Interim Order 3

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 CS (COMM.) 211/26
Hippostores Technology Private Limited Vs. M/s Prime Builders
29.07.2026 (At 11:10AM)
Present: Sh. Harish Malik, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Speed post sent to defendant at second given address
has been received back with endorsement of refusal. Summon
meant for 05.05.2026, sent through Nazarat Branch, has also been
received back with report that summon was received at concerned
court for the second given address, after the date of hearing. The
plaintiff has filed one application under Order V Rule 9 CPC along
with one purchase order to show reference to same WhatsApp
number and second given address of defendant, in the said
purchase order. As per this purchase order defendant is shown to
be having same address as mentioned in the memo of parties (2nd
address) and the same WhatsApp number. Ld. counsel submits that
at same address materials were delivered to the defendant.
Defendant was already served through WhatsApp on 03.04.2026
and 06.04.2026. Now with receipt of speed post from second
address with endorsement of refusal, it is apparent that defendant
is deliberately avoiding service through other modes. Defendant
shall accordingly be deemed to be served through WhatsApp on
03.04.2026. Till date neither the defendant has appeared nor any
written statement has been filed. In these circumstances,
opportunity of defendant to file written statement stands closed.
-- 1 of 2 --
On next date, witness of the plaintiff shall appear with
all original documents for PE/final submissions.
Put up for 08.12.2026.
Pulastya Pramachala
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
29.07.2026 (HL)
-- 2 of 2 --