Full Order Text
Final Order 3 · 14 May 2026 · CNR DLND010046882026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Bail Matter No. 954/2026 State Vs. Akram Ansari FIR No. 99/2025 P. S : Cyber South West, New Delhi U/s : 318(4)/319(2)/61(2)/3(5) BNS 14.05.2026 This is an application u/s 483 BNSS filed on behalf of applicant/accused Akram Ansari for grant of regular bail. Present: Sh. Irfan Ahmed, Ld. Addl. PP for State. SI Jagdeep Nara, IO of the case. Sh. Anwar Ahmad Khan, Ld. counsel for the applicant/accused (Through VC). Complainant/victim Sh.Vivek Pandey (Through VC) who has been identified as present through VC by the IO. Bar is reported to be abstaining from work for today. Sh. Ramesh, Ld. Advocate appointed from the side of the Bar to appear today in this court is present. 1. Reply already filed. 2. Heard and record perused. 3. It has been submitted on behalf of accused that although cheated amount has already been paid to the complainant/victim, however, to show his bonafide, he has further paid a sum of Rs.25,000/- to the complainant/victim through UPI. Copy of screenshot regarding payment of Rs.25,000/- to the complainant/victim Sh.Vivek Pandey has also been filed on record today. Contd...2. -- 1 of 5 -- - 2 - 4. Complainant present through VC has also confirmed that he has received the total cheated amount and further he has also received Rs.25,000/- through UPI from the side of the applicant/accused and he has no objection if the applicant/accused Md. Akram Ansari is admitted to bail in this case. 5. The case of the prosecution in nutshell is that the complainant/victim filed a NCRP complaint to the effect that on 28.08.2025, he had received a call regarding pending payment of BSES electricity bill and thereafter the scammers had sent him an APK file for payment of Rs. 13/- and thereby he was defrauded with an amount of Rs.1,41,485/- and Rs. 1,99,505/- from his Indusind and SBI Bank credit cards. 6. The role of accused Md.Akram Ansari is to the effect that he used to operate CSP IDs 1757110 and 1955613 (later in the name of his wife, Halima Khatoon). These CSP IDs were used for processing fraudulent financial transactions. He also facilitated the encashment of CDM (Cash Deposit Machine) receipts provided by co-accused persons. A total of 13 transactions amounting to Rs.9,50,000/- were credited and processed through his CSP IDs. The fraudulently obtained amount was further routed through CMS (Cash Management Services) and utilized for financial activities such as: EMI repayments, Bill payments, AEPS transactions. He acted in connivance with co-accused persons, namely, Contd...3. -- 2 of 5 -- - 3 - Bail Matter No. 954/2026 State Vs. Akram Ansari FIR No. 99/2025 P. S : Cyber South West, New Delhi U/s : 318(4)/319(2)/61(2)/3(5) BNS Kalim Ansari and Sagir Ansari and was part of the organized network involved in cyber fraud operations. 7. It has been submitted that that the applicant Md.Akram Ansari is in custody in this case since 19.03.2026. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has stated that applicant is not required for further investigation and further the total cheated amount has already been returned to the complainant/victim. He stated that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and the applicant is also not a flight risk. It has been submitted that co-accused persons, namely, Akash Goel, Shailu Kumar Pathak and Yash Mittal have already been granted bail in this case. 8. Without commenting upon the merits of the case, it is an admitted position that the complainant/victim has already received total cheated amount of this case. It is an admitted position that the applicant to show his bonafide has further paid Rs.25,000/- through UPI to the complainant/victim. The complainant/victim through VC has also given his no objection to grant of bail to the applicant in this case. The applicant Md.Akram Ansari is in custody in this case since 19.03.2026 i.e. he has suffered a custody of about 55 days. It seems that he is not required for any further investigation. The applicant is stated to have clean antecedents. The prosecution has also not raised any serious Contd...4. -- 3 of 5 -- - 4 - apprehension that if applicant is admitted to bail then he is flight risk or he may tamper with the evidence. In view of the above said discussion, period of custody, no objection to bail given by the complainant/victim and without commenting upon the merits of the case, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the above said applicant in further custody. The applicant/accused, Md. Akram Ansari is thus admitted to bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- with one surety of the like amount each subject to the satisfaction of Ld. CJM/Ld.Trial Court/Ld.Duty JMFC subject to the following conditions: a) The applicant/accused shall join the investigation as and when required by IO/SHO concerned. b) The applicant/accused shall not commit any similar offence or any offence while on bail. c) The applicant/accused shall not make any inducement, threat or promise to any witness or person acquainted with the facts of the present case and shall not try to tamper with any evidence. d) The applicant/accused shall not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner and shall not flee from justice. e) The applicant/accused shall not leave India without the prior permission of the ld. Trial Court. 9. It is clarified that if the applicant/accused would violate any of the above said conditions of bail then the prosecution or the investigating agency shall be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of bail of the accused. Contd...5. -- 4 of 5 -- - 5 - Bail Matter No. 954/2026 State Vs. Akram Ansari FIR No. 99/2025 P. S : Cyber South West, New Delhi U/s : 318(4)/319(2)/61(2)/3(5) BNS 10. The observations as made in this order are only for the disposal of the present bail application and these shall not be any reflection on the merits of the case. 11. The present bail application is disposed of accordingly. 12. Copy of this order be given dasti and be also sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary information. (Amit Bansal) Roster Judge, ASJ-02 NDD/PHC/New Delhi 14.05.2026 -- 5 of 5 --
