Skip to main content
Bail Matters - Bail Case Type

STATEVsSWATI PATEL

CNR DLND01004185202121-
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--DISPOSED
Decision Date: 06th July 2021

TrustJury record updated 10 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
1295/2021
Registration Date
19 Jun 2021

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1STATE

    Respondent

    1. 1SWATI PATEL

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Indian Penal Code · Sec 384

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Parliament Street
    FIR Number / Year
    27/2021

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 21-06-2021
    Business: Put up on 26.06.2021.
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 26-06-2021
    
    Date: 26-06-2021
    Business: Put up on 06.07.2021 for arguments on bail application.
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 06-07-2021
    
    Date: 06-07-2021
    Business: Disposed of.;
    Nature Of Disposal: DISPOSED
    Disposal Date: 06-07-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 1825/2021
    Filing Date: 19-06-2021
    First Hearing Date: 21st June 2021
    Decision Date: 06th July 2021
    Court Number And Judge: 21-

    Orders

    5
    Final Order 3Full order available
    06 Jul 2021

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Bail Application No.1294/2021 State vs. Amar Singh Bail Application No.1295/2021 State vs. Swati Patel FIR No.27/2021 U/s 384/389 IPC PS: Parliament Street 06.07.2021 Present : Sh. Dharam Chand, Addl. PP for State, through VC. IO/SI Satyender Singh Yadav from Special Staff, New Delhi, through VC. Sh. Ratnesh Deo and Sh. Anuj Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for complainant Prince Raj, through VC. Sh. Bhuwanesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for applicants/accused Amar Singh and Swati Patel, through…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 2
    26 Jun 2021
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: Bail Application No.1294/2021
    State vs. Amar Singh
    Bail Application No.1295/2021
    State vs. Swati Patel
    FIR No.27/2021
    U/s 384/389 IPC
    PS: Parliament Street
    26.06.2021
    Present : Sh. Dharam Chand, Addl. PP for State, through VC.
    IO/SI Satyender Singh Yadav from Special Staff, New Delhi,
    through VC.
    Sh. Ratnesh Deo, Ld. Counsel for complainant Prince Raj,
    through VC.
    Sh. Bhuwanesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for applicants/accused Amar
    Singh and Swati Patel, through VC.
    Separate applications u/s 438 Cr.PC for grant of anticipatory bail
    have been filed on behalf of applicant/accused Amar Singh and Swati Patel.
    Separate replies to the bail applications have also been filed.
    DCP, New Delhi District, New Delhi, has sent a letter dated
    25.06.2021 seeks some more time for completion of enquiry as directed to be
    conduced vide this court order dated 21.06.2021. Matter is therefore, adjourned.
    Renotify for arguments on the bail applications on 06.07.2021.
    (Parveen Singh)
    ASJ03/NDD/PHC/New Delhi
    26.06.2021
    (Through VC)
    -- 1 of 2 --
    It is certified that Video Conferencing was held in an uninterrupted
    manner and during the proceedings, no objections were raised by either of the
    parties regarding the connectivity i.e. audio or visual quality.
    (Reader)
    26.06.2021
    -- 2 of 2 --
    Interim Order 1Full order available
    21 Jun 2021

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Bail Application No.1294/2021 State vs. Amar Singh Bail Application No.1295/2021 State vs. Swati Patel FIR No.27/2021 U/s 384/389 IPC PS: Parliament Street 21.06.2021 Present : Sh. Dharam Chand, Addl. PP for State, through VC. IO/SI Satyender Singh Yadav from Special Staff, New Delhi, through VC. Sh. Ratnesh Deo, Ld. Counsel for complainant Prince Raj, through VC. Sh. Bhuwanesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for applicants/accused Amar Singh and Swati Patel, through VC. Separate applications u/s…

    Read Full Order
    Order 2
    26 Jun 2021
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: Bail Application No.1294/2021
    State vs. Amar Singh
    Bail Application No.1295/2021
    State vs. Swati Patel
    FIR No.27/2021
    U/s 384/389 IPC
    PS: Parliament Street
    26.06.2021
    Present : Sh. Dharam Chand, Addl. PP for State, through VC.
    IO/SI Satyender Singh Yadav from Special Staff, New Delhi,
    through VC.
    Sh. Ratnesh Deo, Ld. Counsel for complainant Prince Raj,
    through VC.
    Sh. Bhuwanesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for applicants/accused Amar
    Singh and Swati Patel, through VC.
    Separate applications u/s 438 Cr.PC for grant of anticipatory bail
    have been filed on behalf of applicant/accused Amar Singh and Swati Patel.
    Separate replies to the bail applications have also been filed.
    DCP, New Delhi District, New Delhi, has sent a letter dated
    25.06.2021 seeks some more time for completion of enquiry as directed to be
    conduced vide this court order dated 21.06.2021. Matter is therefore, adjourned.
    Renotify for arguments on the bail applications on 06.07.2021.
    (Parveen Singh)
    ASJ03/NDD/PHC/New Delhi
    26.06.2021
    (Through VC)
    -- 1 of 2 --
    It is certified that Video Conferencing was held in an uninterrupted
    manner and during the proceedings, no objections were raised by either of the
    parties regarding the connectivity i.e. audio or visual quality.
    (Reader)
    26.06.2021
    -- 2 of 2 --
    Order 1Full order available
    21 Jun 2021

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Bail Application No.1294/2021 State vs. Amar Singh Bail Application No.1295/2021 State vs. Swati Patel FIR No.27/2021 U/s 384/389 IPC PS: Parliament Street 21.06.2021 Present : Sh. Dharam Chand, Addl. PP for State, through VC. IO/SI Satyender Singh Yadav from Special Staff, New Delhi, through VC. Sh. Ratnesh Deo, Ld. Counsel for complainant Prince Raj, through VC. Sh. Bhuwanesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for applicants/accused Amar Singh and Swati Patel, through VC. Separate applications u/s…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.