admitted to bail in this case. He has submitted
that there are no allegations that the alleged cheated amount was
deposited in any bank account of the applicant/accused. He has prayed
that the applicant/accused be admitted to bail in this case.
Contd...2.
-- 1 of 5 --
- 2 -
4. Ld. Addl. PP for State has opposed the present bail
application submitting that co-accused Arpit Malik had disclosed that he
had shared the bank account details of co-accused Vikas Verma with his
friend Puneet and that the applicant had assisted him in obtaining the
bank account details of co-accused Vikas Verma. She submitted that co-
accused Arpit Malik also disclosed that the applicant was generating UPI
IDs and creating QR codes which were allegedly used for fraudulent
purposes.
5. IO upon enquiry has admitted that the applicant is in custody
in this case since 14.06.2026 and the other 2 co-accused persons i.e. Vikas
Verma and Arpit Malik have already been admitted to bail on this case.
IO has submitted that one mobile phone has already been seized from
applicant and he is not required for further investigation. IO has also
submitted that the total cheated amount which was deposited in the said
account of HDFC bank was Rs.1,49,000/-.
6. The case of the prosecution in nutshell is that during the
course of data analysis one suspicious bank account of HDFC Bank
bearing Account No. 50100664037442 was identified in the name of co-
accused Vikas Verma which was found linked with one NCRP complaint
and was a layer one account. During investigation, it was revealed that
the said account was in the name of co-accused Vikas Verma which was
being used for receiving, transferring and withdrawing the proceeds of the
Contd...3.
-- 2 of 5 --
- 3 -
Bail Matter No.1603/2026
Shivam Tyagi vs. State
FIR No. 17/2026
P. S : Cyber, New Delhi
U/s : 112(2) BNS
crime/cheated money. Co-accused Vikas Verma was arrested on
05.02.2026 in the present case who disclosed that he had provided the
said bank account details to his friend Arpit Malik (co-accused). Co-
accused Arpit Malik was arrested in this case on 07.02.2026. Co-accused
Arpit Malik during his disclosure statement stated that he had shared the
bank account details of co-accused Vikas Verma with his friend Puneet,
the applicant had assisted him in obtaining the bank account details of co-
accused Vikas Verma and that the applicant was generating UPI IDs and
creating QR codes which were allegedly used for fraudulent purposes.
During examination of mobile phone and digital records, whatsapp chats
were also found and examined wherein some communication relevant to
the present investigation was found. It is, however, an admitted position
that the applicant is in custody in this case since 14.06.2026 and other two
main co-accused persons i.e. Vikas Verma and Arpit Malik have already
been admitted to bail in this case. It is also an admitted position that co-
accused Vikas Verma in whose name above said bank account was there
has already been admitted to bail by ld.JMFC-06, Patiala House Courts,
New Delhi, vide order 21.02.2026. IO has also submitted that mobile
phone of the applicant has already been seized and he is not required for
further investigation. It is also an admitted position that the applicant has
Contd...4.
-- 3 of 5 --
- 4 -
clean antecedents. The prosecution has also not raised any
reasonable apprehension that if applicant is admitted to bail in this case
then he is either a flight risk or he may tamper with the evidence. In view
of the above said discussion, no fruitful purpose would be served by
keeping the above said applicant in further custody. The
applicant/accused, Shivam Tyagi is thus admitted to bail on furnishing a
personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety of the like
amount each subject to the satisfaction of Ld. CJM/Ld.Trial
Court/Ld.Duty JMFC subject to the following conditions:
a) The applicant/accused shall join the investigation as and
when required by IO/SHO concerned.
b) The applicant/accused shall not commit any similar offence or any
offence while on bail.
c) The applicant/accused shall not make any inducement, threat or
promise to any witness or person acquainted with the facts of the
present case and shall not try to tamper with any evidence.
d) The applicant/accused shall not misuse the liberty of bail in any
manner and shall not flee from justice.
e) The applicant/accused shall not leave India without the prior
permission of the ld. Trial Court.
7. It is clarified that if the applicant/accused would violate any
of the above said conditions of bail then the prosecution or the
investigating agency shall be at liberty to move an application for
cancellation of bail of the accused.
Contd...5.
-- 4 of 5 --
- 5 -
Bail Matter No.1603/2026
Shivam Tyagi vs. State
FIR No. 17/2026
P. S : Cyber, New Delhi
U/s : 112(2) BNS
8. The observations as made in this order are only for the
disposal of the present bail application and these shall not be any
reflection on the merits of the case.
9. The present bail application is disposed of accordingly.
10.
Copy of this order be given dasti and be also sent to the
concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary information.
(Amit Bansal)
Roster Judge, ASJ-02
NDD/PHC/New Delhi
06.07.2026
-- 5 of 5 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.