Final Order 3

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 BAIL MATTERS 1234/2026
THE STATE AND ORS VS. THAKUR SINGH
21 BAIL MATTERS 1235/2026
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI VS. PAWAN KUMAR
FIR No. 38/2026
PS: CYBER NEW DELHI (SOUTH-WEST)
U/S 112(2)/317(5) BNS
11.06.2026
These are two separate bail applications u/s 483 BNSS
moved on behalf of the applicants/accused persons namely Thakur
Singh s/o Sh. Hayat Singh and Pawan Kumar s/o Sh.Vinod.
Present : Sh. Shiv Kumar, Ld. Addl.P.P. for the State.
Sh. Varun Malik, Ld. counsel for both the applicants/
accused persons.
SI/HC Yogesh Kumar.
Fresh common reply filed by IO.
TCR received.
Ld. counsel for the applicants/accused persons
arguments on the line of bail applications while submitting that both
the applicants/accused persons are innocent and they have been falsely
implicated in this case. It is urged that applicants/accused persons
were arrested in this case on 01.04.2026 and since their custodial
Page 1 of 4
-- 1 of 4 --
interrogation was not required, they were remanded to JC and since
then they are in JC. It is urged that after completion of investigation in
this case, charge sheet has already been filed before the court. It is
further urged that accused persons have already made payment of
cheated amount of Rs. 23,000/- to one Hitesh Naik. It is further stated
that the applicants/accused persons are having clean antecedents and
they may be granted bail in this case.
On the other hand, Ld. Addl. P.P. opposed the
application, highlighting the gravity of the offence involving cyber
fraud and the need to prevent tampering with evidence. It is further
stated that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has already
been filed in this case that the transactions in issue took place in
account of the applicants/accused persons. It is stated that the accused
persons were involved in organized cyber fraud pertaining to
investment fraud and cheating of total amount of Rs. 1,03,000/-. It is
stated that accused Thakur Singh had received Rs. 10,000/-
commission and accused Pawan Kumar had received Rs. 26,000/-
commission for supplying their account. It is accordingly submitted
that the bail application is liable to be dismissed.
Considering the submissions made by both parties,
period of custody, the fact that the charge sheet has already been filed,
as well as the fact that cheated amount has already been partly paid,
Page 2 of 4
-- 2 of 4 --
both the bail applications are allowed. Both the applicants/accused
persons namely Pawan Kumar and Thakur Singh are directed to be
released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.
20,000/- each with one surety each of like amount, to the satisfaction
of the Ld. Trial Court/Duty Magistrate, subject to the following
conditions:
a. Both the applicants/accused persons shall not leave the
country without prior permission.
b. Both the applicants/accused persons shall not contact,
threaten, or influence any witnesses or tamper with evidence.
c. Both the applicants/accused persons shall not indulge in any
similar criminal activity.
d. Both the applicants/accused persons shall provide their
current mobile numbers and addresses to the Investigating
Officer and inform of any changes.
e. Both the applicants/accused persons shall appear before the
court on dates of hearing.
Accordingly, both the bail applications stand disposed of
accordingly.
TCR be sent back.
Page 3 of 4
-- 3 of 4 --
A copy of this order be given dasti and copy thereof be
sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for intimation to both the
applicants/accused persons, in compliance with Sanjay Singh v. State
(Govt. of NCT of Delhi), Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 974/2022.
Nothing in this order shall be construed as an opinion on
the merits of the case.
(DEEPALI SHARMA)
Vacation Judge/District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi /11.06.2026
Page 4 of 4
-- 4 of 4 --