CS (COMM.) - CIVIL SUIT (COMMERCIAL)
Ultratech Cement Ltd.VsTHEINDOGRID INFRA PVT. LTD.
CNR DLND010026732026762-District Judge (Commercial Courts)-01
Patiala House Court - District sessions Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING
TrustJury record updated 10 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 202/2026
- Registration Date
- 19 Mar 2026
- Next Hearing Date
- 27 Oct 2026
- Case Stage
- Misc. cases
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Recovery of Money · Sec 12
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 19-03-2026 Business: Fresh Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 22-04-2026 Date: 22-04-2026 Business: for further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 01-06-2026 Date: 01-06-2026 Business: for further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 24-08-2026 Date: 24-08-2026 Business: Application disposed Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 1751/2026 Filing Date: 13-03-2026 eFiling Number: ADL20230001609C202600011 eFiling Date: 13-03-2026 First Hearing Date: 19th March 2026 Court Number And Judge: 762-District Judge (Commercial Courts)-01
Orders
8Interim Order 424 Aug 2026
24 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 7 CS (COMM.) 202/26 ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. Vs. THEINDOGRID INFRA PVT. LTD. 24.08.2026 Present: Sh. Gurvinder Singh, Counsel for plaintiff. An application has been filed by the plaintiff for substitution of AR of the plaintiff on the ground that the previous AR Mr. Sandeep Kumar has been transferred to some other state and Plaintiff wants to substitute Sh. Ashok Singh in his place. Copy of SPA dated 25.03.2026 in favour of the new attorney has been filed along with the application. In view of the reasons given in the application, application is allowed. Sh. Ashosk Singh is substituted as AR of plaintiff company. Application stands disposed of Put up for filing of amended plaint and for further consideration on 27.10.2026. (Anil Kumar Sisodia) District Judge (Commercial Court-01), Patiala House Courts Complex, New Delhi/24.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 301 Jun 2026
01 Jun 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 7 CS (COMM.) 202/26 ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. Vs. THEINDOGRID INFRA PVT. LTD. 01.06.2026 (At 10:52 AM) Present : Sh. Gurvinder Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. One amended plaint along with fresh Statement of Truth, Affidavit U/s. 63 BSA, Declaration U/o. 11 Rule 6 CPC and Court fee of Rs. 8,844/- have been tendered. I have perused the amended plaint. I find that the plaint does not disclose all basic facts in respect of all the invoices. In the prayer clause, interest has been claimed from the respective due dates. However, the plaint is totally silent in respect of those due dates and the amount of such interest. Plaintiff has to not only plead about such interest but has also to plead complete calculation and has to pay court fee on that interest component also for the period till filing of this Suit. Ld. Counsel seeks another opportunity to come up with fresh amended plaint. Another opportunity is given. The amended plaint with fresh Statement of Truth shall be filed before or upto NDOH. Put up on 24.08.2026. Pulastya Pramachala District Judge (Commercial Court)-01 Patiala House Court, New Delhi. 01.06.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 222 Apr 2026
22 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 14 CS (COMM.) 202/26 ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. Vs. THEINDOGRID INFRA PVT. LTD. 22.04.2026 (At 10:56 AM) Present: Sh. Gurvinder Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Despite given opportunity, plaintiff did not bother to pay the complete court fee and the court fee still remains deficient. Plaintiff was already given directions to rectify the plaint because there had been number of defects in the plaint including half-hearted pleadings made about valuation of this suit and ignoring to plead about particular court fee being payable. Ld. counsel submits that AR of plaintiff has been changed, and therefore, rectified plaint could not be prepared. Adjournment sought. Last opportunity is given to ensure that not only the pleadings are rectified strictly in accordance with provisions of Commercial Courts Act, but also to pay deficient court fee to ensure that complete court fee as per amount claimed in this suit has been paid. Case is adjourned subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- to be deposited in DLSA, New Delhi. Put up on 01.06.2026. (Pulastya Pramachala) District Judge (Commercial Court-01), Patiala House Courts Complex, New Delhi/22.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 119 Mar 2026
19 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 24 CS (COMM.) 202/26 Ultratech Cement Ltd. Vs. Theindogrid Infra Pvt. Ltd. 19.03.2026 (At 2:30PM) Fresh suit is received by way of random allocation. It be checked and registered. Present : Sh. Gurvinder Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Certificate under Section 63 is not as per format. Statement of Truth and verification clause are hand filled/corrections without any authentication. All rectifications be done in advance, that too strictly in accordance with Commercial Courts Act. There is deficiency in court fees. Ld. counsel for plaintiff undertakes to pay the deficient court fees. Same be paid by the next date of hearing. Put up on 22.04.2026. Pulastya Pramachala District Judge (Commercial Court)-01 Patiala House Court, New Delhi. 19.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 424 Aug 2026
24 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 7 CS (COMM.) 202/26 ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. Vs. THEINDOGRID INFRA PVT. LTD. 24.08.2026 Present: Sh. Gurvinder Singh, Counsel for plaintiff. An application has been filed by the plaintiff for substitution of AR of the plaintiff on the ground that the previous AR Mr. Sandeep Kumar has been transferred to some other state and Plaintiff wants to substitute Sh. Ashok Singh in his place. Copy of SPA dated 25.03.2026 in favour of the new attorney has been filed along with the application. In view of the reasons given in the application, application is allowed. Sh. Ashosk Singh is substituted as AR of plaintiff company. Application stands disposed of Put up for filing of amended plaint and for further consideration on 27.10.2026. (Anil Kumar Sisodia) District Judge (Commercial Court-01), Patiala House Courts Complex, New Delhi/24.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 301 Jun 2026
01 Jun 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 7 CS (COMM.) 202/26 ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. Vs. THEINDOGRID INFRA PVT. LTD. 01.06.2026 (At 10:52 AM) Present : Sh. Gurvinder Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. One amended plaint along with fresh Statement of Truth, Affidavit U/s. 63 BSA, Declaration U/o. 11 Rule 6 CPC and Court fee of Rs. 8,844/- have been tendered. I have perused the amended plaint. I find that the plaint does not disclose all basic facts in respect of all the invoices. In the prayer clause, interest has been claimed from the respective due dates. However, the plaint is totally silent in respect of those due dates and the amount of such interest. Plaintiff has to not only plead about such interest but has also to plead complete calculation and has to pay court fee on that interest component also for the period till filing of this Suit. Ld. Counsel seeks another opportunity to come up with fresh amended plaint. Another opportunity is given. The amended plaint with fresh Statement of Truth shall be filed before or upto NDOH. Put up on 24.08.2026. Pulastya Pramachala District Judge (Commercial Court)-01 Patiala House Court, New Delhi. 01.06.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 222 Apr 2026
22 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 14 CS (COMM.) 202/26 ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. Vs. THEINDOGRID INFRA PVT. LTD. 22.04.2026 (At 10:56 AM) Present: Sh. Gurvinder Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Despite given opportunity, plaintiff did not bother to pay the complete court fee and the court fee still remains deficient. Plaintiff was already given directions to rectify the plaint because there had been number of defects in the plaint including half-hearted pleadings made about valuation of this suit and ignoring to plead about particular court fee being payable. Ld. counsel submits that AR of plaintiff has been changed, and therefore, rectified plaint could not be prepared. Adjournment sought. Last opportunity is given to ensure that not only the pleadings are rectified strictly in accordance with provisions of Commercial Courts Act, but also to pay deficient court fee to ensure that complete court fee as per amount claimed in this suit has been paid. Case is adjourned subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- to be deposited in DLSA, New Delhi. Put up on 01.06.2026. (Pulastya Pramachala) District Judge (Commercial Court-01), Patiala House Courts Complex, New Delhi/22.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 119 Mar 2026
19 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 24 CS (COMM.) 202/26 Ultratech Cement Ltd. Vs. Theindogrid Infra Pvt. Ltd. 19.03.2026 (At 2:30PM) Fresh suit is received by way of random allocation. It be checked and registered. Present : Sh. Gurvinder Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Certificate under Section 63 is not as per format. Statement of Truth and verification clause are hand filled/corrections without any authentication. All rectifications be done in advance, that too strictly in accordance with Commercial Courts Act. There is deficiency in court fees. Ld. counsel for plaintiff undertakes to pay the deficient court fees. Same be paid by the next date of hearing. Put up on 22.04.2026. Pulastya Pramachala District Judge (Commercial Court)-01 Patiala House Court, New Delhi. 19.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
