Final Order 2

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: FIR No. 15/2026
	PS Cyber South West Delhi
	State Vs. Abhishek Kumar
1/2
Bail Matters 307/2026
STATE OF DELHI Vs. ABHISHEK KUMAR
FIR No. 15/2026
PS CYBER NEW DELHI
U/sec 112(2)/61(2) BNS
26.02.2026
This is an application under section 482 BNSS for grant of anticipatory
bail moved on behalf of accused/applicant Abhishek Kumar.
Present: Sh. Gyan Prakash Ray, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Mr. S. A. Khan, ld. Counsel for accused/applicant.
IO HC Pintu Kumar is present.
Reply to the application filed. Copy supplied.
ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT
1. It is argued on behalf of applicant that he is a young man of
aged about 20 years and preparing for competitive examination. It is
further submitted that applicant is apprehending his arrest as police
officials are raided the house of applicant and calling on his mobile phone
again and again. It is further submitted that applicant and his family
members are harassing by police officials of Cyber Police Station (South
West) from last 15 days. It is further submitted that accused/applicant has
joined the investigation and he is ready to join the investigation as and
when required by the IO. Hence, it is prayed that anticipatory bail may be
granted to accused/applicant as he is ready to abide with any condition
imposed by the court.
-- 1 of 2 --
FIR No. 15/2026
	PS Cyber South West Delhi
	State Vs. Abhishek Kumar
2/2
ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF STATE
2. Per contra, Ld. (Substitute) Addl. PP for the State has
vehemently opposed the bail application.
2. It is submitted by IO that accused/applicant has joined the
investigation and he has been bound down after interrogation. It is further
submitted that custodial interrogation of accused/applicant is not required
in this case at this stage.
Submissions heard. Record perused. Statement of IO to this
effect is recorded separately.
FINDINGS/CONCLUSION
3. Keeping in view the fact that accused/applicant has joined
the investigation, he has been bound down by the IO and there is no
apprehension of his arrest as his custodial interrogation is not required by
IO at this stage, present application is dismissed being not maintainable.
3.1 Accused/applicant is directed to join the investigation as and
when required by IO. IO is also directed comply section 35 BNSS and
mandate of Hon’ble Supreme court passed in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of
Bihar Criminal Appeal No. 1277 of 2014 decided on 02.07.2014 and
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Misc.
Application No. 29164 of 2021 decided on 11.07.2022.
Copy of this order be given dasti as prayed for.
(Dhirendra Rana)
Bail Roster Judge/
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi/26.02.2026
-- 2 of 2 --