Skip to main content
Civ Suit - CIVIL SUIT FOR CIVIL JUDGE

Bhawani Shankar +1 moreVsMunicipal Corporation of Delhi

CNR DLET03001174202476-Addl. Senior Civil Judge
Karkardooma, Senior Civil Judge cum RC Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
Decision Date: 04th October 2024

TrustJury record updated 17 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
728/2024
Registration Date
24 Sept 2024

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Petitioner

    1. 1Bhawani Shankar
    2. 2KAMLESH

    Respondent

    1. 1Municipal Corporation of Delhi

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Permanent Injuction · Sec 391&2

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 25-09-2024
Business: Adjourned
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 04-10-2024

Date: 04-10-2024
Business: DAW
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
Disposal Date: 04-10-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 1171/2024
Filing Date: 24-09-2024
eFiling Number: ADL20230016987C202400011
eFiling Date: 23-09-2024
First Hearing Date: 25th September 2024
Decision Date: 04th October 2024
Court Number And Judge: 76-Addl. Senior Civil Judge

    Orders

    3
    Final Order 2
    04 Oct 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 25 Civ Suit 728/24
BHAWANI SHANKAR Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
04.10.2024
Present : Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith plaintiff.
Today counsel for the plaintiffs has submitted before the court
that he is voluntarily withdrawing the present suit before this court and he
shall file the appropriate proceedings before the Ld. ATMCD as demolition
order has already been passed against the property of the plaintiffs by the
MCD and the jurisdiction to deal with the matter lies before the Ld. ATMCD
as per the provision of the DMC Act.
Separate statement of the counsel for the plaintiffs is recorded to
this effect. In view of the same, the present matter is dismissed as withdrawn
by the plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs may takes appropriate remedies as per law before the
Ld. ATMCD for redressal of their grievances.
Further original documents of the plaintiffs be returned to the
plaintiffs after placing on record certified copies of the same as per rules.
No further action is required. File be consigned to record room
after completion of due formalities.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/04.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    25 Sept 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 728/2024
Bhawani Shankar Vs. MCD
25.09.2024
Fresh suit has been received by way of the assignment through e-filing. It be
checked and registered.
Present : Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff against the MCD for
permanent injunction.
Ld. Proxy counsel for plaintiff has submitted that a demolition
order under Section 343 of DMC Act has been issued by the MCD qua the
suit property belonging to the plaintiff. Accordingly, the present suit filed by
the plaintiff for permanent injunction before this court does not seem to be
maintainable in terms of provisions of the DMC, Act 1957.
Ld. Porxy counsel for the plaintiff has requested for one
opportunity to satisify the court on the aspect of maintainability of the
present suit on the NDOH as the main counsel is not available today.
Said request is allowed.
Now, put up for consideration on the aspect of the
maintainability of the present suit on 04.10.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/25.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    25 Sept 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 728/2024
Bhawani Shankar Vs. MCD
25.09.2024
Fresh suit has been received by way of the assignment through e-filing. It be
checked and registered.
Present : Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff against the MCD for
permanent injunction.
Ld. Proxy counsel for plaintiff has submitted that a demolition
order under Section 343 of DMC Act has been issued by the MCD qua the
suit property belonging to the plaintiff. Accordingly, the present suit filed by
the plaintiff for permanent injunction before this court does not seem to be
maintainable in terms of provisions of the DMC, Act 1957.
Ld. Porxy counsel for the plaintiff has requested for one
opportunity to satisify the court on the aspect of maintainability of the
present suit on the NDOH as the main counsel is not available today.
Said request is allowed.
Now, put up for consideration on the aspect of the
maintainability of the present suit on 04.10.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/25.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.