Skip to main content
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ

RAVI SHANKAR DABAS +1 moreVsGRANDLAY ELECTRICALS INDIAN +1 more

CNR DLND01000154202513-District Judge-03
Patiala House Court - District sessions Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 10 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
19/2025
Registration Date
14 Jan 2025
Next Hearing Date
27 Nov 2026
Case Stage
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    4

    Petitioner

    1. 1RAVI SHANKAR DABAS
    2. 2PARIKSHA DABAS

    Respondent

    1. 1GRANDLAY ELECTRICALS INDIAN
    2. 2PRADEEP BATRA

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Possession and Recovery of Rent/Damages/Mesne profit · Sec 80

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 14-01-2025
Business: Summons
Next Purpose: Misc. cases
Next Hearing Date: 17-02-2025

Date: 17-02-2025
Business: Application disposed of
Next Purpose: Issues
Next Hearing Date: 13-05-2025

Date: 13-05-2025
Business: Adjourned
Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 29-10-2025

Date: 29-10-2025
Business: Application disposed of
Next Purpose: Issues
Next Hearing Date: 12-11-2025

Date: 12-11-2025
Business: Adjourned
Next Purpose: Issues
Next Hearing Date: 19-12-2025

Date: 19-12-2025
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 05-01-2026

Date: 05-01-2026
Business: Argument heard
Next Purpose: Order
Next Hearing Date: 19-01-2026

Date: 19-01-2026
Business: application allowed
Next Purpose: Misc. cases
Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2026

Date: 17-04-2026
Business: Issues framed
Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Next Hearing Date: 07-08-2026

Date: 07-08-2026
Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Next Hearing Date: 27-11-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 97/2025
Filing Date: 09-01-2025
eFiling Number: ADL20230014270C202500001
eFiling Date: 09-01-2025
First Hearing Date: 14th January 2025
Court Number And Judge: 13-District Judge-03

    Orders

    22
    Interim Order 11
    17 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 19/25
RAVI SHANKAR DABAS Vs. GRANDLAY
ELECTRICALS INDIAN
17.04.2026
Present: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ms. Shivani, Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC.
Pleadings are stated to be complete. On basis of
pleadings of parties, following issues are framed:
ISSUES:
1 Whether plaintiff is entitled to mesne profit/damages for
unauthorized use and occupation of suit property? If yes, at what
rate and for which period? OPP
2 Whether plaintiff is entitled to interest over the mesne
profit/damages for unauthorized use and occupation of suit
property? If yes, at what rate and for which period? OPP
3 Relief.
No other issue arises nor is pressed.
To come up for PE on 07.08.2026. Plaintiff to file
evidence affidavit on or before next date of hearing with advance
copy to defendant at least 15 days before next date of hearing.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
17.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 10Full order available
    19 Jan 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDGMENT Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF Ms. MEENU KAUSHIK DISTRICT JUDGE – 03, NEW DELHI DISTRICT PATIALA HOUSE COURT CS No.19/2025 Shri Ravi Shankar Dabas & Anr. …Plaintiffs Versus Grandlay Electricals Indian & Anr. ...Defendants ORDER 1. This order shall decide whether decree for recovery of possession of suit property on admissions made by defendants can be passed in favour of the plaintiff under Order 12 Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure. Plaint: 2.…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 9
    19 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 19/25
Ravi Shankar Dabas Vs. Grandlay Electricals Indian
19.01.2026
At 4 pm
Present: None.
Vide separate order announced in the open court, the
present suit is liable to be decreed for the relief of possession in
view of the admissions made by defendant no. 2 by exercising
jurisdiction under Order 12 Rule 6 of CPC.
The defendants are hereby directed to handover
vacant possession of the property bearing No. B-1/17, Vasant
Vihar, 1st Floor with half terrace rights alongwith one car parking
in driveway and one servant quarter with common WC on terrace
measuring 600 Sq. Yards to the plaintiff.
Accordingly, application u/O 12 Rule 6 of CPC
moved on behalf of plaintiff is disposed of as allowed.
Decree sheet be prepared accordingly.
Put up for further proceedings on 17.04.2026.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
19.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 8Full order available
    05 Jan 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: -1- CS No. 19/25 RAVI SHANKAR DABAS Vs. GRANDLAY ELECTRICALS INDIAN 05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiffs along with plaintiff no. 2 in person. Mr. Rajeev Bajaj and Mr. Arsh Rampal, Ld. Counsels for defendants. Reply to application u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC along with application for condonation of delay is filed on behalf of defendant. Arguments on application for condonation of delay in filing reply on behalf of…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 7
    19 Dec 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 19/25
Ravi Shankar Dabas Vs. Grandlay Electricals Indian
19.12.2025
Present: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
through VC.
Mr. Yash Dadriwal, Ld. Proxy Counsel for
defendant.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant requests for an
adjournment on the ground that since main counsel is suffering
from fever.
Reply to the application u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC could
not be filed.
Adjournment is highly opposed by the plaintiff.
Record reveals that on the last date of hearing in the
present case was 12.11.2025 and since then no reply is filed, the
reason given for not filing the reply is not found satisfactory.
Opportunity of the defendant to give reply to the application
stands closed.
Put up for arguments on application u/O 12 Rule 6
CPC on 05.01.2026.
It is made clear that in case no one shall appear on
behalf of defendant to address the arguments on the application,
application shall be decided without hearing the defendant and on
the basis of material available on record.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
19.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 6
    12 Nov 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 19/25
RAVI SHANKAR DABAS Vs. GRANDLAY ELECTRICALS
INDIAN
12.11.2025
Present: Sh. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through VC.
Sh. Rajiv Bajaj, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
through VC.
Replication as well as application u/O 12 Rule 6
CPC filed on behalf of plaintiff. It is submitted by ld. Counsel for
defendant that he has received copy of the application u/O 12
Rule 6 CPC. Time sought for filing the reply to the application.
Now to come up for filing of reply to application
u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC on 19.12.2025.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
12.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 5Full order available
    29 Oct 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS 19/2025 Ravi Shankar Dabas Vs. Grandlay Electricals 29.10.2025 At 4.00 PM Present: None By way of this order I shall dispose of the application moved on behalf of defendant u/O 8 Rule 1 r/w section 151 CPC seeking condonation of delay in filing the written statement on behalf of defendant and the application u/O 8 Rule10 CPC moved on behalf of plaintiff. Arguments on the application already heard. It is submitted…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 4
    29 Oct 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 19/25
Ravi Shankar Dabas Vs. Grandlay Electricals Indian
29.10.2025
Present: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Mr. Rajeev Bajaj, Ld. Counsel for defendant through
VC.
Record reveals that one application under Order 8
Rule 10 moved on behalf of plaintiff and the other application
under Order 8 Rule 1 moved on behalf of defendant are pending
disposal.
Arguments on the applications heard.
During the course of arguments, it is submitted by
Ld. Counsel for the defendant that relevant medical documents
shall be supplied by him by 3 pm today.
Considering the submissions, put up for orders at 4
pm.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
29.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    13 May 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 19/25
Ravi Shankar Dabas vs. Grandlay Electricals Indian
13.05.2025
Present: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs.
Ms. Shivangi Nanda, Ld. Counsel for the
defendants.
Application under Order 8 Rule 10 read with Section
151 of CPC is filed by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs. Copy is
supplied.
Written statement, application under Order 8 Rule 1
read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act, affidavit for admission
and denial of documents and documents are filed by Ld. Counsel
for the defendants. Copies have already been supplied.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs submits that copies
were supplied only last night and he needs time to go through the
same.
To come up for arguments on the above applications
on 29.10.2025.
(Shirish Aggarwal)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
13.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2Full order available
    17 Feb 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No. 19/25 Ravi Shankar Dabas Vs. Grandlay Electricals Indian 17.02.2025 Present : Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs through VC. Ms. Shivangi Nanda, Ld. Counsel for the defendants. Memorandum of appearance is filed by Ld. Counsel for the defendants. She submits that the matter is pending before the Mediation Centre of the Hon’ble High Court for exploring the possibility of settlement. She submits that the matter will be taken…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 1Full order available
    14 Jan 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No. 19/25 Ravi Shankar Dabas & Anr. vs. Grandlay Electricals Indian & Anr. 14.01.2025 Fresh suit is received. It be checked and registered. Present : Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs. Arguments are heard and the record is perused. Issue summons of the suit for settlement of issues as well as notice of the accompanying application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for service upon defendants…

    Read Full Order
    Order 11
    17 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 19/25
RAVI SHANKAR DABAS Vs. GRANDLAY
ELECTRICALS INDIAN
17.04.2026
Present: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ms. Shivani, Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC.
Pleadings are stated to be complete. On basis of
pleadings of parties, following issues are framed:
ISSUES:
1 Whether plaintiff is entitled to mesne profit/damages for
unauthorized use and occupation of suit property? If yes, at what
rate and for which period? OPP
2 Whether plaintiff is entitled to interest over the mesne
profit/damages for unauthorized use and occupation of suit
property? If yes, at what rate and for which period? OPP
3 Relief.
No other issue arises nor is pressed.
To come up for PE on 07.08.2026. Plaintiff to file
evidence affidavit on or before next date of hearing with advance
copy to defendant at least 15 days before next date of hearing.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
17.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 10Full order available
    19 Jan 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDGMENT Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF Ms. MEENU KAUSHIK DISTRICT JUDGE – 03, NEW DELHI DISTRICT PATIALA HOUSE COURT CS No.19/2025 Shri Ravi Shankar Dabas & Anr. …Plaintiffs Versus Grandlay Electricals Indian & Anr. ...Defendants ORDER 1. This order shall decide whether decree for recovery of possession of suit property on admissions made by defendants can be passed in favour of the plaintiff under Order 12 Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure. Plaint: 2.…

    Read Full Order
    Order 9
    19 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 19/25
Ravi Shankar Dabas Vs. Grandlay Electricals Indian
19.01.2026
At 4 pm
Present: None.
Vide separate order announced in the open court, the
present suit is liable to be decreed for the relief of possession in
view of the admissions made by defendant no. 2 by exercising
jurisdiction under Order 12 Rule 6 of CPC.
The defendants are hereby directed to handover
vacant possession of the property bearing No. B-1/17, Vasant
Vihar, 1st Floor with half terrace rights alongwith one car parking
in driveway and one servant quarter with common WC on terrace
measuring 600 Sq. Yards to the plaintiff.
Accordingly, application u/O 12 Rule 6 of CPC
moved on behalf of plaintiff is disposed of as allowed.
Decree sheet be prepared accordingly.
Put up for further proceedings on 17.04.2026.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
19.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 8Full order available
    05 Jan 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: -1- CS No. 19/25 RAVI SHANKAR DABAS Vs. GRANDLAY ELECTRICALS INDIAN 05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiffs along with plaintiff no. 2 in person. Mr. Rajeev Bajaj and Mr. Arsh Rampal, Ld. Counsels for defendants. Reply to application u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC along with application for condonation of delay is filed on behalf of defendant. Arguments on application for condonation of delay in filing reply on behalf of…

    Read Full Order
    Order 7
    19 Dec 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 19/25
Ravi Shankar Dabas Vs. Grandlay Electricals Indian
19.12.2025
Present: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
through VC.
Mr. Yash Dadriwal, Ld. Proxy Counsel for
defendant.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant requests for an
adjournment on the ground that since main counsel is suffering
from fever.
Reply to the application u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC could
not be filed.
Adjournment is highly opposed by the plaintiff.
Record reveals that on the last date of hearing in the
present case was 12.11.2025 and since then no reply is filed, the
reason given for not filing the reply is not found satisfactory.
Opportunity of the defendant to give reply to the application
stands closed.
Put up for arguments on application u/O 12 Rule 6
CPC on 05.01.2026.
It is made clear that in case no one shall appear on
behalf of defendant to address the arguments on the application,
application shall be decided without hearing the defendant and on
the basis of material available on record.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
19.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 6
    12 Nov 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 19/25
RAVI SHANKAR DABAS Vs. GRANDLAY ELECTRICALS
INDIAN
12.11.2025
Present: Sh. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through VC.
Sh. Rajiv Bajaj, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
through VC.
Replication as well as application u/O 12 Rule 6
CPC filed on behalf of plaintiff. It is submitted by ld. Counsel for
defendant that he has received copy of the application u/O 12
Rule 6 CPC. Time sought for filing the reply to the application.
Now to come up for filing of reply to application
u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC on 19.12.2025.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
12.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 5Full order available
    29 Oct 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS 19/2025 Ravi Shankar Dabas Vs. Grandlay Electricals 29.10.2025 At 4.00 PM Present: None By way of this order I shall dispose of the application moved on behalf of defendant u/O 8 Rule 1 r/w section 151 CPC seeking condonation of delay in filing the written statement on behalf of defendant and the application u/O 8 Rule10 CPC moved on behalf of plaintiff. Arguments on the application already heard. It is submitted…

    Read Full Order
    Order 4
    29 Oct 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 19/25
Ravi Shankar Dabas Vs. Grandlay Electricals Indian
29.10.2025
Present: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Mr. Rajeev Bajaj, Ld. Counsel for defendant through
VC.
Record reveals that one application under Order 8
Rule 10 moved on behalf of plaintiff and the other application
under Order 8 Rule 1 moved on behalf of defendant are pending
disposal.
Arguments on the applications heard.
During the course of arguments, it is submitted by
Ld. Counsel for the defendant that relevant medical documents
shall be supplied by him by 3 pm today.
Considering the submissions, put up for orders at 4
pm.
(Meenu Kaushik)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
29.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    13 May 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 19/25
Ravi Shankar Dabas vs. Grandlay Electricals Indian
13.05.2025
Present: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs.
Ms. Shivangi Nanda, Ld. Counsel for the
defendants.
Application under Order 8 Rule 10 read with Section
151 of CPC is filed by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs. Copy is
supplied.
Written statement, application under Order 8 Rule 1
read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act, affidavit for admission
and denial of documents and documents are filed by Ld. Counsel
for the defendants. Copies have already been supplied.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs submits that copies
were supplied only last night and he needs time to go through the
same.
To come up for arguments on the above applications
on 29.10.2025.
(Shirish Aggarwal)
District Judge-03
Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
13.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2Full order available
    17 Feb 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No. 19/25 Ravi Shankar Dabas Vs. Grandlay Electricals Indian 17.02.2025 Present : Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs through VC. Ms. Shivangi Nanda, Ld. Counsel for the defendants. Memorandum of appearance is filed by Ld. Counsel for the defendants. She submits that the matter is pending before the Mediation Centre of the Hon’ble High Court for exploring the possibility of settlement. She submits that the matter will be taken…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1Full order available
    14 Jan 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No. 19/25 Ravi Shankar Dabas & Anr. vs. Grandlay Electricals Indian & Anr. 14.01.2025 Fresh suit is received. It be checked and registered. Present : Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs. Arguments are heard and the record is perused. Issue summons of the suit for settlement of issues as well as notice of the accompanying application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for service upon defendants…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.