JAGDISH KUMAR PAWARVsRAHUL NAGLE

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9 Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
CNR No.DLET030012622024
13.08.2026
Present: Sh. Raju, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith
plaintiff.
Sh. Aaditya, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through
V/C.
Replication has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
Taken on record. Copy supplied.
It is submitted on behalf of the parties that there is
no document for admission and denial.
On the basis of pleadings of the parties, following
issues are framed for adjudication:-
Issue No.1:Whether the plaintiff is entitled for a
decree of recovery in the sum of Rs.2,30,000/-
alongwith interest? OPP.
Issue No.2:Relief?
No other issue arises or is pressed for.
Both the parties are directed to file their respective
list of witnesses in terms of order XVI rule 1 CPC within 15
days from the date of order. The plaintiff is directed to file
affidavits of all the PWs before the next date of hearing with
advance copy to the defendant(s) at least one week before the
next date of hearing.
List for PE on 01.10.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
13.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 3 Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
30.05.2026
Present: Sh. Raju, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith
plaintiff.
Sh. Aditya, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through
alongwith defendant.
Rectified WS alongwith necessary affidavit has been
filed by the defendant. Taken on record. Copy supplied.
The plaintiff is directed to file replication, if any,
with advance copy to the opposite party before the NDOH.
Be put up for completion of pleadings, admission-
denial/ framing of issues on 13.08.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
30.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8 Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
23.12.2025
Present: Sh. Raju, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Aditiya, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through
V/C alongwith defendant.
Previous cost of Rs.2,000/- paid by the defendant to
the plaintiff.
Replication / rejoinder has been filed on behalf of
the plaintiff. Taken on record. Copy supplied.
Further, it is submitted by the ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff that the affidavit filed alongwith the WS is not that of
the defendant but of his ld. Counsel which is not legally
permissible.
Upon perusal of the court file, it is seen that the hard
copy of the WS has not been filed at all. Ld. Counsel for the
defendant submits that he would verify and apprise this court
regarding the hard copy of the WS as well as the confusion
regarding the affidavit filed alongwith the WS positively on the
NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 02.03.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
23.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 17 Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
23.09.2025
Present: Sh. Raju, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith
plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
No WS has been filed by the defendant within the
prescribed period. The defendant submits that he was under the
impression that the WS has already been e-filed by his counsel
and he is surprised to know that the same has not been done.
Considering the submission and the fact that the
litigant ought not be penalised for the fault of his counsel, the
defendant is given one final opportunity to file the WS. However,
a cost of Rs.2,000/- is imposed upon the defendant to be paid the
plaintiff on the NDOH for the delay and inconvenience caused.
Be put up for filing of WS / further proceedings on
23.12.2025.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
23.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
13.05.2025
Present: Plaintiff in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Mr. Raju.
Defendant in person.
Mr. Aditya, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through
VC.
Ex parte evidence already filed. Taken on record.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant states that some time
may be granted to file appropriate application seeking recall of
ex parte proceedings. Opposed.
It is seen that the defendant was served as far back
as in November 2024. Considerable delay has already been
caused. Considering the same, adjournment sought is allowed
subject to a cost of Rs. 1,000/- to be paid to the plaintiff on
NDOH. It is made clear that if for any reason whatsoever proper
application is not filed with an advance copy to the plaintiff by
NDOH, no such accommodation shall be made.
Re-list on 21.07.2025.
(Gaurav Sharma)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
13.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
04.03.2025
Present: Plaintiff in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Mr. Raju.
On perusal of the case file, it is observed that
summons issued to the defendant were returned back executed /
served on 18.11.2024. Ld. Counsel has also filed tracking report
alongwith affidavit as per which the defendant was served on
16.11.2024 at the residential address. Taken on record.
No WS filed till date. Statutory period of filing WS
has already expired. Therefore, defence of defendant is struck
off.
None has appeared for defendant since date of
service. Hence, he is proceeded ex-parte.
Put up for ex-parte PE on 13.05.2025.
(Gaurav Sharma)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
04.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
30.11.2024
Ld. P.O. is on leave today.
Present: Sh. Raju and Sh. M.K. Singh, Ld. Counsels for plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Put up for further proceedings on 04.03.2025.
Ahlmad in the court of
ASCJ/JSCC/Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/30.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
16.10.2024
Fresh suit received by way of assignment through e-filing. It be checked and
registered.
Present : Sh. Raju and Sh. M. K. Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff.
Present suit has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff for recovery
of Rs. 2,30,000/- against the defendant.
Submission heard on the maintainability of the present suit.
Present suit seems to have been filed within the period of
limitation as well as jurisdiction of this Court.
Issue summons to the defendant at the given address on filing of
PF, RC, Speed Post along with copy of plaint and documents within 7 days
from today, returnable for the NDOH.
Now, put up for report on summons / further proceedings on
30.11.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/16.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 18 Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
CNR No.DLET030012622024
01.10.2026
Present: Sh. Raju, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith
plaintiff.
Sh. Aaditya, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
alongwith defendant.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that only one
plaintiff witness i.e. the plaintiff is required to be examined.
Evidence by way of affidavit of PW1/ plaintiff has
been filed. Taken on record. Copy supplied.
PW1 Sh. Jagdish Kumar Panwar has been
examined-in-chief, cross-examined and discharged.
Vide separate statement of the plaintiff, PE stands
closed.
Defendant is directed to file the list of witnesses and
the evidence by way of affidavit of the defence witnesses with
advance copy to the plaintiff at least a week prior to the NDOH.
Be put up for DE on 10.12.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
01.10.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9 Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
CNR No.DLET030012622024
13.08.2026
Present: Sh. Raju, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith
plaintiff.
Sh. Aaditya, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through
V/C.
Replication has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
Taken on record. Copy supplied.
It is submitted on behalf of the parties that there is
no document for admission and denial.
On the basis of pleadings of the parties, following
issues are framed for adjudication:-
Issue No.1:Whether the plaintiff is entitled for a
decree of recovery in the sum of Rs.2,30,000/-
alongwith interest? OPP.
Issue No.2:Relief?
No other issue arises or is pressed for.
Both the parties are directed to file their respective
list of witnesses in terms of order XVI rule 1 CPC within 15
days from the date of order. The plaintiff is directed to file
affidavits of all the PWs before the next date of hearing with
advance copy to the defendant(s) at least one week before the
next date of hearing.
List for PE on 01.10.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
13.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 3 Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
30.05.2026
Present: Sh. Raju, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith
plaintiff.
Sh. Aditya, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through
alongwith defendant.
Rectified WS alongwith necessary affidavit has been
filed by the defendant. Taken on record. Copy supplied.
The plaintiff is directed to file replication, if any,
with advance copy to the opposite party before the NDOH.
Be put up for completion of pleadings, admission-
denial/ framing of issues on 13.08.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
30.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8 Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
23.12.2025
Present: Sh. Raju, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Aditiya, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through
V/C alongwith defendant.
Previous cost of Rs.2,000/- paid by the defendant to
the plaintiff.
Replication / rejoinder has been filed on behalf of
the plaintiff. Taken on record. Copy supplied.
Further, it is submitted by the ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff that the affidavit filed alongwith the WS is not that of
the defendant but of his ld. Counsel which is not legally
permissible.
Upon perusal of the court file, it is seen that the hard
copy of the WS has not been filed at all. Ld. Counsel for the
defendant submits that he would verify and apprise this court
regarding the hard copy of the WS as well as the confusion
regarding the affidavit filed alongwith the WS positively on the
NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 02.03.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
23.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 17 Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
23.09.2025
Present: Sh. Raju, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith
plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
No WS has been filed by the defendant within the
prescribed period. The defendant submits that he was under the
impression that the WS has already been e-filed by his counsel
and he is surprised to know that the same has not been done.
Considering the submission and the fact that the
litigant ought not be penalised for the fault of his counsel, the
defendant is given one final opportunity to file the WS. However,
a cost of Rs.2,000/- is imposed upon the defendant to be paid the
plaintiff on the NDOH for the delay and inconvenience caused.
Be put up for filing of WS / further proceedings on
23.12.2025.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
23.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
13.05.2025
Present: Plaintiff in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Mr. Raju.
Defendant in person.
Mr. Aditya, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through
VC.
Ex parte evidence already filed. Taken on record.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant states that some time
may be granted to file appropriate application seeking recall of
ex parte proceedings. Opposed.
It is seen that the defendant was served as far back
as in November 2024. Considerable delay has already been
caused. Considering the same, adjournment sought is allowed
subject to a cost of Rs. 1,000/- to be paid to the plaintiff on
NDOH. It is made clear that if for any reason whatsoever proper
application is not filed with an advance copy to the plaintiff by
NDOH, no such accommodation shall be made.
Re-list on 21.07.2025.
(Gaurav Sharma)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
13.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
04.03.2025
Present: Plaintiff in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Mr. Raju.
On perusal of the case file, it is observed that
summons issued to the defendant were returned back executed /
served on 18.11.2024. Ld. Counsel has also filed tracking report
alongwith affidavit as per which the defendant was served on
16.11.2024 at the residential address. Taken on record.
No WS filed till date. Statutory period of filing WS
has already expired. Therefore, defence of defendant is struck
off.
None has appeared for defendant since date of
service. Hence, he is proceeded ex-parte.
Put up for ex-parte PE on 13.05.2025.
(Gaurav Sharma)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
04.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
30.11.2024
Ld. P.O. is on leave today.
Present: Sh. Raju and Sh. M.K. Singh, Ld. Counsels for plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Put up for further proceedings on 04.03.2025.
Ahlmad in the court of
ASCJ/JSCC/Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/30.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 Civ Suit 784/24
JAGDISH KUMAR PAWAR Vs. RAHUL NAGLE
16.10.2024
Fresh suit received by way of assignment through e-filing. It be checked and
registered.
Present : Sh. Raju and Sh. M. K. Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff.
Present suit has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff for recovery
of Rs. 2,30,000/- against the defendant.
Submission heard on the maintainability of the present suit.
Present suit seems to have been filed within the period of
limitation as well as jurisdiction of this Court.
Issue summons to the defendant at the given address on filing of
PF, RC, Speed Post along with copy of plaint and documents within 7 days
from today, returnable for the NDOH.
Now, put up for report on summons / further proceedings on
30.11.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/16.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --