RADHA RAMAN GUPTA AND ANRVsCHAUDHARY TIMBER INDUSTRIES

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr Vs. Chaudhary Timber Industries
05.05.2026
Present: None for revisionists.
Sh. Arvind, Ld. Proxy Counsel for respondent.
Ld. Proxy counsel for respondent submits that though the
matter has been settled, however, the payments are not being made and
settlement is not honored.
Heard. Considered.
Court notice issued to the revisionist received back
unserved with report that he has left the given premises.
Accordingly, issue court notice to the Ld. Counsel for
revisionist as per the vakalatnama filed, returnable for the next date of
hearing.
Relist on 08.09.2026.
(Shefali Barnala Tandon)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC/05.05.2026 (r)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr. Rev. No. 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Ors. Vs. Chaudhary Timer Industries
17.11.2025
Present: Ms. Mahima Bajaj, Ld. Proxy Counsel for revisionist.
None for respondent.
1. Matter is fixed for orders, however, perusal of record shows
that arguments have been heard by Ld. Predecessor of this Court, hence,
this Court deems it appropriate to hear the arguments afresh.
2. None has appeared on behalf of respondent. Notice be
issued to respondent as well as its counsel for the next date of hearing.
3. Put up for final arguments on 24.02.2026.
4. Trial Court Record be summoned atleast one day prior to the
next date of hearing.
5.
Interim order, if any to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Shefali Barnala Tandon)
ASJ-06 / New Delhi District
Patiala House Court/17.11.2025 (gr)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr. vs. Chaudhary Timber Industries.
17.10.2025
Present : Ms. Kamakshi Singh Rao, Ld. Counsel for revisionist
through VC.
None for respondent.
Arguments heard on the petition on behalf of petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for revisionist states that the petition may
be disposed off in view of the judgment passed by Hon’ble
Supreme Court in the matter of Rakesh Bhanot vs. M/s Gurdas
Agro Pvt. Ltd.
The respondent is at liberty to address arguments on or
before next date.
Be put up for order on 17.11.2025.
(NEHA)
ASJ-06 / New Delhi District
Patiala House Court/17.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr. vs. Chaudhary Timber Industries.
17.10.2025
Present : Ms. Kamakshi Singh Rao, Ld. Counsel for revisionist
through VC.
None for respondent.
Arguments heard on the petition on behalf of petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for revisionist states that the petition may
be disposed off in view of the judgment passed by Hon’ble
Supreme Court in the matter of Rakesh Bhanot vs. M/s Gurdas
Agro Pvt. Ltd.
The respondent is at liberty to address arguments on or
before next date.
Be put up for order on 17.11.2025.
(NEHA)
ASJ-06 / New Delhi District
Patiala House Court/17.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev / 450/2024
RADHA RAMAN GUPTA AND ANR Vs. CHAUDHARY
TIMBER INDUSTRIES
08.07.2025
Present Ms. Kamakshi Singh Rao, Ld. Counsel for revisionist
Sh. Aradhya Aggarwal, Ld. Proxy counsel for
respondent
Ld. Proxy counsel for respondent seeks adjournment as
main counsel is not available today.
TCR be sent back and it be summoned one day before
next date of hearing.
Be put up for arguments on 17.10.2025.
(Neha)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:08.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr.
Vs.
Chaudhary Timber Industries
25.03.2025
Present: Ms. Kamakshi Rao, Counsel for both the petitioners
(through VC).
Sh. Arvind Singh Negi, Proxy Counsel for Sh.
Jaspreet Singh, Ld. Main Counsel for the
respondent.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the
judgment in the case titled as Rakesh Bhanot vs. M/s. Gurdas
Agro Pvt. Ltd. in SLP (Crl.) No.6087/2023 has not yet been
delivered.
Accordingly, put up for awaiting decision in the said
SLP and arguments on this revision petition on 24.04.2025.
TCR be returned and it be requisitioned two days
prior to the said date.
(Dheeraj Mor)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:25.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CR 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr. Vs. Chaudhary Timber Industries
28.01.2025
Present: Ms. Kamakshi Rao, Counsel for both the petitioners
(through VC).
Sh. Amandeep Singh, Ld. Counsel for the
respondent.
Today, the matter is listed for further arguments.
The issue involved in the present case is similar to
the issue involved in the case titled as Rakesh Bhanot vs. M/s.
Gurdas Agro Pvt. Ltd. in SLP (Crl.) No.6087/2023 pending
before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India wherein arguments have
already been heard and it has been reserved for judgment on
17.12.2024.
As decision in the said SLP shall have material
bearing on the fate of this revision petition, I deem it appropriate
that arguments on present revision petition be heard only after
judgment in the said SLP is delivered.
Put up for awaiting decision in the said SLP and
arguments on this revision petition on 25.03.2025.
TCR be returned and it be requisitioned two days
prior to the said date.
(Dheeraj Mor)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:28.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr. Vs. Chaudhary Timber Industries
11.11.2024
Present: Ms. Kamakshi S. Rao, Ld. Counsel for the
petitioner.
Sh. Amandeep Singh, Ld. Counsel for the
respondent.
Part arguments are heard.
At request, put up for further arguments on present
revision petition on 28.01.2025.
(Dheeraj Mor)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:11.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr. Vs. Chaudhary Timber Industries
21.10.2024
Present: Ms. Kamakshi Rao, Ld. Counsel for both the
petitioners.
Sh. Jaspreet Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioners has placed on record
the certified copy of the impugned order dated 20.06.2024.
Part arguments on present revision petition are
heard.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioners submits that she
needs some time to verify whether the interim order passed in
Gaurav Mittal & Anr. vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. in Writ
Petition (Crl.) 2889/2023 dated 05.10.2023 has been vacated or it
is continuing till date. For the said purpose, she seeks an
adjournment.
Accordingly, at request, put up for further arguments
on 11.11.2024.
(Dheeraj Mor)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:21.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CR 450/24
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr. vs. Chaudhary Timber Industries
23.08.2024
Fresh revision petition is received by way of
assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules.
Present: Sh. Sonam Sharma and Ms. Kamakshi S. Rao, Ld.
Counsels for both the petitioners.
Heard. Case file is carefully perused.
Vide present revision petition, the petitioners have
challenged the order dated 20.06.2024 of Ld. MM (NI Act)-04
whereby their application u/s. 96 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016 seeking stay of proceedings/trial of criminal
complaint case u/s. 138 NI Act instituted by the respondent was
dismissed.
Issue notice of the present revision petition to the
respondent on filing of PF&RC and through approved courier
returnable on 21.10.2024.
TCR be also summoned for the said date.
(Dheeraj Mor)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:23.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14 Cr Rev / 450/2024
RADHA RAMAN GUPTA AND ANR Vs. CHAUDHARY
TIMBER INDUSTRIES
PS : (Connaught Place)
08.09.2026
Present: Ms. Kamakshi Singh, Ld. Counsel for the
Revisionist appeared through VC.
Sh. Kamaljeet Singh, Ld. Counsel for the
Respondent in person.
An application seeking her discharge has been
moved by the counsel for the revisionist.
Issue notice of this application to the
revisionist, on filing of PF, for the NDOH.
List on 27.10.2026.
(Gomati Manocha)
ASJ-04 / New Delhi District
Patiala House Court/08.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr Vs. Chaudhary Timber Industries
05.05.2026
Present: None for revisionists.
Sh. Arvind, Ld. Proxy Counsel for respondent.
Ld. Proxy counsel for respondent submits that though the
matter has been settled, however, the payments are not being made and
settlement is not honored.
Heard. Considered.
Court notice issued to the revisionist received back
unserved with report that he has left the given premises.
Accordingly, issue court notice to the Ld. Counsel for
revisionist as per the vakalatnama filed, returnable for the next date of
hearing.
Relist on 08.09.2026.
(Shefali Barnala Tandon)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC/05.05.2026 (r)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr. Rev. No. 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Ors. Vs. Chaudhary Timer Industries
17.11.2025
Present: Ms. Mahima Bajaj, Ld. Proxy Counsel for revisionist.
None for respondent.
1. Matter is fixed for orders, however, perusal of record shows
that arguments have been heard by Ld. Predecessor of this Court, hence,
this Court deems it appropriate to hear the arguments afresh.
2. None has appeared on behalf of respondent. Notice be
issued to respondent as well as its counsel for the next date of hearing.
3. Put up for final arguments on 24.02.2026.
4. Trial Court Record be summoned atleast one day prior to the
next date of hearing.
5.
Interim order, if any to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Shefali Barnala Tandon)
ASJ-06 / New Delhi District
Patiala House Court/17.11.2025 (gr)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr. vs. Chaudhary Timber Industries.
17.10.2025
Present : Ms. Kamakshi Singh Rao, Ld. Counsel for revisionist
through VC.
None for respondent.
Arguments heard on the petition on behalf of petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for revisionist states that the petition may
be disposed off in view of the judgment passed by Hon’ble
Supreme Court in the matter of Rakesh Bhanot vs. M/s Gurdas
Agro Pvt. Ltd.
The respondent is at liberty to address arguments on or
before next date.
Be put up for order on 17.11.2025.
(NEHA)
ASJ-06 / New Delhi District
Patiala House Court/17.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr. vs. Chaudhary Timber Industries.
17.10.2025
Present : Ms. Kamakshi Singh Rao, Ld. Counsel for revisionist
through VC.
None for respondent.
Arguments heard on the petition on behalf of petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for revisionist states that the petition may
be disposed off in view of the judgment passed by Hon’ble
Supreme Court in the matter of Rakesh Bhanot vs. M/s Gurdas
Agro Pvt. Ltd.
The respondent is at liberty to address arguments on or
before next date.
Be put up for order on 17.11.2025.
(NEHA)
ASJ-06 / New Delhi District
Patiala House Court/17.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev / 450/2024
RADHA RAMAN GUPTA AND ANR Vs. CHAUDHARY
TIMBER INDUSTRIES
08.07.2025
Present Ms. Kamakshi Singh Rao, Ld. Counsel for revisionist
Sh. Aradhya Aggarwal, Ld. Proxy counsel for
respondent
Ld. Proxy counsel for respondent seeks adjournment as
main counsel is not available today.
TCR be sent back and it be summoned one day before
next date of hearing.
Be put up for arguments on 17.10.2025.
(Neha)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:08.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr.
Vs.
Chaudhary Timber Industries
25.03.2025
Present: Ms. Kamakshi Rao, Counsel for both the petitioners
(through VC).
Sh. Arvind Singh Negi, Proxy Counsel for Sh.
Jaspreet Singh, Ld. Main Counsel for the
respondent.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the
judgment in the case titled as Rakesh Bhanot vs. M/s. Gurdas
Agro Pvt. Ltd. in SLP (Crl.) No.6087/2023 has not yet been
delivered.
Accordingly, put up for awaiting decision in the said
SLP and arguments on this revision petition on 24.04.2025.
TCR be returned and it be requisitioned two days
prior to the said date.
(Dheeraj Mor)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:25.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CR 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr. Vs. Chaudhary Timber Industries
28.01.2025
Present: Ms. Kamakshi Rao, Counsel for both the petitioners
(through VC).
Sh. Amandeep Singh, Ld. Counsel for the
respondent.
Today, the matter is listed for further arguments.
The issue involved in the present case is similar to
the issue involved in the case titled as Rakesh Bhanot vs. M/s.
Gurdas Agro Pvt. Ltd. in SLP (Crl.) No.6087/2023 pending
before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India wherein arguments have
already been heard and it has been reserved for judgment on
17.12.2024.
As decision in the said SLP shall have material
bearing on the fate of this revision petition, I deem it appropriate
that arguments on present revision petition be heard only after
judgment in the said SLP is delivered.
Put up for awaiting decision in the said SLP and
arguments on this revision petition on 25.03.2025.
TCR be returned and it be requisitioned two days
prior to the said date.
(Dheeraj Mor)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:28.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr. Vs. Chaudhary Timber Industries
11.11.2024
Present: Ms. Kamakshi S. Rao, Ld. Counsel for the
petitioner.
Sh. Amandeep Singh, Ld. Counsel for the
respondent.
Part arguments are heard.
At request, put up for further arguments on present
revision petition on 28.01.2025.
(Dheeraj Mor)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:11.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 450/2024
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr. Vs. Chaudhary Timber Industries
21.10.2024
Present: Ms. Kamakshi Rao, Ld. Counsel for both the
petitioners.
Sh. Jaspreet Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioners has placed on record
the certified copy of the impugned order dated 20.06.2024.
Part arguments on present revision petition are
heard.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioners submits that she
needs some time to verify whether the interim order passed in
Gaurav Mittal & Anr. vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. in Writ
Petition (Crl.) 2889/2023 dated 05.10.2023 has been vacated or it
is continuing till date. For the said purpose, she seeks an
adjournment.
Accordingly, at request, put up for further arguments
on 11.11.2024.
(Dheeraj Mor)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:21.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CR 450/24
Radha Raman Gupta & Anr. vs. Chaudhary Timber Industries
23.08.2024
Fresh revision petition is received by way of
assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules.
Present: Sh. Sonam Sharma and Ms. Kamakshi S. Rao, Ld.
Counsels for both the petitioners.
Heard. Case file is carefully perused.
Vide present revision petition, the petitioners have
challenged the order dated 20.06.2024 of Ld. MM (NI Act)-04
whereby their application u/s. 96 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016 seeking stay of proceedings/trial of criminal
complaint case u/s. 138 NI Act instituted by the respondent was
dismissed.
Issue notice of the present revision petition to the
respondent on filing of PF&RC and through approved courier
returnable on 21.10.2024.
TCR be also summoned for the said date.
(Dheeraj Mor)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:23.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --