BANK OF INDIAVsSANDEEP KUMAR

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 83/24
BANK OF INDIA Vs. SANDEEP KUMAR
06.12.2024
Present: Sh. Kushagra Pandya, Proxy for Sh. Gaurav Dua,
Advocate for
Defendant is already
ex-parte, vide order dated
30.09.2024.
Heard. File perused.
Vide separate detailed judgment of even date,
announced in the open Court today, the suit of the plaintiff has
been decreed in favour of plaintiff and against defendant for an
amount of Rs. 7,26,373/- along with
pendente lite and future
interest @8% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its
realization along with costs.
Decree sheet be prepared accordingly.
File be consigned to record room, after due
compliance.
Vidya Prakash
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
06.12.2024(V)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12
CS (COMM.)/83/2024
CNR NO. : DLND010007072024
BANK OF INDIA
Vs.
SANDEEP KUMAR
22-02-2024
Present : Ms. Simran, Advocate alongwith Sh. Yash A.
Jodhani, Advocate for plaintiff.
Heard. File perused.
Counsel of plaintiff has pointed out that the deficient
Court Fee of Rs.1020/- alongwith Affidavit in terms of Order XI
Rule 6 (3) CPC applicable to The Commercial Courts Act, 2015
and proper list of documents, have already been filed on record.
Subject to all just exceptions, issue summons of suit
to defendant at all available addresses by all permissible modes
on taking requisite steps by the plaintiff, returnable for next date.
Steps be taken within 7 working days.
Written statement has to be filed by the defendant
within 30 days (extendable upto 120 days with the leave of the
court and that too subject to appropriate terms) from the date of
service of the process as per the Proviso of Sub Rule 1 of Order 5
Rule 1 CPC as applicable to The Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Put up on 24-05-2024 for further proceedings.
(VIDYA PRAKASH)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
22-02-2024(r)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 83/24
BANK OF INDIA Vs. SANDEEP KUMAR
29.01.2024
Fresh suit received by random allocation.
It be checked and registered.
Present: Ms. Nitika Malik, Advocate for Plaintiff.
Heard. Record perused.
Perusal of the record shows that appropriate affidavit
for electronic record documents in terms of Order XI Rule 6 (3)
CPC has not been filed by the plaintiff with the present suit.
Further, list of documents filed by the plaintiff is not in
accordance with Order XI Rule 1 (2) CPC as column of ‘Mode of
execution/issuance or receipt’ and ‘Line of custody’ are left
blank.
Further, Court fees deposited by plaintiff in respect
of the present suit is deficient as there is short of Rs. 1020/-.
Put up on 22.02.2024 for compliance/consideration.
VIDYA PRAKASH
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
29.01.2024 (v)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12
CS (COMM.)/83/2024
CNR NO. : DLND010007072024
BANK OF INDIA
Vs.
SANDEEP KUMAR
22-02-2024
Present : Ms. Simran, Advocate alongwith Sh. Yash A.
Jodhani, Advocate for plaintiff.
Heard. File perused.
Counsel of plaintiff has pointed out that the deficient
Court Fee of Rs.1020/- alongwith Affidavit in terms of Order XI
Rule 6 (3) CPC applicable to The Commercial Courts Act, 2015
and proper list of documents, have already been filed on record.
Subject to all just exceptions, issue summons of suit
to defendant at all available addresses by all permissible modes
on taking requisite steps by the plaintiff, returnable for next date.
Steps be taken within 7 working days.
Written statement has to be filed by the defendant
within 30 days (extendable upto 120 days with the leave of the
court and that too subject to appropriate terms) from the date of
service of the process as per the Proviso of Sub Rule 1 of Order 5
Rule 1 CPC as applicable to The Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Put up on 24-05-2024 for further proceedings.
(VIDYA PRAKASH)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
22-02-2024(r)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 83/24
BANK OF INDIA Vs. SANDEEP KUMAR
29.01.2024
Fresh suit received by random allocation.
It be checked and registered.
Present: Ms. Nitika Malik, Advocate for Plaintiff.
Heard. Record perused.
Perusal of the record shows that appropriate affidavit
for electronic record documents in terms of Order XI Rule 6 (3)
CPC has not been filed by the plaintiff with the present suit.
Further, list of documents filed by the plaintiff is not in
accordance with Order XI Rule 1 (2) CPC as column of ‘Mode of
execution/issuance or receipt’ and ‘Line of custody’ are left
blank.
Further, Court fees deposited by plaintiff in respect
of the present suit is deficient as there is short of Rs. 1020/-.
Put up on 22.02.2024 for compliance/consideration.
VIDYA PRAKASH
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
29.01.2024 (v)
-- 1 of 1 --