M/S ORANGESTAR LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.VsM/S CARGO CARE SERVICES

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 CS (COMM.) 271/25
M/s Orangestar Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s Cargo Care Services
18.04.2026 (At 10:09AM)
Present : Sh. Ravinder Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through video conferencing with Sh. Yuvraj Gupta,
Associate Counsel with AR Sh. Sanjeet Das.
Application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC along with
proposed amended plaint have been filed. I have perused the
proposed amended plaint. In this plaint, I do not find any details of
invoices against which recovery has been sought. In the relevant
paragraph, instead of explaining the limitation, simplicitor
declaration has been given that suit is within limitation. There is no
pleading so as to show that how this suit is covered as a
commercial suit. Plaintiff is advised to go through the relevant
provisions of Commercial Courts Act and rule of pleadings and to
come up with complete factual pleadings in the plaint itself.
Put up on 17.07.2026.
Pulastya Pramachala
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
18.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) 271/25
M/s Oranestar Logistics (P) Ltd Vs. M/s Cargo Sales Service
17.03.2026 ( At 2.20 PM)
Present: Sh Ravinder Kumar, Ld counsel for plaintiff (through
VC).
Though the amended plaint was tendered, but it has
been taken back for the purpose of authentication of
some alteration by the AR.
Put up on 18.04.2026.
(Pulastya Pramachala)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/17.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 CS (COMM.) 271/25
M/S ORANGESTAR LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. v. M/S CARGO
CARE SERVICES
28.01.2026 (At 11:12 a.m.)
Present: Sh. Ravinder Kumar (appearing through V/C), ld.
counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff seeks time to file amended
memo of parties, so as to implead proprietor as defendant in the
matter, in place of proprietorship firm. Same be done in advance.
Put up on 17.03.2026, for submissions on amended
plaint.
(Pulastya Pramachala)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/28.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10 CS (COMM.) 271/25
M/S ORANGESTAR LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. VS. M/S CARGO
CARE SERVICES
01.09.2025 (At 10.55 AM)
Present : Sh. Ravinder Kumar (appearing through V/C), ld.
Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Yuvraj, Associate in the court.
A fresh application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC
along with proposed amended plaint was filed online. Hard copy
of the same has been filed today. One application under Order XI
Rule 1 CPC was also filed.
On perusal of the proposed amended plaint, I find
that a proprietorship firm has been impleaded as defendant. Ld.
Counsel for plaintiff is invited to make his submissions if a
proprietorship firm can be suit. Ld. Counsel seeks time.
Put up for the same on 29.10.2025.
(Pulastya Pramachala)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/01.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 271/25
M/S ORANGESTAR LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. Vs. M/S CARGO
CARE SERVICES
09.06.2025 (At 10:53 AM)
Present: Sh. Ravinder Kumar (appearing through V/C), ld.
Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Amit Sharma, Advocate for plaintiff.
On last date, court had granted two week’s time to the
plaintiff to file rectified plaint, but it was not so done. Even
today, an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC with proposed
amended plaint has been filed, but that plaint also suffers from
incorrect narration of factual aspect (para-21).
On request, another opportunity, which shall be the
last opportunity for the plaintiff, is given to file properly signed
and factually corrected plaint in accordance with law up to next
date.
Case is adjourned subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- to be
deposited with DLSA, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.
Put up on 01.09.2025.
(Pulastya Pramachala)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/09.06.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 271/24
M/S B. L. M STEELS Vs. HSK INFRA PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
08.04.2025
Present : Sh. Dinesh Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through video conferencing.
Sh. Rohit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
It is stated by both the parties that another matter is
still pending before the Mediation Centre and talks for amicable
settlement are going on and the next date fixed in the matter
before the Mediation Centre is 07.05.2025.
Both the parties requests that matter be kept
thereafter.
On joint request, put up this matter for settlement, if
any/arguments on application under Order XXXVII rule 3 (5)
CPC.
Renotify the matter on 21.05.2025.
Anurag Sain
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
08.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 4 CS (COMM.) 271/25
M/S ORANGESTAR LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.
Vs.
M/S CARGO CARE SERVICES
18.09.2026
Present: Sh. Ravinder Kumar (VC) and Sh. Yuvraj Gupta,
Ld. Counsels for the plaintiff (VC).
Ordinary process remains awaited. Electronic process
could not be issued as PF was filed with an affidavit without
furnishing requisite information.
Affidavit vouching for verified Email ID and WhatApp
number of defendant not furnished alongwith PF.
Plaintiff is granted one last opportunity to furnish
requisite information alongwith PF within a week
subject to cost of
Rs. 3000/- to be deposited with DLSA, Patiala House Courts, Delhi.
Receipt of the deposition of the cost be furnished in the court. It is
specified that if steps not taken by the plaintiff, the suit shall be
dismissed for non-prosecution.
In view thereof, issue fresh summons of the suit to the
defendant by all permissible modes including electronic modes on
filing of PF/RC/Speed Post/Courier/WhatsApp/Email. Plaintiff shall
also file the PDF of the complete set of paper book to be served along
with the summons electronically.
Put up for compliance on 27.11.2026.
(Anil Antil)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01)
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/18.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 CS (COMM.) 271/25
M/s Orangestar Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s Cargo Care Services
18.04.2026 (At 10:09AM)
Present : Sh. Ravinder Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through video conferencing with Sh. Yuvraj Gupta,
Associate Counsel with AR Sh. Sanjeet Das.
Application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC along with
proposed amended plaint have been filed. I have perused the
proposed amended plaint. In this plaint, I do not find any details of
invoices against which recovery has been sought. In the relevant
paragraph, instead of explaining the limitation, simplicitor
declaration has been given that suit is within limitation. There is no
pleading so as to show that how this suit is covered as a
commercial suit. Plaintiff is advised to go through the relevant
provisions of Commercial Courts Act and rule of pleadings and to
come up with complete factual pleadings in the plaint itself.
Put up on 17.07.2026.
Pulastya Pramachala
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
18.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) 271/25
M/s Oranestar Logistics (P) Ltd Vs. M/s Cargo Sales Service
17.03.2026 ( At 2.20 PM)
Present: Sh Ravinder Kumar, Ld counsel for plaintiff (through
VC).
Though the amended plaint was tendered, but it has
been taken back for the purpose of authentication of
some alteration by the AR.
Put up on 18.04.2026.
(Pulastya Pramachala)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/17.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 CS (COMM.) 271/25
M/S ORANGESTAR LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. v. M/S CARGO
CARE SERVICES
28.01.2026 (At 11:12 a.m.)
Present: Sh. Ravinder Kumar (appearing through V/C), ld.
counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff seeks time to file amended
memo of parties, so as to implead proprietor as defendant in the
matter, in place of proprietorship firm. Same be done in advance.
Put up on 17.03.2026, for submissions on amended
plaint.
(Pulastya Pramachala)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/28.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10 CS (COMM.) 271/25
M/S ORANGESTAR LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. VS. M/S CARGO
CARE SERVICES
01.09.2025 (At 10.55 AM)
Present : Sh. Ravinder Kumar (appearing through V/C), ld.
Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Yuvraj, Associate in the court.
A fresh application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC
along with proposed amended plaint was filed online. Hard copy
of the same has been filed today. One application under Order XI
Rule 1 CPC was also filed.
On perusal of the proposed amended plaint, I find
that a proprietorship firm has been impleaded as defendant. Ld.
Counsel for plaintiff is invited to make his submissions if a
proprietorship firm can be suit. Ld. Counsel seeks time.
Put up for the same on 29.10.2025.
(Pulastya Pramachala)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/01.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 271/25
M/S ORANGESTAR LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. Vs. M/S CARGO
CARE SERVICES
09.06.2025 (At 10:53 AM)
Present: Sh. Ravinder Kumar (appearing through V/C), ld.
Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Amit Sharma, Advocate for plaintiff.
On last date, court had granted two week’s time to the
plaintiff to file rectified plaint, but it was not so done. Even
today, an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC with proposed
amended plaint has been filed, but that plaint also suffers from
incorrect narration of factual aspect (para-21).
On request, another opportunity, which shall be the
last opportunity for the plaintiff, is given to file properly signed
and factually corrected plaint in accordance with law up to next
date.
Case is adjourned subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- to be
deposited with DLSA, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.
Put up on 01.09.2025.
(Pulastya Pramachala)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/09.06.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 271/24
M/S B. L. M STEELS Vs. HSK INFRA PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
08.04.2025
Present : Sh. Dinesh Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through video conferencing.
Sh. Rohit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
It is stated by both the parties that another matter is
still pending before the Mediation Centre and talks for amicable
settlement are going on and the next date fixed in the matter
before the Mediation Centre is 07.05.2025.
Both the parties requests that matter be kept
thereafter.
On joint request, put up this matter for settlement, if
any/arguments on application under Order XXXVII rule 3 (5)
CPC.
Renotify the matter on 21.05.2025.
Anurag Sain
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
08.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --