Full Order Text
Interim Order 7 · 12 Jul 2024 · CNR DLND010051002023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS (COMM.)/330/2023 CNR NO. : DLND010051002023 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Vs. KHAIRA TOURIST SERVICE AND ANR 12-07-2024 Present : Sh. Ritwik Chawla, Advocate for plaintiff ( Through V/c). None for defendants, despite calls. Heard. File perused. Report/ proceedings of Delhi Mediation Centre, PHC, New Delhi received as ‘not settled’. Ld. Counsel of plaintiff states at Bar that he has not received any written statement from the side of the defendants so far. He further submits that since, maximum period of 120 days has already expired from the date of service of summons and written statement has not been filed till date, the defence of the defendants may kindly be struck off. Record reveals that both the defendants were duly served with the summons of the suit on 31-10-2023 for 04-11-2023 i.e. the next date of hearing, on which, defendants put their appearance through counsel. It may be noted that as per the Proviso of Sub Rule 1 of Order V Rule 1 CPC as applicable to the Commercial Courts Act, the written statement has to be filed by the defendants within 30 days (extendable upto 120 days with the leave of the court and that too subject to appropriate terms) from the date of service of the process. However, the written statement has not been filed by defendants either within 30 days from the date of service or till CS (COMM.)/330/2023 Page 1 of 4 -- 1 of 4 -- date. Indisputably, maximum period of 120 days from the date of service has already expired. Now, it is no more res integra that in a commercial suit, the Court does not have power to condone the delay beyond 120 days. It would be apposite to reproduce the relevant portion of the judgment passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in case titled as SCG Contracts India Pvt. Ltd. v. K. S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., AIR 2019 SC 2691, to quote:- “A perusal of these provisions would show that ordinarily a written statement is to be filed within a period of 30 days. However, grace period of a further 90 days is granted which the Court may employ for reasons to be recorded in writing and payment of such costs as it deems fit to allow such written statement to come on record. What is of great importance is the fact that beyond 120 days from the date of service of summons, the Defendant shall forfeit the right to file the written statement and the Court shall not allow the written statement to be taken on record. This is further buttressed by the proviso in Order VIII Rule 10 also adding that the Court has no further power to extend the time beyond this period of 120 days. 10. Several High Court judgments on the amended Order VIII Rule 1 have now held that given the consequence of non-filing of written statement, the amended provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure will have to be held to be mandatory. [See Oku Tech Private Limited v. Sangeet Agarwal and Ors. by a learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court dated 11.08.2016 in CS (OS) No. 3390/2015 as followed by several other judgments including a judgment of the Delhi High Court in Maja Cosmetics v. Oasis Commercial Pvt. Ltd. MANU/DE/7868/2017. 11. We are of the view that the view taken by the Delhi High Court in these judgments is correct in view of the fact that the consequence of forfeiting a right to file the written statement; non-extension of any further time; and the fact that the Court shall not allow the written statement to be taken on record all points to the fact that the earlier law on Order VIII Rule 1 on the filing of written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 has now been set at naught.” Therefore, in the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the fact that written CS (COMM.)/330/2023 Page 2 of 4 -- 2 of 4 -- statement has not been filed by defendants either within statutory period of 30 days or within maximum period of 120 days from the date of service of the summons, the opportunity of both the defendants to file written statement is hereby closed. Consequently, the defence of the both the defendants is struck off. At this stage, it may be noted that as per plaint, the defendant no.1 M/s Khaira Tourist Service, the borrower, is stated to be a proprietorship firm of Sh. Satyendra Kumar. As per Memo of Parties, the defendant no.1 is shown as “ M/s Khaira Tourist Service through Its Proprietor Sh. Satyendra Kumar”, which is improper as it is settled legal proposition that the proprietorship firm is not a separate juristic person in the eyes of law and hence, cannot be sued in its own name. Thus, the defendant no.1 ought to have been shown as ‘Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Proprietor of M/s Khaira Tourist Service’ Counsel of plaintiff also concedes in this regard. In view of above, Ld. Counsel of plaintiff seeks and is permitted to file fresh amended memo of parties on record thereby incorporating ‘Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Proprietor of M/s Khaira Tourist Service’ as defendant no.1, within one week from date of this order. Be awaited till 12:30 p.m. for appearance of the defendants. (VIDYA PRAKASH) District Judge (Commercial Court)-02 Patiala House Court, New Delhi. 2nd Call at 12:35 p.m. Present : Sh. Ritwik Chawla, Advocate for plaintiff ( Through V/c). None for defendants, despite repeated calls. CS (COMM.)/330/2023 Page 3 of 4 -- 3 of 4 -- Be awaited till 02:00 p.m. for appearance of the defendants. (VIDYA PRAKASH) District Judge (Commercial Court)-02 Patiala House Court, New Delhi. 2nd Call at 02:15 p.m. Present : Sh. Ritwik Chawla, Counsel for plaintiff ( Through v/c). None for defendants, despite repeated calls since morning. Heard. File perused. In the totality of the facts and circumstances and keeping in view the fact that none has appeared on behalf of either of the defendants despite wait and repeated calls since morning, they are hereby proceeded against as ex parte. Plaintiff is directed to file list of witnesses within 2 weeks from date of this order. Put up for ex parte PE on 09-08-2024. (VIDYA PRAKASH) District Judge (Commercial Court)-02 Patiala House Court, New Delhi. 12-07-2024(r) CS (COMM.)/330/2023 Page 4 of 4 -- 4 of 4 --
