Final Order 3

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 BAIL MATTERS 1193/2026
STATE OF DELHI VS. DIPANKAR BHOWMICK
FIR NO. 82/2025
PS: CYBER NEW DELHI (South West)
U/S: 318(4)/319(2)/61(2) BNS
11.06.2026
This is an anticipatory bail application u/s 482 BNSS
moved on behalf of the applicant/accused Dipankar Bhowmick.
Present : Sh. Shiv Kumar, Ld. Addl.P.P. for the State.
Sh. Prince Sugandh, Ld. counsel for applicant/accused
(VC).
IO/SI Love Deswal (VC) and SI Prem Prakash in
person.
Ld. counsel for the applicant/accused has argued on the
lines of anticipatory bail application by submitting that the
applicant/accused is innocent and he is falsely implicated in this case.
It is stated that applicant/accused has no criminal antecedents. it is
further stated that none of the mobile numbers UPI ID account number
mentioned in the FIR belongs to the applicant/accused and the name of
applicant/accused is also not mentioned in the FIR. It is further stated
that applicant/accused is willing to join investigation with the IO
concerned as and when directed and as such anticipatory bail may be
granted to the applicant/accused.
Page 1 of 3
-- 1 of 3 --
On the other hand, Ld. Addl.P.P. for the State opposed
the application highlighting the gravity of the offence involving cyber
fraud and the need to prevent tampering with evidence. It is further
submitted that present case was registered on the complaint of Sh.
Pardeep Kumar wherein he alleged that he has been cheated of Rs.
6,91,600/- by the fraudsters. It is urged that during investigation,
beneficiary details of transactions were obtained and it revealed that
the complainant transferred said amount from his Axis Bank Account
in seven transactions to the account numbers provided by fraudsters,
out of which an amount of Rs. 91,800/- was transferred in UCO Bank
account of the applicant/accused. It is urged that after analysis, it
revealed that a total amount of Rs. 12,49,089/- was credited in the
alleged account of applicant/accused. It is further urged that on
searching on NCRP Portal in respect of other accounts involved in this
case, it was found that three NCRP complaint were found linked with
another account involved in this case. It is urged that despite service of
notice u/s 35(3) BNSS, applicant/accused did not join investigation of
this case. It is further urged that custodial interrogation of the
applicant/accused is required to trace the operators of the alleged
accounts, who utilized the cheated amount and to recover the case
property i.e. devices/ATM/Account Kit used in commission of the
alleged account.
Page 2 of 3
-- 2 of 3 --
I have heard ld. counsel for both the parties and perused
the record including replies filed by the IO.
Considering the above-mentioned submissions and the
facts that there are specific allegations against the applicant/accused
that cheated amount was credited in his bank account and that
custodial interrogation of the applicant/accused is required to trace out
the operators of the alleged accounts, who utilized the cheated amount
and to recover the case property, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory
bail to the applicant/accused. Accordingly, present anticipatory bail
application of the applicant/accused Dipankar Bhowmick stands
dismissed.
Copy of order be given dasti to the ld. counsel for
applicant/accused. Application be consigned to Record Room.
(DEEPALI SHARMA)
Vacation Judge/District Judge (Commercial Court-03)
PHC / New Delhi /11.06.2026
Page 3 of 3
-- 3 of 3 --