Order 15

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10
CS 118/21
ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA
S/O LATE SH LAXMAN DASS GUPTA Vs.
SAV LOGISTICS LIMITED
25.03.2026
Present: Sh. Kuldeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff.
None for the Defendant.
An application for waiver of cost has been moved on
behalf of the plaintiff on the ground that plaintiff herein is a jobless
senior citizen.
On the last date of hearing, cost was imposed upon the
plaintiff for wasting precious judicial time. Time is a precious judicial
entity which ought to be sagaciously invested in expeditious disposal
of
lis pending before the court. Even on the last date of hearing, the
plaintiff herein was a senior citizen and it is not as if he has become
jobless only after imposition of cost. In case if the plaintiff is a senior
citizen and is facing some financial constraints, he should have been
all the more diligent in prosecuting his suit. I do not find any merits in
the application at hand. The application for waiver of cost stands
dismissed.
Plaintiff is directed to pay the cost by next date of
hearing.
Counsel for the plaintiff has placed on record another
application in the form of execution petition. At the very outset,
counsel for the plaintiff submits that he is not pressing upon said
application and shall be filing a separate execution petition for the
same.
In view of the same, the said application stands
dismissed as not pressed.
-- 1 of 2 --
Affidavit of admission-denial of documents filed on
behalf of the plaintiff. Affidavit of admission-denial of documents on
behalf of the defendant is already on record.
The defendant has admitted following documents:-
S.No. Documents Exhibits
1. Copy of Termination letter Ex. P-1
2. Copy of salary due acceptance
letter
Ex. P-2
3. Copy of salary ledger from
company accounts
Ex. P-3
All other documents were denied by the defendant.
The plaintiff has not admitted any of the documents filed
by the defendant.
Pleadings are complete. From pleadings of the parties,
following issues are framed:-
1. Whether plaintiff is entitled to recover the balance sum of
Rs.4,68,566/- (
after adjustment of part decree passed on
13.08.2025), from the defendant? OPP
2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to any interest on decretal
amount? If yes, at what rate and for what period? OPP
3. Relief.
No other issue either arises or is being pressed for. List
of witnesses be filed within a fortnight from today by both the parties
with copies exchanged.
List for PE in the matter on 11.08.2026. Advance copy
of affidavit of examination-in-chief be shared with the opposite side at
least a fortnight before the next date of hearing.
(Dharmender Rana)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/25.03.2026
-- 2 of 2 --