RAILWAY ADMINISTRATIONVsM/S HIND TERMINALS PVT. LTD.

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 31 OMP (COMM.) 13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/s HIND TERMINALS
PVT. LTD.
16.03.2026 (At 12:10 PM)
Present: Sh. Sushil Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Anil Singh, CLA for petitioner.
Sh. Armaan Verma, Sh. Sarang Rastogi and Sh.
Ramapati Mishra, Ld. Counsels for respondent.
Fresh Vakalatnama filed on behalf of petitioner.
Arguments on merit of petition is to be heard. Both
parties shall file brief note of their submission along with any relied
upon case laws with advance copy given to each other.
Put up on 20.07.2026.
(Pulastya Pramachala)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/16.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 30 OMP (COMM.) 13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/S HIND TERMINALS
PVT. LTD.
26.08.2025 (At 11:53AM)
Present : None.
Vide separate order announced in the open court, the
application filed by petitioner thereby seeking condonation of
delay, is allowed.
Respondent is given opportunity to file reply to the
main objection before next date of hearing after supplying
advance copy of the same to the opposite counsel.
Put up on 05.12.2025 for arguments.
Pulastya Pramachala
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
26.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 24 OMP (COMM.) 13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/S HIND TERMINALS
PVT. LTD.
18.07.2025 (AT 12:12PM)
Present : Sh. Kuldeep Singh, Proxy Counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Armaan Verma and Sh Sarang Rastogi, Ld.
Counsels for the respondent.
Adjournment sought as the main counsel for
petitioner is busy in Hon’ble Delhi High Court. On last date of
hearing also he had not appeared before the Court. Last and final
opportunity is given for final arguments and case is adjourned for
today subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid by the petitioner to
the respondent.
Put up this matter for arguments on 19.08.2025.
Pulastya Pramachala
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
18.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/S HIND TERMINALS PVT.
LTD.
01.05.2025
Present:- Sh. Shubham Chakravorty, Ld. Proxy counsel for the
petitioner.
Sh. Sarang Rastogi and Sh. Romit Jain, Ld. Counsels fo the
respondent.
Today the matter is listed for arguments on the query so
raised by the court and for further arguments on the pending
application.
Ld. Proxy counsel for the petitioner submits that the main
counsel is indisposed and seeks adjournment in this regard. He further
submits that they have already informed the Ld. Counsel for the
respondent in this regard which the Ld. Counsel for the respondent
admits.
On request, put up this matter for arguments on the query so
raised by the court and for further arguments on the pending
application, on 18.07.2025 at 12:00 PM.
(Anurag Sain)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/01.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/S HIND TERMINALS PVT.
LTD.
04.03.2025
Present:- Sh. Vijay Joshi, Sh. Balendu Shekhar, Sh. Kuldeep Singh
and Sh. Hemant Goyal, Ld. Counsels for the petitioner.
Sh. Piyush Sharma, Sh. Sarang Rastogi and Sh. Armaan
Verma, Ld. Counsels for the respondent.
Part arguments heard.
Ld. Counsels for the parties submit that they have already
filed written arguments before this court in support of their contentions.
The court is having time bound matter to hear arguments
and therefore, no time left for hearing further arguments in the present
case.
Put up this matter for further arguments on the query so
raised by the court and for further arguments on the pending
application, on 01.05.2025 at 12:00 Noon. As prayed, both the parties
are at liberty to file additional written submissions, if any, before the
court in support of their contentions with advance copy of the same to
each other one week prior to the next date of hearing.
(Anurag Sain)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/04.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/S HIND TERMINALS PVT.
LTD.
18.11.2024
Present:- Sh. Vijay Joshi, Indu Shekhar and Sh. Kuldeep Singh, Ld.
Counsels for the petitioner.
Sh. Piyush Sharma, Sh. Armaan Verma and Sh. Sarang
Rastogi, Ld. Counsels for the respondent.
Arguments heard on the application seeking condonation of
delay.
Put up for clarifications, if any/order, on 07.01.2025 at 12:00
Noon. Both the parties are at liberty to file written submissions in
support of their contentions five days prior to the next date of hearing
with advance copy of the same to each other.
(Anurag Sain)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/18.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.)13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/S HIND TERMINALS
PVT.LTD.
09.08.2024
Present:- Sh. Vijay Joshi and Sh. Indu Shekhar, Ld. Counsels for the
petitioner.
Sh. Piyush Sharma, Sh. Rahul Khosla, Sh. Pankaj Prakash,
Sh. Sarang Rastogi, Sh. Armaan Verma and Sh. Prasanna
Kumar, Ld. Counsels for the respondent.
Part arguments on the application seeking condonation of
delay heard.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he needs
sometime to further argue the matter on the application seeking
condonation of delay.
On request, put up this matter for further arguments and if
concluded, for order, on 18.11.2024 at 11:30 AM.
(Anurag Sain)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/09.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.)13/24
Railway Administration Vs. M/S Hind Terminals Pvt.Ltd.
03.06.2024
Present : Sh. Vijay Joshi, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Armaan Verma, Proxy Counsel for the
respondent.
Proxy counsel for the respondent has filed reply to
the application under Section 34 (3) of Arbitration and
Conciliation Act seeking condonation of delay filed by the
petitioner, vakalatnama and Board Resolution. The same are
taken on record. Copy of reply has already been supplied to the
counsel for the petitioner.
The counsel for the respondent seeks passover.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has other matters and
he has to go.
Arbitral record has already been received.
On request, put up this matter for arguments on
09.08.2024.
Anurag Sain
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
03.06.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Railway Administration vs. Hind Terminals Pvt. Ltd.
OMP (COMM) 13/2024
19.01.2024
Fresh petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and
conciliation Act received by way of random allocation.
It be checked and registered.
Present : Sh.Vijay Joshi and Indu Shekhar, Ld. Counsel for
the petitioner.
The Court raised query from the petitioner with
respect to the maintainability of the present petition. Counsel for
the petitioner seeks some time to satisfy the query so raised by
the Court.
On request, put up this matter for further
proceedings on 12.03.2024.
Anurag Sain
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
19.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Railway Administration vs. Hind Terminals Pvt. Ltd.
OMP (COMM) 13/2024
19.01.2024
Fresh petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and
conciliation Act received by way of random allocation.
It be checked and registered.
Present : Sh.Vijay Joshi and Indu Shekhar, Ld. Counsel for
the petitioner.
The Court raised query from the petitioner with
respect to the maintainability of the present petition. Counsel for
the petitioner seeks some time to satisfy the query so raised by
the Court.
On request, put up this matter for further
proceedings on 12.03.2024.
Anurag Sain
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
19.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 21 OMP (COMM.) 13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/S HIND TERMINALS
PVT. LTD.
20.07.2026 (At 12:23PM)
Present : Sh. Aman Pandey, Proxy counsel for the petitioner
through video conferencing.
Sh. Armaan Verma and Sh. Sarang Rastogi, Ld.
Counsels for the respondent.
Proxy counsel for petitioner submits that main
counsel for petitioner is not well. One written submission has been
filed on behalf of respondent, but no written submission filed on
behalf of petitioner. Further opportunity sought for that purpose.
This would be last opportunity to file any written
submissions and to make oral submissions in brief.
Put up on 23.11.2026.
Pulastya Pramachala
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
20.07.2026(HL)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 31 OMP (COMM.) 13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/s HIND TERMINALS
PVT. LTD.
16.03.2026 (At 12:10 PM)
Present: Sh. Sushil Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Anil Singh, CLA for petitioner.
Sh. Armaan Verma, Sh. Sarang Rastogi and Sh.
Ramapati Mishra, Ld. Counsels for respondent.
Fresh Vakalatnama filed on behalf of petitioner.
Arguments on merit of petition is to be heard. Both
parties shall file brief note of their submission along with any relied
upon case laws with advance copy given to each other.
Put up on 20.07.2026.
(Pulastya Pramachala)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/16.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 30 OMP (COMM.) 13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/S HIND TERMINALS
PVT. LTD.
26.08.2025 (At 11:53AM)
Present : None.
Vide separate order announced in the open court, the
application filed by petitioner thereby seeking condonation of
delay, is allowed.
Respondent is given opportunity to file reply to the
main objection before next date of hearing after supplying
advance copy of the same to the opposite counsel.
Put up on 05.12.2025 for arguments.
Pulastya Pramachala
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
26.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 24 OMP (COMM.) 13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/S HIND TERMINALS
PVT. LTD.
18.07.2025 (AT 12:12PM)
Present : Sh. Kuldeep Singh, Proxy Counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Armaan Verma and Sh Sarang Rastogi, Ld.
Counsels for the respondent.
Adjournment sought as the main counsel for
petitioner is busy in Hon’ble Delhi High Court. On last date of
hearing also he had not appeared before the Court. Last and final
opportunity is given for final arguments and case is adjourned for
today subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid by the petitioner to
the respondent.
Put up this matter for arguments on 19.08.2025.
Pulastya Pramachala
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
18.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/S HIND TERMINALS PVT.
LTD.
01.05.2025
Present:- Sh. Shubham Chakravorty, Ld. Proxy counsel for the
petitioner.
Sh. Sarang Rastogi and Sh. Romit Jain, Ld. Counsels fo the
respondent.
Today the matter is listed for arguments on the query so
raised by the court and for further arguments on the pending
application.
Ld. Proxy counsel for the petitioner submits that the main
counsel is indisposed and seeks adjournment in this regard. He further
submits that they have already informed the Ld. Counsel for the
respondent in this regard which the Ld. Counsel for the respondent
admits.
On request, put up this matter for arguments on the query so
raised by the court and for further arguments on the pending
application, on 18.07.2025 at 12:00 PM.
(Anurag Sain)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/01.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/S HIND TERMINALS PVT.
LTD.
04.03.2025
Present:- Sh. Vijay Joshi, Sh. Balendu Shekhar, Sh. Kuldeep Singh
and Sh. Hemant Goyal, Ld. Counsels for the petitioner.
Sh. Piyush Sharma, Sh. Sarang Rastogi and Sh. Armaan
Verma, Ld. Counsels for the respondent.
Part arguments heard.
Ld. Counsels for the parties submit that they have already
filed written arguments before this court in support of their contentions.
The court is having time bound matter to hear arguments
and therefore, no time left for hearing further arguments in the present
case.
Put up this matter for further arguments on the query so
raised by the court and for further arguments on the pending
application, on 01.05.2025 at 12:00 Noon. As prayed, both the parties
are at liberty to file additional written submissions, if any, before the
court in support of their contentions with advance copy of the same to
each other one week prior to the next date of hearing.
(Anurag Sain)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/04.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.) 13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/S HIND TERMINALS PVT.
LTD.
18.11.2024
Present:- Sh. Vijay Joshi, Indu Shekhar and Sh. Kuldeep Singh, Ld.
Counsels for the petitioner.
Sh. Piyush Sharma, Sh. Armaan Verma and Sh. Sarang
Rastogi, Ld. Counsels for the respondent.
Arguments heard on the application seeking condonation of
delay.
Put up for clarifications, if any/order, on 07.01.2025 at 12:00
Noon. Both the parties are at liberty to file written submissions in
support of their contentions five days prior to the next date of hearing
with advance copy of the same to each other.
(Anurag Sain)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/18.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.)13/24
RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/S HIND TERMINALS
PVT.LTD.
09.08.2024
Present:- Sh. Vijay Joshi and Sh. Indu Shekhar, Ld. Counsels for the
petitioner.
Sh. Piyush Sharma, Sh. Rahul Khosla, Sh. Pankaj Prakash,
Sh. Sarang Rastogi, Sh. Armaan Verma and Sh. Prasanna
Kumar, Ld. Counsels for the respondent.
Part arguments on the application seeking condonation of
delay heard.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he needs
sometime to further argue the matter on the application seeking
condonation of delay.
On request, put up this matter for further arguments and if
concluded, for order, on 18.11.2024 at 11:30 AM.
(Anurag Sain)
District Judge (Commercial Court-01),
Patiala House Courts Complex,
New Delhi/09.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: OMP (COMM.)13/24
Railway Administration Vs. M/S Hind Terminals Pvt.Ltd.
03.06.2024
Present : Sh. Vijay Joshi, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Armaan Verma, Proxy Counsel for the
respondent.
Proxy counsel for the respondent has filed reply to
the application under Section 34 (3) of Arbitration and
Conciliation Act seeking condonation of delay filed by the
petitioner, vakalatnama and Board Resolution. The same are
taken on record. Copy of reply has already been supplied to the
counsel for the petitioner.
The counsel for the respondent seeks passover.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has other matters and
he has to go.
Arbitral record has already been received.
On request, put up this matter for arguments on
09.08.2024.
Anurag Sain
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
03.06.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Railway Administration vs. Hind Terminals Pvt. Ltd.
OMP (COMM) 13/2024
19.01.2024
Fresh petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and
conciliation Act received by way of random allocation.
It be checked and registered.
Present : Sh.Vijay Joshi and Indu Shekhar, Ld. Counsel for
the petitioner.
The Court raised query from the petitioner with
respect to the maintainability of the present petition. Counsel for
the petitioner seeks some time to satisfy the query so raised by
the Court.
On request, put up this matter for further
proceedings on 12.03.2024.
Anurag Sain
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
19.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Railway Administration vs. Hind Terminals Pvt. Ltd.
OMP (COMM) 13/2024
19.01.2024
Fresh petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and
conciliation Act received by way of random allocation.
It be checked and registered.
Present : Sh.Vijay Joshi and Indu Shekhar, Ld. Counsel for
the petitioner.
The Court raised query from the petitioner with
respect to the maintainability of the present petition. Counsel for
the petitioner seeks some time to satisfy the query so raised by
the Court.
On request, put up this matter for further
proceedings on 12.03.2024.
Anurag Sain
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
19.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --