Final Order 3

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF SH.AMIT BANSAL
ASJ-02, PATIALA HOUSE COURT, NEW DELHI
Bail Matter No. 324/2026
STATE Vs. Karan Singh Karki
FIR No. 48/2025
P. S : Cyber South West
U/s : 318(4)/319 BNS
20.02.2026
O R D E R
1. This order shall dispose of an application u/s 483 BNSS filed on
behalf of applicant/accused Karan Singh Karki for grant of regular bail.
2. I have already heard the arguments and perused the record.
3. Reply to the bail application has already been filed.
4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused Karan Singh Karki has
submitted that the applicant is in custody in this case since 24.12.2025,
the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and he is not required
for any further investigation. He further submitted that the applicant has
already today voluntarily paid Rs.28,760/- to the victim Mr.Mayank
Shukla through UPI payment and the victim and complainant have also
given their no objection, if applicant is admitted to bail in this case. He
also stated that the applicant has no criminal antecedents. He thus prayed
that the applicant be admitted to bail in this case.
Bail Matter No. 324/2026
STATE Vs. Karan Singh Karki
FIR No. 48/2025
P. S : Cyber South West
U/s : 318(4)/319 BNS
Page No. 5 of 5
-- 1 of 5 --
5. Per contra, ld. Addl. PP for State has submitted that the victim has
been cheated of Rs. 1.03 Lakhs on the pretext of investment through fake
online platforms. During investigation, it was found that out of the total
cheated amount, a sum of Rs. 28,760/- was transferred to PNB Bank
Account No. 4740000100024868 which was found registered in the name
of the applicant. He stated that the applicant has supplied his above said
PNB bank account (beneficiary of Rs.28,760/-) to co-accused Abhishek
Sharma for commission, who further supplied it to one Shivam. He
submitted that co-accused Abhishek Sharma has been arrested while co-
accused Shivam is yet to be traced. Upon enquiry from the IO, ld. Addl.
PP for State has submitted that the charge sheet would be filed within a
day or two and that the applicant has clean antecedents.
6. The complainant Mr. Abhishek Shukla and victim Mr.Mayank
Shukla are also present in the court who have been identified by the IO
HC Ramprasad. The said complainant and victim stated that the victim
has today received part cheated amount of Rs. 28,760/- from the
applicant/accused Karan Singh Karki through UPI payment. They
specifically stated that they have no objection if the applicant/accused
Karan Singh Karki is admitted to bail in this case. Their joint statement
was also recorded which is as under:-
Bail Matter No. 324/2026
STATE Vs. Karan Singh Karki
FIR No. 48/2025
P. S : Cyber South West
U/s : 318(4)/319 BNS
Page No. 5 of 5
-- 2 of 5 --
“20.02.2026
Joint statement of Sh. Mayank Shukla (Victim) son of Sh. Sanjay Kumar
Shukla, Aged about 25 Years and Sh. Abhishek Shukla (complainant) son
of Sh.Sanjay Kumar Shukla, Aged about 29 Years, At present Resident of
1606, Sector-5, R.K.Puram, New Delhi
On SA
We are the victim and complainant of the present case. The
victim has today received part cheated amount of Rs. 28,760/- from the
applicant/accused Karan Singh Karki through UPI payment.
We have no objection if the applicant/accused Karan Singh
Karki is admitted to bail in this case.
We are making the said statement voluntarily and without any
force or coercion.”
7. The case of the prosecution in nutshell has already been mentioned
in the submissions of ld. Addl. PP for State and the same is not being
repeated for the sake of brevity.
8. The role of accused Karan Singh Karki in nutshell is to the effect
that out of total cheated amount, a sum of Rs. 28,760/- was transferred in
his PNB Bank Account No. 4740000100024868, he had supplied his said
account to co-accused Abhishek Sharma (already arrested) for
commission who further supplied it to one Shivam.
9. Without commenting upon the merits of the case, it is an admitted
position that the victim has today received part cheated amount of Rs.
Bail Matter No. 324/2026
STATE Vs. Karan Singh Karki
FIR No. 48/2025
P. S : Cyber South West
U/s : 318(4)/319 BNS
Page No. 5 of 5
-- 3 of 5 --
28,960/- from applicant/accused Karan Singh Karki. The complainant and
victim have already given their no objection to the grant of bail to the
applicant – Karan Singh Karki. It is also an admitted position that the
applicant Karan Singh Karki is in custody in this case since 24.12.2025
i.e. he has already suffered a custody of about two months in this case and
it seems that he is not required for any further investigation. It further
seems that the applicant is not required for any further investigation. The
prosecution has also not raised any serious apprehension that if applicant
is admitted to bail then he is flight risk or he may tamper with the
evidence. In view of the above said discussion, period of custody, no
objection to bail given by the complainant and victim and without
commenting upon the merits of the case, no fruitful purpose would be
served by keeping the above said applicant in further custody. The
applicant/accused, Karan Singh Karki is thus admitted to bail on
furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- with one surety bond
of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of Ld. CJM/Ld.Trial
Court/Ld.Duty JMFC, subject to the following conditions:
a) The applicant/accused shall cooperate in the investigation and shall
join the investigation as and when required by IO/SHO concerned.
b) The applicant/accused shall not commit any similar offence or any
offence while on bail.
Bail Matter No. 324/2026
STATE Vs. Karan Singh Karki
FIR No. 48/2025
P. S : Cyber South West
U/s : 318(4)/319 BNS
Page No. 5 of 5
-- 4 of 5 --
c) The applicant/accused shall not make any inducement, threat or
promise to any witness or person acquainted with the facts of the
present case and shall not try to tamper with any evidence.
d) The applicant/accused shall not misuse the liberty of bail in any
manner and shall not flee from justice.
e) The applicant/accused shall not leave India without the prior
permission of the ld. Trial Court.
10. It is clarified that if the applicant/accused would violate any of the
above said condition of bail then the prosecution or the investigating
agency shall be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of bail of
the accused.
11. The observations as made in this order are only for the disposal of
the present bail application and these shall not be any reflection on the
merits of the case.
12. The present bail application is disposed of accordingly.
13.
Copy of this order be given dasti and be also sent to the concerned
Jail Superintendent for necessary information.
(Amit Bansal)
Roster Judge, ASJ-02
NDD/PHC/New Delhi
20.02.2026
Bail Matter No. 324/2026
STATE Vs. Karan Singh Karki
FIR No. 48/2025
P. S : Cyber South West
U/s : 318(4)/319 BNS
Page No. 5 of 5
-- 5 of 5 --