Final Order 4

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF SH.AMIT BANSAL
ASJ-02, PATIALA HOUSE COURT, NEW DELHI
Bail Matter Nos. 1152/2026 and 1192/2026
1. Ajij Miran Sheikh vs. State
2. Archiryan Goraksh Kamble vs. State
e-FIR No. 24/2025
P. S: Cyber Police Station
U/s : 318(4)/112(2)/61(2) BNS
O R D E R
05.06.2026
1. This common order shall dispose of two applications under Section
u/s 483 BNSS filed on behalf of applicants/accused persons, namely, Ajij
Miran Sheikh and Archiryan Goraksh Kamble for grant of regular bail.
Both the said applications are being taken up together for disposal vide
this common order as they pertain to the same case.
2. Replies to the bail applications have already been filed.
3. I have already heard the arguments and perused the record
including the trial court record.
Bail Matter Nos. 1152/2026 and 1192/2026
1. Ajij Miran Sheikh vs. State
2. Archiryan Goraksh Kamble vs. State
e-FIR No. 24/2025
P. S: Cyber Police Station
U/s : 318(4)/112(2)/61(2) BNS
Page No.8 of 8
-- 1 of 8 --
4. Ld. Counsel for the applicants/accused persons has submitted that
applicants are in custody in this case since 29.01.2026, they have been
falsely implicated in the present matter, they are not the main
beneficiaries of the alleged amount in question and that applicants are not
required for further investigation as the charge sheet has already been
filed. It was stated that the applicants are not a flight risk and there is no
apprehension of influencing or threatening the witnesses. He stated that
on similar facts, the co-accused Vishal Durgadass Bachal and Pranav
Jalinder Guldagad have already been admitted to bail by this court vide
order dated 21.05.2026. He stated that the allegations against the
applicants are based only on disclosure statement and there is no
independent or corroborative evidence to support them and no recovery
has been effected from the applicants. He submitted that object of bail is
to secure the appearance of the accused during the trial and the object of
bail is neither punitive nor preventative. He stated that the applicants
have no connection with the alleged fraudulent transaction forming the
subject matter of the present FIR. He submitted that any condition may
be imposed and that the applicants/accused persons may be admitted to
bail in this case.
5. Ld. Addl. PP for State has submitted that the applicants/ accused
persons were close associates of of co-accused Shridhar Dilip Ingle and
collected mule accounts from different account holders and further
Bail Matter Nos. 1152/2026 and 1192/2026
1. Ajij Miran Sheikh vs. State
2. Archiryan Goraksh Kamble vs. State
e-FIR No. 24/2025
P. S: Cyber Police Station
U/s : 318(4)/112(2)/61(2) BNS
Page No.8 of 8
-- 2 of 8 --
provided these accounts to the said co-accused. He stated that applicant
Archiryan Goraksh Kamble collected mule account on behalf of co-
accused Shridhar Dilip Ingle and works as his associate on commission
basis. He stated that the said applicant sold his 4 bank accounts and 7
NCRP complaints were found recorded against his bank accounts. It was
stated that the applicant Archiryan Goraksh Kamble sold his IDFC Bank
account along with account kit, the mobile number which belonged to the
applicant was also used in the alleged mobile phone which was used to
contact the victim and the chat between co-accused persons and the said
applicant clearly established his role in the cyber fraud. He stated that the
applicant Ajij Miran Sheikh collected mule accounts with the help of
other co-accused and further provided that mule accounts to accused
Shridhar Dilip Ingle on commission basis. He stated that the said
applicant also provided his Kotak Bank account (5248455971) to the
fraudsters and 2 NCRP complaints were found recorded against the said
bank account. He stated that there are chats between applicant Ajij Miran
Sheikh and co-accused persons which would establish his role in the
cyber fraud.
6. The IO who was present through VC stated that role of applicants
are more or less same as that of co-accused Vishal Durgadas Bachal and
Pranav Jalinder Guldagad who have already been admitted to bail by this
Bail Matter Nos. 1152/2026 and 1192/2026
1. Ajij Miran Sheikh vs. State
2. Archiryan Goraksh Kamble vs. State
e-FIR No. 24/2025
P. S: Cyber Police Station
U/s : 318(4)/112(2)/61(2) BNS
Page No.8 of 8
-- 3 of 8 --
court vide order dated 21.05.2026. He also stated that cheated amount
was not credited in the accounts of the applicants/accused persons.
7. The case of the prosecution in nutshell is that the present FIR
was registered on the complaint of Sh. Novin Rai made on NCRP portal
on 04.09.2025 alleging that on 07.07.2025, he had opened an OTC
account in the name of Nextbillion Technology Private Limited (which is
the former name of Groww Invest Tech Private Limited) for the purpose
of investing in the stock market. After opening the account, he was
contacted by an assistant, namely, Parineeti Jain, whose contact number is
8348452495 and the phone numbers mentioned below were active in their
group 8596917586, 8763310338, 8513973607, 8437081033,
9775870562, 9647112589, 9434891985, 9134205825, 9647272585,
8300381458, 8609878552, 8897590857 and 8436905719. He stated that
after two months, he came to know that the company is not a legal entity
and it has been misleading him and committing fraud. He stated that he
had paid a total amount of Rs.12,22,670/- for investment purposes.
During the course of investigation, a raid was conducted to locate alleged
calling numbers (+91-8609650943,+91-8348452495) which were
operated in Pune, Maharastra and the mobile number 7770040099
pertaining to co-accused Shridhar Dilip Ingle was in constant touch with
the above mentioned alleged mobile numbers. During interrogation
Shridhar Dilip Ingle disclosed that he sold many banks accounts to his
Bail Matter Nos. 1152/2026 and 1192/2026
1. Ajij Miran Sheikh vs. State
2. Archiryan Goraksh Kamble vs. State
e-FIR No. 24/2025
P. S: Cyber Police Station
U/s : 318(4)/112(2)/61(2) BNS
Page No.8 of 8
-- 4 of 8 --
friend Chaitanya on commission basis. He further stated that Chatainya
provided him a mobile phone Vivo S-1 having IMEI (860959040770477,
860959040770477) before going to Dubai around August 2025. He
further stated that his friends, namely, both the applicants, Pranav, Vishal
and other co-accused helped him to gather Mule Bank account from
different people.
8. The role of applicant/accused Archiryan Goraksh Kamble is to the
effect that he collected mule account on behalf of accused Shridhar Ingle,
he worked as his associate on commission basis and had sold his 4 bank
accounts with 7 NCRP complaints found recorded against his bank
accounts. Further, the mobile number of the applicant was used in
alleged mobile phone which was used to contact the victim. The chat
between the applicant and the co-accused persons clearly establishes his
role in the cyber fraud.
8.1 The role of applicant/accused Ajij Miran Sheikh is to the effect
that he collected mule accounts with the help of other co-accused and
further provided that mule account to co-accused Shridhar Ingle on
commission basis. He also provided his Kotak Bank account to
fraudsters and 2 NCRP complaints were found recorded against the said
bank account. The chat between the applicant and the co-accused
persons clearly establishes his role in the cyber fraud.
Bail Matter Nos. 1152/2026 and 1192/2026
1. Ajij Miran Sheikh vs. State
2. Archiryan Goraksh Kamble vs. State
e-FIR No. 24/2025
P. S: Cyber Police Station
U/s : 318(4)/112(2)/61(2) BNS
Page No.8 of 8
-- 5 of 8 --
9. It has been submitted that that both the applicants/accused persons
are in custody in this case since 29.01.2026. Ld. Counsel for the
applicants has stated that applicants have no criminal antecedents and the
applicants are also not a flight risk. The IO who was present through VC
stated that role of applicants are more or less same as that of co-accused
Vishal Durgadas Bachal and Pranav Jalinder Guldagad who have already
been admitted to bail by this court vide order dated 21.05.2026. He also
stated that cheated amount was not credited in the accounts of the
applicants/accused persons. It is also an admitted position that charge
sheet has already been filed and both the applicants are not required for
any further investigation.
10. Without commenting upon the merits of the case, it is an admitted
position that the cheated amount was not credited in the accounts of the
applicants/accused persons. The applicants/accused persons are in
custody in this case since 29.01.2026 i.e. they have suffered a custody of
more than 4 months. Charge sheet has already been filed and it seems
that they are not required for any further investigation. The applicants are
stated to have clean antecedents. The prosecution has also not raised any
serious apprehension that if applicants are admitted to bail then they are
flight risk or they may tamper with the evidence. It is also an admitted
position that co-accused Vishal Durgadas Bachal and Pranav Jalinder
Bail Matter Nos. 1152/2026 and 1192/2026
1. Ajij Miran Sheikh vs. State
2. Archiryan Goraksh Kamble vs. State
e-FIR No. 24/2025
P. S: Cyber Police Station
U/s : 318(4)/112(2)/61(2) BNS
Page No.8 of 8
-- 6 of 8 --
Guldagad have already been admitted to bail vide order dated
21.05.2026. In view of the above said discussion, period of custody and
without commenting upon the merits of the case, no fruitful purpose
would be served by keeping the above said applicants in further custody.
The applicants/accused persons 1) Ajij Miran Sheikh and 2) Archiryan
Goraksh Kamble are thus admitted to bail on furnishing a personal bond
in the sum of Rs.40,000/- each with one surety of the like amount each
subject to the satisfaction of Ld. CJM/Ld.Trial Court/Ld.Duty JMFC
subject to the following conditions:
a) The applicants/accused persons shall be regular to appear before
the ld.Trial court.
b) The applicants/accused persons shall not commit any similar
offence or any offence while on bail.
c) The applicants/accused persons shall not make any inducement,
threat or promise to any witness or person acquainted with the facts
of the present case and shall not try to tamper with any evidence.
d) The applicants/accused persons shall not misuse the liberty of bail
in any manner and shall not flee from justice.
e) The applicants/accused persons shall not leave India without the
prior permission of the ld. Trial Court.
11. It is clarified that if the applicants/accused persons would violate
any of the above said conditions of bail then the prosecution or the
Bail Matter Nos. 1152/2026 and 1192/2026
1. Ajij Miran Sheikh vs. State
2. Archiryan Goraksh Kamble vs. State
e-FIR No. 24/2025
P. S: Cyber Police Station
U/s : 318(4)/112(2)/61(2) BNS
Page No.8 of 8
-- 7 of 8 --
investigating agency shall be at liberty to move an application for
cancellation of bail of the accused persons.
12. The observations as made in this order are only for the disposal of
the present bail applications and these shall not be any reflection on the
merits of the case.
13. The present bail applications are disposed of accordingly.
14. Copy of this order be given dasti and be also sent to the concerned
Jail Superintendent for necessary information.
15. Signed copy of this order be placed in both the files.
16. Trial court record be sent back along with copy of the order.
(Amit Bansal)
Roster Judge, ASJ-02
NDD/PHC/New Delhi
05.06.2026
Bail Matter Nos. 1152/2026 and 1192/2026
1. Ajij Miran Sheikh vs. State
2. Archiryan Goraksh Kamble vs. State
e-FIR No. 24/2025
P. S: Cyber Police Station
U/s : 318(4)/112(2)/61(2) BNS
Page No.8 of 8
-- 8 of 8 --