Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 4

CNR DLND01000586202429 Oct 2024
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 4 · 29 Oct 2024 · CNR DLND010005862024

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3
CS (COMM.)/70/2024
CNR NO. : DLND010005862024
BANK OF INDIA
Vs.
SATYENDRA PAL SINGH
29-10-2024
Present : Sh. Kushagra Pandya, Proxy Counsel for Sh. Gaurav
Dua, Advocate for plaintiff.
None for defendant, despite calls.
Heard. File perused.
Summons sent to the defendant at his all three
addresses through ordinary mode received back unserved with
report ‘
no such person.’
Summons, which were directed to be served upon the
defendant through e-mode, received back unserved with the report
that summons were sent to the defendant on the given e-mail id,
however, it bounced back. Further, Whatsapp is not available on
the given mobile number.
Ld. Proxy Counsel of plaintiff has filed an affidavit
of service alongwith relevant annexures, in terms of last order.
While referring to the aforesaid affidavit of service
and annexures filed therewith, Ld. Counsel of plaintiff has stated
that the defendant has been duly served with the summons of the
suit at his all three addresses through Speed Post on 04.10.2024,
however, summons sent to the defendant through Courier
remained unserved, as reflected in tracking reports downloaded
from the official websites of Indian Postal Department and
Trackon Couriers Pvt. Ltd. respectively.
CS (COMM.)/70/2024 Page 1 of 3
-- 1 of 3 --
Having considered the submissions made on behalf
of plaintiff and overall facts and circumstances of the case, the
Court is satisfied that the defendant is served with the summons of
suit through Speed Post on 04-10-2024 for 29-10-2024
i.e. today.
Despite such service, defendant has not filed written
statement till date from the said date of service.
Be awaited for appearance of defendant till 12:00
noon.
(VIDYA PRAKASH)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
2nd Call at 12:30 p.m.
Present : Proxy counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant, despite repeated calls.
Be awaited till 02:00 p.m.
(VIDYA PRAKASH)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
3rd Call at 02:15 p.m.
Present : Sh. Kushagra Pandya, Proxy Counsel for Sh. Gaurav
Dua, Advocate for plaintiff. (
Through v/c)
None for defendant, despite repeated calls since
morning.
Heard. File perused.
In the totality of the facts and circumstances of the
case and keeping in view the fact that none has appeared on behalf
of defendant despite wait and repeated calls since morning, the
defendant is hereby proceeded against as
ex parte.
Plaintiff is directed to file list of witnesses within
2 weeks from date of this order.
CS (COMM.)/70/2024 Page 2 of 3
-- 2 of 3 --
Put up on 14-01-2025 for
ex parte PE.
(VIDYA PRAKASH)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
29-10-2024(r)
CS (COMM.)/70/2024 Page 3 of 3
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.