Interim Order 10

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 Cr Rev 472/2024
United Airlines Inc. vs. The Labour Enforcement Officer
CNR No. DLND01-006923-2024
30.07.2026
Present: Sh. Arjun Mahajan, Sh. Raghuvendra and Ms. Bhavya
Arora, Ld. Counsels for revisionist.
Sh. Abhishek Vyas, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Condonation of delay
1. Arguments heard on application for condonation of delay of
about 2 years in filing the present petition.
2. Ld. Counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist
had initially approached the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi by filing a
petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. and vide order dated 24.07.2024, the Hon’ble
High Court permitted the revisionist to avail the appropriate remedy
before the Court of Sessions and further observed that the question of
condonation of delay shall be considered by the Ld. Sessions Court in
accordance with law.
3. Ld. Counsel for the respondent has vehemently opposed the
present application and submits that the present application is liable to be
dismissed.
4. Undoubtedly, the discretion to condone the delay has to be
exercised judiciously based upon the facts and circumstances of each
case. Law is well settled that in order to condone the delay to enable the
Courts to do substantial justice and to apply law in meaningful manner
which subserves the ends of justice.
5. In the aforesaid order dated 24.07.2024, Hon’ble High Court
has also mentioned in para 8 that “
the delay, if any, on account of filing
of the petition before this court shall be condoned” and also finds
mention that the Ld. Counsel for petitioner shall file petition before the
Sessions Court within one month.
6. The present revision petition has been filed within one
month from the date of said order.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
7. Keeping in view the entire facts and circumstances of the
present case, the application in hand is allowed and delay in filing the
present petition is condoned.
8. Application stands disposed of accordingly.
Cr Rev 472/2024
9. Arguments heard on the present revision petition and
concluded.
10. Ld. Counsel for revisionist seeks time to file written
submissions and certain case laws in support of his arguments within
three days.
11. Heard. Considered.
12. Ld. Counsel is at liberty to file the same with advance
copy of the citation to Ld. Counsel for respondent.
13. Put up for rebuttal arguments, if any, otherwise for orders
on 13.08.2026.
(Shefali Barnala Tandon)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC/30.07.2026 (r)
-- 2 of 2 --