Final Order 3

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Bail Matter No. 1012/2026
Mandeep Singh Vs. State
FIR No. 32/2026
P. S: Cyber South West, New Delhi
U/s : 318(4)319 BNS
08.05.2026
This is an application u/s 483 BNSS filed on behalf of applicant/accused
Mandeep Singh for grant of regular bail.
Present: Sh. Irfan Ahmed, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
HC Naresh Kumar, IO of the case.
Sh. Vipul Verma and Sh. Anant Gupta, Ld. counsels for
applicant/accused.
Complainant/victim Mr.Juglal Yadav in person.
IO has also identified the complainant/Victim Mr. Juglal
Yadav.
Heard and record perused.
At this stage, complainant has submitted that he is the sole
victim of the present case and today he has received total cheated amount
of Rs.1,00,427/- from the side of applicant/accused i.e. Mandeep Singh
through demand draft in his name drawn on Axis Bank Ltd. He has also
placed on record copy of the said demand draft with endorsement of his
receiving with signatures and date. He has submitted that he has no
objection if the above said applicant/accused is admitted to bail in this case
and that he is making the said statement voluntarily and without any force
or coercion. Let the statement of the complainant/victim be recorded
separately in that regard. The statement has been recorded accordingly
which is as under:-
Contd...2.
-- 1 of 5 --
- 2 -
"Bail Matter No. 1012/2026
Mandeep Singh Vs. State
FIR No. 32/2026
P. S: Cyber South West, New Delhi
U/s : 318(4)/319 BNS
08.05.2026
Statement of Sh. Juglal Yadav son of Sh. Ramakant Yadav, aged About 40
Years, At present Resident of 107, Basant Gaon, Prajapati Mohalla, Vasant
Vihar, New Delhi-110057
On SA
I am the complainant and sole victim of the present case.
Today, I have received total cheated amount of Rs.1,00,427/- from the side
of applicant/accused, namely, Mandeep Singh vide demand draft
no.281215 dated 22.04.2026 in my name drawn on Axis Bank Ltd. I have
also placed on record copy of said demand draft with endorsement of my
receiving with signatures and date.
I have no objection if the above named applicant/accused is
admitted to bail in this case.
I am making the said statement voluntarily and without any
force or coercion."
The case of the prosecution in nutshell is that the FIR was
registered on the complaint of Mr.Juglal Yadav wherein he alleged that on
20.01.2026 he received multiple text messages from his bank regarding
unauthorized transactions from his HDFC Bank Account No.
50100746311442 and subsequently it was revealed that a total sum of
Rs.1,00,427/- had been fraudulently debited through 10 unauthorized
transactions.
Contd...3.
-- 2 of 5 --
- 3 -
Bail Matter No. 1012/2026
Mandeep Singh Vs. State
FIR No. 32/2026
P. S: Cyber South West, New Delhi
U/s : 318(4)319 BNS
During investigation, it was revealed that an amount of
approximately Rs. 70,000/- was transferred to Zomato Wallet. The details
of the said wallet were obtained which was found registered with Mobile
No.9546631005. The CDR analysis of said mobile number was condcuted
which was found operational in two mobile phones i.e. One Plus Mobile
Phone and Motorola Mobile Phone. On the basis of technical analysis and
electronic evidence, the user of said mobile number and mobile phones was
identified as the applicant. The applicant disclosed that he had come into
contact with one Telegram user, namely, 'Mr. X Pro' who told him to create
fraudulent phishing websites and links for cheating innocent persons in lieu
of monetary benefits. The aforesaid SIM number 9546631005 already
linked with the above said Zomato Wallet containing cheated money was
provided to the applicant by 'Mr. X Pro' in lieu of commission for his illegal
activities.
IO has submitted that during investigation, applicant revealed
that he has already formatted both the mobile phones, however, the said
mobile phones have been sent for data retrieval and forensic examination.
He, however, stated that applicant is in custody in this case since
14.04.2026 and he is not required for further investigation.
Ld. Counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant has
been falsely implicated in the present case, he has clean antecedents and
Contd...4.
-- 3 of 5 --
- 4 -
without prejudice to his rights and defence, he has already paid the total
cheated amount of Rs. 1,00,427/- to the complainant/victim through
demand draft.
Without commenting upon the merits of the case, it is an
admitted position that the complainant/victim has already received cheated
amount of Rs.1,00,427/- from applicant/accused. The applicant is in
custody in this case since 14.04.2026 i.e. he has already suffered a custody
of about 24 days in this case and it seems that he is not required for any
further investigation. The prosecution has also not raised any serious
apprehension that if applicant is admitted to bail then he is a flight risk or
he may tamper with the evidence. It has also been stated that the applicant
has clean antecedents. In view of the above said discussion, period of
custody, no objection to bail given by the complainant/victim and without
commencing upon the merits of the case, no fruitful purpose would be
served by keeping the above said applicant in further custody. The
applicant/accused, Mandeep Singh is thus admitted to bail on furnishing a
personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- with one surety of the like amount
subject to the satisfaction of Ld. CJM/Ld.Trial Court/Ld.Duty JMFC
subject to the following conditions:
a) The applicant/accused shall cooperate in the investigation and shall
join the investigation as and when required by IO / SHO concerned.
b) The applicant/accused shall not commit any similar offence or any
offence while on bail.
Contd...5.
-- 4 of 5 --
- 5 -
Bail Matter No. 1012/2026
Mandeep Singh Vs. State
FIR No. 32/2026
P. S: Cyber South West, New Delhi
U/s : 318(4)319 BNS
c) The applicant/accused shall not make any inducement, threat or
promise to any witness or person acquainted with the facts of the
present case and shall not try to tamper with any evidence.
d) The applicant/accused shall not misuse the liberty of bail in any
manner and shall not flee from justice.
e) The applicant/accused shall not leave India without the prior
permission of the ld. Trial Court.
It is clarified that if the applicant/accused would violate any of
the above said conditions of bail then the prosecution or the investigating
agency shall be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of bail of
the accused.
The observations as made in this order are only for the
disposal of the present bail application and these shall not be any reflection
on the merits of the case.
The present bail application is disposed of accordingly.
Copy of this order be given dasti and be also sent to the
concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary information.
(Amit Bansal)
Roster Judge, ASJ-02
NDD/PHC/New Delhi
08.05.2026
-- 5 of 5 --