Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 3

CNR DLND01004688202614 May 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 3 · 14 May 2026 · CNR DLND010046882026

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Bail Matter No. 954/2026
State Vs. Akram Ansari
FIR No. 99/2025
P. S : Cyber South West, New Delhi
U/s : 318(4)/319(2)/61(2)/3(5) BNS
14.05.2026
This is an application u/s 483 BNSS filed on behalf of applicant/accused
Akram Ansari for grant of regular bail.
Present: Sh. Irfan Ahmed, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
SI Jagdeep Nara, IO of the case.
Sh. Anwar Ahmad Khan, Ld. counsel for the
applicant/accused (Through VC).
Complainant/victim Sh.Vivek Pandey (Through VC) who
has been identified as present through VC by the IO.
Bar is reported to be abstaining from work for today.
Sh. Ramesh, Ld. Advocate appointed from the side of the Bar
to appear today in this court is present.
1. Reply already filed.
2. Heard and record perused.
3. It has been submitted on behalf of accused that although
cheated amount has already been paid to the complainant/victim,
however, to show his bonafide, he has further paid a sum of Rs.25,000/-
to the complainant/victim through UPI. Copy of screenshot regarding
payment of Rs.25,000/- to the complainant/victim Sh.Vivek Pandey has
also been filed on record today.
Contd...2.
-- 1 of 5 --
- 2 -
4. Complainant present through VC has also confirmed that he
has received the total cheated amount and further he has also received
Rs.25,000/- through UPI from the side of the applicant/accused and he
has no objection if the applicant/accused Md. Akram Ansari is admitted to
bail in this case.
5. The case of the prosecution in nutshell is that the
complainant/victim filed a NCRP complaint to the effect that on
28.08.2025, he had received a call regarding pending payment of BSES
electricity bill and thereafter the scammers had sent him an APK file for
payment of Rs. 13/- and thereby he was defrauded with an amount of
Rs.1,41,485/- and Rs. 1,99,505/- from his Indusind and SBI Bank credit
cards.
6. The role of accused Md.Akram Ansari is to the effect that he
used to operate CSP IDs 1757110 and 1955613 (later in the name of his
wife, Halima Khatoon). These CSP IDs were used for processing
fraudulent financial transactions. He also facilitated the encashment of
CDM (Cash Deposit Machine) receipts provided by co-accused persons.
A total of 13 transactions amounting to Rs.9,50,000/- were credited and
processed through his CSP IDs. The fraudulently obtained amount was
further routed through CMS (Cash Management Services) and utilized
for financial activities such as: EMI repayments, Bill payments, AEPS
transactions. He acted in connivance with co-accused persons, namely,
Contd...3.
-- 2 of 5 --
- 3 -
Bail Matter No. 954/2026
State Vs. Akram Ansari
FIR No. 99/2025
P. S : Cyber South West, New Delhi
U/s : 318(4)/319(2)/61(2)/3(5) BNS
Kalim Ansari and Sagir Ansari and was part of the organized network
involved in cyber fraud operations.
7. It has been submitted that that the applicant Md.Akram
Ansari is in custody in this case since 19.03.2026. Ld. Counsel for the
applicant has stated that applicant is not required for further investigation
and further the total cheated amount has already been returned to the
complainant/victim. He stated that the applicant has no criminal
antecedents and the applicant is also not a flight risk. It has been
submitted that co-accused persons, namely, Akash Goel, Shailu Kumar
Pathak and Yash Mittal have already been granted bail in this case.
8. Without commenting upon the merits of the case, it is an
admitted position that the complainant/victim has already received total
cheated amount of this case. It is an admitted position that the applicant
to show his bonafide has further paid Rs.25,000/- through UPI to the
complainant/victim. The complainant/victim through VC has also given
his no objection to grant of bail to the applicant in this case. The
applicant Md.Akram Ansari is in custody in this case since 19.03.2026
i.e. he has suffered a custody of about 55 days. It seems that he is not
required for any further investigation. The applicant is stated to have
clean antecedents. The prosecution has also not raised any serious
Contd...4.
-- 3 of 5 --
- 4 -
apprehension that if applicant is admitted to bail then he is flight risk or
he may tamper with the evidence. In view of the above said discussion,
period of custody, no objection to bail given by the complainant/victim
and without commenting upon the merits of the case, no fruitful purpose
would be served by keeping the above said applicant in further custody.
The applicant/accused, Md. Akram Ansari is thus admitted to bail on
furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- with one surety of
the like amount each subject to the satisfaction of Ld. CJM/Ld.Trial
Court/Ld.Duty JMFC subject to the following conditions:
a) The applicant/accused shall join the investigation as and
when required by IO/SHO concerned.
b) The applicant/accused shall not commit any similar offence or any
offence while on bail.
c) The applicant/accused shall not make any inducement, threat or
promise to any witness or person acquainted with the facts of the
present case and shall not try to tamper with any evidence.
d) The applicant/accused shall not misuse the liberty of bail in any
manner and shall not flee from justice.
e) The applicant/accused shall not leave India without the prior
permission of the ld. Trial Court.
9. It is clarified that if the applicant/accused would violate any
of the above said conditions of bail then the prosecution or the
investigating agency shall be at liberty to move an application for
cancellation of bail of the accused.
Contd...5.
-- 4 of 5 --
- 5 -
Bail Matter No. 954/2026
State Vs. Akram Ansari
FIR No. 99/2025
P. S : Cyber South West, New Delhi
U/s : 318(4)/319(2)/61(2)/3(5) BNS
10. The observations as made in this order are only for the
disposal of the present bail application and these shall not be any
reflection on the merits of the case.
11. The present bail application is disposed of accordingly.
12.
Copy of this order be given dasti and be also sent to the
concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary information.
(Amit Bansal)
Roster Judge, ASJ-02
NDD/PHC/New Delhi
14.05.2026
-- 5 of 5 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.