Interim Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Bail Application No. 1098/2022
STATE Vs. ASHWANI KUMAR
FIR No. 299 /2020
PS SPECIAL CELL
U/Sec. 419/420/468/471/120B IPC &
66C/66D IT Act
20.06.2022
Present: Sh. R.K. Bhati, Ld. Addl.PP for the State.
Sh. Indresh Upadhyay and Sh. Saurabh Kumar, Ld.
Counsels for accused/applicant.
IO Insp. Sanjeev Solanki in person.
Reply filed by the IO.
Part arguments heard.
During the course of arguments, it is apprised by the
Ld. counsel for applicant that charge sheet in this case has
already been filed and no where in the charge sheet name of the
accused is surfaced whereas IO has submitted that applicant is
the main accused in this case since he was running a call centre
which was involved in alleged fraudulent activities.
On being enquired from the IO about his role in the
charge sheet as he has been termed as the main accused in this
case, he has failed to apprise on the ground that the previous IO
Insp. Praveen Kumar who investigated the matter initially and
filed the charge sheet is in a better position to explain about each
and every fact of this case.
Ld. Counsel for applicant has also furnished some
tenant verification form alongwith acknowledgement with the
bail application and submitted that premises was on rent of which
tenant verification also carried out by the concerned police
-- 1 of 2 --
station.
IO has submitted that same is merely a receiving and
not an actual verification of the tenant. Therefore, in this regard a
report about the tenant verification is also required be summoned
from the concerned PS Tilak Nagar and PS Hari Nagar.
Let notice be issued to the concerned SHO’s of those
police stations and let previous IO be also summoned on the next
date.
TCR be summoned for the next date.
Let this bail application be put up for arguments on
25.06.2022.
(Sanjay Khanagwal)
Vacation Judge
Spl. FTC/ASJ/PHC/ND
20.06.2022
-- 2 of 2 --