Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 3

CNR DLND01000481202528 May 2025
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 3 · 28 May 2025 · CNR DLND010004812025

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.)/69/2025 Page 1 of 3
10
CS (COMM.)/69/2025
CNR NO. : DLND010004812025
ROCHADS MEDIA PVT LTD
VS.
ITD TECHNOLOGIES AND MARKETING PVT LTD
28-05-2025
Present : Sh. Shubham Kumar, Advocate for plaintiff.
None for defendant company, despite calls.
Heard. File perused.
Ld. Counsel of plaintiff has filed affidavit of service
alongwith certain annexures.
While pointing out from the record and said affidavit
of service, Ld. Counsel of plaintiff has submitted that the
defendant company was duly served with summons of the suit by
way of e-mail
i.e. itdtchnologiespvtltd@gmail.com, which is
stated to be official e-mail id of the defendant company as reflected
in Master Data of the defendant company available on the official
website of Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Govt. of India, on 28-04-
2025 for 29-04-2025.
Ld. Counsel has further submitted that the defendant
was also served on the said e-mail id, by the Nazarat Branch, on
21-04-2025, which is duly reflected in the proceedings dated
29-04-2025.
Having regard to the aforesaid submission made on
behalf of plaintiff, which is duly supported by affidavit of service
and documents filed therewith, the Court is satisfied that the
defendant was duly served with the summons of the suit through
e-mode on the official e-mail id as available in the Master Data of
the defendant company, firstly on 21-04-2025 and subsequently on
-- 1 of 3 --
CS (COMM.)/69/2025 Page 2 of 3
28-04-2025. In these facts and circumstances, the limitation period
for filing written statement by the defendant company shall
commence from 21-04-2025, when the defendant was firstly
served with summons of the suit.
Despite such service, written statement has not been
filed by the defendant either within statutory period of 30 days
from said first date of service or even till date. Moreover, none
appeared on behalf of defendant, despite calls, today.
Be awaited for appearance of defendant till 12:00
noon.
(VIDYA PRAKASH)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
2nd Call at 12:10 p.m.
Present : Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant, despite repeated calls.
Be awaited till 02:00 p.m.
(VIDYA PRAKASH)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
3rd Call at 02:12 p.m.
Present : Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant, despite repeated calls since
morning.
Heard. File perused.
In the totality of the facts and circumstances of the
case and keeping in view the fact that none has appeared on behalf
of defendant despite wait and repeated calls since morning,
-- 2 of 3 --
CS (COMM.)/69/2025 Page 3 of 3
the defendant is hereby proceeded against as
ex parte.
Plaintiff is directed to file list of witnesses within 2
weeks from date of this order.
Put up on 29-08-2025 for
ex parte PE.
(VIDYA PRAKASH)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-02
Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
28-05-2025(r)
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.