SAVLEEN KAUR PROPRIETOR OF PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT FACILITY SERVICESVsMinistry of Defence

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16
CS (COMM.) 595/25
SAVLEEN KAUR PROPRIETOR OF PROFESSIONAL
MANAGEMENT FACILITY SERVICES Vs. MINISTRY OF
DEFENCE
20.04.2026
Present: Sh. Sanjeev Kumar and Ms. Aakriti Sharma, Ld.
Counsel for the Plaintiff.
Sh. Sumanth V. Dy. Director, Sh. Ranjay Kumar,
Dy. Director and Sh. Sanjeev S. Admin Officer in
person.
In the present case defendant was served through
ordinary process on 26.09.2025 whereas, the WS has been filed.
The WS has stated to have been filed through e-filing on
17.04.2026.
Copy of the e-filing along with the documents is
placed on record, however the signed and original copy of the
same is not placed on record but on perusing the same from the
date of service that is 26.09.2025 to the date of filing i.e.,
17.04.2026 more than 120 days already expired. Maximum
period of 120 days already expired on 26.01.2026.
In these circumstances, the WS cannot be taken on
record.
Therefore, defence of the defendant stands struck off
in terms of Order VIII Rule 10 of the CPC, 1908..
Be put up for framing of issues/further proceedings
on 11.08.2026.
Sanjay Khanagwal
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi
20.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12
CS (COMM.)/595/2025
DLND010056692025
SAVLEEN KAUR PROPRIETOR OF PROFESSIONAL
MANAGEMENT FACILITY SERVICES
VS.
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
17.10.2025
Present: Sh. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate for Plaintiff (through
video conferencing).
Plaintiff has filed Affidavit under Order XI Rule 6
(3) CPC and Certificate under Section 63 BSA in compliance of
last order. Same is taken on record.
Defendant is served through ordinary summons as
well as speed post on 26.09.2025.
Sh. Subesh Pal Malik, Advocate for the defendant.
He has filed the BTF.
Case is adjourned for filing of WS by the defendant
within the statutory period with advance copy to the plaintiff to
which replication, if any, may be filed by plaintiff.
Put up on 20.01.2026 for completion of pleadings,
First Case Management Hearing and framing of issues.
Balwant Rai Bansal
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
17.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.)/595/2025
DLND010056692025
SAVLEEN KAUR PROPRIETOR OF PROFESSIONAL
MANAGEMENT FACILITY SERVICES Vs.
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
11.08.2026
Present: Sh. Sanjeev Kumar, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff
through VC.
Sh. Vikrant, Section Officer, Ministry of Defence
(on behalf of the defendant).
Heard. Perused.
Defence of the defendant was struck off under Order
VIII Rule 10 CPC by Ld. Predecessor vide order dated 20.04.2026.
Since the defence of the defendant has been struck off,
therefore, the defendant will have limited right to cross-examine the
plaintiff witnesses based on the lacunae and deficiency in the case of
plaintiff and no opportunity can be granted to defendant to lead DE.
Hence, re-notify for PE on 16.10.2026.
List of witnesses and affidavits of evidence be filed
before the NDOH and advance copy thereof shall be supplied to the
defendants.
Ashutosh Kumar
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi
11.08.2026
At this stage at 11:30 A.M.
Present: Sh. Sudesh Pal Malik, Ld. counsel for the defendant
through VC.
He has been apprised about the date and purpose fixed.
Ashutosh Kumar
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi
11.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16
CS (COMM.) 595/25
SAVLEEN KAUR PROPRIETOR OF PROFESSIONAL
MANAGEMENT FACILITY SERVICES Vs. MINISTRY OF
DEFENCE
20.04.2026
Present: Sh. Sanjeev Kumar and Ms. Aakriti Sharma, Ld.
Counsel for the Plaintiff.
Sh. Sumanth V. Dy. Director, Sh. Ranjay Kumar,
Dy. Director and Sh. Sanjeev S. Admin Officer in
person.
In the present case defendant was served through
ordinary process on 26.09.2025 whereas, the WS has been filed.
The WS has stated to have been filed through e-filing on
17.04.2026.
Copy of the e-filing along with the documents is
placed on record, however the signed and original copy of the
same is not placed on record but on perusing the same from the
date of service that is 26.09.2025 to the date of filing i.e.,
17.04.2026 more than 120 days already expired. Maximum
period of 120 days already expired on 26.01.2026.
In these circumstances, the WS cannot be taken on
record.
Therefore, defence of the defendant stands struck off
in terms of Order VIII Rule 10 of the CPC, 1908..
Be put up for framing of issues/further proceedings
on 11.08.2026.
Sanjay Khanagwal
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi
20.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12
CS (COMM.)/595/2025
DLND010056692025
SAVLEEN KAUR PROPRIETOR OF PROFESSIONAL
MANAGEMENT FACILITY SERVICES
VS.
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
17.10.2025
Present: Sh. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate for Plaintiff (through
video conferencing).
Plaintiff has filed Affidavit under Order XI Rule 6
(3) CPC and Certificate under Section 63 BSA in compliance of
last order. Same is taken on record.
Defendant is served through ordinary summons as
well as speed post on 26.09.2025.
Sh. Subesh Pal Malik, Advocate for the defendant.
He has filed the BTF.
Case is adjourned for filing of WS by the defendant
within the statutory period with advance copy to the plaintiff to
which replication, if any, may be filed by plaintiff.
Put up on 20.01.2026 for completion of pleadings,
First Case Management Hearing and framing of issues.
Balwant Rai Bansal
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
17.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --