Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1181/2024
STATE VS. RAVINDER AGGARWAL
FIR NO. 382 /2024
PS VASANT KUNJ SOUTH
U/S. 329(4)/333/351(3)/3(5) BNS
08.08.2024
This is the application for anticipatory bail filed on
behalf of applicant Ravinder Aggarwal.
Present: Sh. Manoj Kumar Garg, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Sh. S.K. Aggarwal, ld. Defence Counsel for accused.
IO SI Mahendra is present.
Reply filed by the IO. Copy supplied.
It is submitted by ld. Defence Counsel that complainant in
the present case is the brother in law of the applicant. The
applicant and the complainant are owner of land ad-measuring
3630 sq. yards, khasra no. 1832 with village Malikpur, Kohi
Rangpuri, A Block, Vasant Kunj Enclave, New Delhi. The
applicant is the owner of area ad-measuring 1210 sq. yards and
the remaining land ad-measuring 2420 sq. yards is owned by the
complainant. The entire land was never demarcated or divided
but they are in possession of their particular portions. The entire
piece of land is bounded with boundary wall and the gate
remains under the lock and key of the applicant and his son. The
….contd.
-- 1 of 3 --
--2--
complainant had finalized the transaction to sell his portion to
some third person. Hence, the talks of constructing the boundary
wall with regard to their respective portions was going on
between the parties, however, on 27.07.2024 when applicant was
in office, he noticed the movement of a JCB machine near the
gate of the property and saw that the JCB machine had started
breaking part of the boundary wall of the property. He
immediately called the police. Before this, he had already lodged
peshbandi / intimation at PS Vasant Kunj dated 18.07.2024. It is
submitted that the police officials instead of lodging an FIR on
the complaint of the applicant had lodged the present false FIR
against him and his son on the complaint filed by the
complainant who is a retired senior bureaucrat. It is submitted
that the applicant has already joined the investigation and is still
ready to join the investigation but apprehends his arrest, hence,
the present application.
The IO has submitted that the applicant has duly joined the
investigation and he does not require his custodial interrogation
at present.
….contd.
-- 2 of 3 --
--3--
In view of the submissions of the IO and the facts brought
to the notice of the court by the ld. Defence Counsel, the
applicant is directed to join the investigation as and when
required by the IO.
Put up for fresh report of the IO on 10.09.2024.
Till then, no coercive steps be taken against the
applicant.
(KIRAN GUPTA)
Addl. Sessions Judge-04
Patiala House Courts
New Delhi/08.08.2024
-- 3 of 3 --