RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN) +1 moreVsOm Prakash

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Order
22 RC ARC 43/23 RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN) Vs. OM PRAKASH
15.04.2025
Present: Petitioner in person.
Sh. Jamaluddin, Ld counsel for the respondent.
Put up for orders at 03:00 P.M.
(VINIK JAIN)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/15.04.2025
At 03:00 P.M
Present: None.
Vide my separate order of even date, the application of the
respondent seeking leave to defend is dismissed. Accordingly, eviction order is
passed in favour of the petitioners and against the respondent directing the
respondent to vacate the tenanted one shop in property bearing no. 109, Ground
floor, South Anarkali Extension, Delhi-110051 specifically shown in red colour in
-- 1 of 2 --
the site plan filed by the petitioners, in terms of Section 14 (1) (e) r/w Section 25-
B of the Delhi Rent Control Act. The landlord, however, shall not be entitled to
obtain possession thereof before the expiration of a period of six months from the
date of this order.
File be consigned to Record room.
(VINIK JAIN)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/15.04.2025
-- 2 of 2 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 RC ARC 43/23 RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN) Vs. OM
PRAKASH
01.03.2025
Present: Sh. Pankaj Singhal, Ld counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Jamaluddin, Ld counsel for the respondent.
Arguments heard on the application seeking leave to defend.
Put up for clarifications, if any/orders on 15.04.2025.
(VINIK JAIN)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/01.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 27 RC ARC 43/23
RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN) Vs. OM PRAKASH
07.12.2024
Present: Sh. Anupam Jindal, Ld. Counsel for petitioner
Sh. Neel Kumar Sharma, Ld. counsel for respondent no.1.
In this matter, arguments were heard by the Ld. Predecessor of
this Court. Thus, arguments are required to be heard afresh.
Put up on 01.03.2025 for arguments.
(VINIK JAIN)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/07.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 27RC ARC43/23RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN) Vs. OM PRAKASH
16.08.2024
Present: None for the petitioner.
Sh. Neel Kumar Sharma, Ld. counsel for the respondent (through
VC).
Put up for orders at 04:00 P.M.
(VINOD JOSHI)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/16.08.2024
At 04:00 P.M
Present: None.
No time left due to dictating the judgments titled as “Rampyaree vs
Vipin Sethi” and “Rampyaree vs Vinod Gupta & Ors” and also attending the
building maintenance meeting at 04:00 P.M.
Put up for clarifications, if any/orders on 16.10.2024.
(VINOD JOSHI)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/16.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 30RC ARC43/23RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN) Vs. OM PRAKASH
04.06.2024
Present: Sh. Pankaj Singhal, Ld. counsel for the petitioner (through VC)..
Sh. Neel Kumar Sharma, Ld. counsel for the respondent with
respondent.
Put up for orders at 04:00 P.M.
(VINOD JOSHI)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/04.06.2024
At 04:00 P.M
Present: None.
No time left due to dictating the judgments titled as Rajendri vs
Ram Babu & Ors vs Angoori Devi vs Manoj Kumar.
Put up for orders on 16.08.2024.
(VINOD JOSHI)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/04.06.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: .Arguments30RC ARC43/23RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN) Vs. OM
PRAKASH
10.04.2024
Present: Sh. Pankaj Singhal, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Anil Kumar Sharma, Ld proxy counsel for the respondent with
respondent.
Written submissions have been filed on behalf of the respondent
Copy supplied.
Written submissions have also been filed on behalf of the
petitioner today. Copy supplied.
Cost paid by the respondent to the Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
Further submissions heard.
Put up for clarifications, if any/orders on 04.06.2024.
(VINOD JOSHI)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/10.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 24
RC ARC
43/23
RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN)
Vs.
OM PRAKASH
17.02.2024
Present: Sh. Pankaj Singhal, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Neel Kumar Sharma, Ld proxy counsel for the respondent.
An application has been filed on behalf of the respondent for
waiving of cost.
Heard. Record perused.
The court does not find any cogent reason to allow the said
application. The same stands dismissed. Respondent is directed to pay the cost
on the next date of hearing failing which further cost of Rs 2,000/- shall be
imposed upon the respondent.
Arguments heard.
Put up for clarifications, if any/orders on 10.04.2024.
Parties are at liberty to file written arguments not exceeding 2
pages by the next date of hearing with advance copy to opposite side.
(VINOD JOSHI)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/17.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 28.
RC/ARC 43/23
RAKESH SINGH (SR. CITIZEN) VS. OM PRAKASH
14.12.2023
Present: Sh. Pankaj Singhal Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Himanshi Ld. Proxy Counsel for respondent
alongwith respondent.
Case is fixed for arguments on leave to defend
application.
Adjournment is requested on behalf of respondent
for filing rejoinder as well as arguments on the application.
Adjournment is vehemently opposed by counsel for
respondent on the ground that despite his non availability in
Karkardooma Courts except for Wednesday and Saturday, date
was fixed at the request of counsel for respondent for today.
Counsel for petitioner has submitted that respondent is trying to
delay the matter by these tactics.
In the interest of justice, subject to cost of \rs.2,000/-
to be paid to the petitioner, matter is adjourned for filing
rejoinder within 7 days from today with atleast 15 days advance
copy of the same to petitioner and for arguments on leave to
defend application on 17.02.2023.
(MAYANK MITTAL)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC(E)
KKD Courts, Delhi/14.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20
RC ARC
43/23
RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN)
Vs.
OM PRAKASH
13.09.2023
Present: Petitioner with Ld. counsel Sh. Pankaj Singhal.
Ms. Himanshi, Ld. proxy counsel for the respondent with respondent.
Notice issued to the respondent was served on 02.08.2023. Leave to
defend was filed on behalf of the respondent on 17.08.2023. It is submitted by Ld.
counsel for the petitioner that he has already received the copy of leave to defend
application. Reply to the application for leave to defend application filed on behalf of
the petitioner. Copy supplied. Respondent shall file rejoinder on the next date of
hearing. Respondent is directed to supply advance copy of rejoinder to the petitioner
atleast 15 days before the next date of hearing.
Put up for arguments on the application seeking leave to defend on
14.12.2023.
(MAYANK MITTAL)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC(E)
KKD Courts, Delhi/13.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 22
RC ARC
43/23
RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN)
Vs.
OM PRAKASH
Fresh petition under Section 14 (1) (e) read with Section 25-B of DRC
Act received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.
24.07.2023
Present: Sh. M K Singh, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
Heard. Record perused.
Issue notice of the petition to the respondent in the form specified in the
Third Schedule of the DRC Act, 1958 on filing of PF/RC for the next date.
Respondent shall file his leave to defend application within time
stipulated by law and to supply advance copy of the same to the petitioner atleast 15
days before the next date of hearing. Petitioner shall file his reply on the next date.
Put up on 13.09.2023.
(MAYANK MITTAL)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC(E)
KKD Courts, Delhi/24.07.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 RC ARC 43/23 RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN) Vs. OM
PRAKASH
01.03.2025
Present: Sh. Pankaj Singhal, Ld counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Jamaluddin, Ld counsel for the respondent.
Arguments heard on the application seeking leave to defend.
Put up for clarifications, if any/orders on 15.04.2025.
(VINIK JAIN)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/01.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 27 RC ARC 43/23
RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN) Vs. OM PRAKASH
07.12.2024
Present: Sh. Anupam Jindal, Ld. Counsel for petitioner
Sh. Neel Kumar Sharma, Ld. counsel for respondent no.1.
In this matter, arguments were heard by the Ld. Predecessor of
this Court. Thus, arguments are required to be heard afresh.
Put up on 01.03.2025 for arguments.
(VINIK JAIN)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/07.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 27RC ARC43/23RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN) Vs. OM PRAKASH
16.08.2024
Present: None for the petitioner.
Sh. Neel Kumar Sharma, Ld. counsel for the respondent (through
VC).
Put up for orders at 04:00 P.M.
(VINOD JOSHI)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/16.08.2024
At 04:00 P.M
Present: None.
No time left due to dictating the judgments titled as “Rampyaree vs
Vipin Sethi” and “Rampyaree vs Vinod Gupta & Ors” and also attending the
building maintenance meeting at 04:00 P.M.
Put up for clarifications, if any/orders on 16.10.2024.
(VINOD JOSHI)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/16.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 30RC ARC43/23RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN) Vs. OM PRAKASH
04.06.2024
Present: Sh. Pankaj Singhal, Ld. counsel for the petitioner (through VC)..
Sh. Neel Kumar Sharma, Ld. counsel for the respondent with
respondent.
Put up for orders at 04:00 P.M.
(VINOD JOSHI)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/04.06.2024
At 04:00 P.M
Present: None.
No time left due to dictating the judgments titled as Rajendri vs
Ram Babu & Ors vs Angoori Devi vs Manoj Kumar.
Put up for orders on 16.08.2024.
(VINOD JOSHI)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/04.06.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: .Arguments30RC ARC43/23RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN) Vs. OM
PRAKASH
10.04.2024
Present: Sh. Pankaj Singhal, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Anil Kumar Sharma, Ld proxy counsel for the respondent with
respondent.
Written submissions have been filed on behalf of the respondent
Copy supplied.
Written submissions have also been filed on behalf of the
petitioner today. Copy supplied.
Cost paid by the respondent to the Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
Further submissions heard.
Put up for clarifications, if any/orders on 04.06.2024.
(VINOD JOSHI)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/10.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 24
RC ARC
43/23
RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN)
Vs.
OM PRAKASH
17.02.2024
Present: Sh. Pankaj Singhal, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Neel Kumar Sharma, Ld proxy counsel for the respondent.
An application has been filed on behalf of the respondent for
waiving of cost.
Heard. Record perused.
The court does not find any cogent reason to allow the said
application. The same stands dismissed. Respondent is directed to pay the cost
on the next date of hearing failing which further cost of Rs 2,000/- shall be
imposed upon the respondent.
Arguments heard.
Put up for clarifications, if any/orders on 10.04.2024.
Parties are at liberty to file written arguments not exceeding 2
pages by the next date of hearing with advance copy to opposite side.
(VINOD JOSHI)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
KKD Courts, Delhi/17.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 28.
RC/ARC 43/23
RAKESH SINGH (SR. CITIZEN) VS. OM PRAKASH
14.12.2023
Present: Sh. Pankaj Singhal Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Himanshi Ld. Proxy Counsel for respondent
alongwith respondent.
Case is fixed for arguments on leave to defend
application.
Adjournment is requested on behalf of respondent
for filing rejoinder as well as arguments on the application.
Adjournment is vehemently opposed by counsel for
respondent on the ground that despite his non availability in
Karkardooma Courts except for Wednesday and Saturday, date
was fixed at the request of counsel for respondent for today.
Counsel for petitioner has submitted that respondent is trying to
delay the matter by these tactics.
In the interest of justice, subject to cost of \rs.2,000/-
to be paid to the petitioner, matter is adjourned for filing
rejoinder within 7 days from today with atleast 15 days advance
copy of the same to petitioner and for arguments on leave to
defend application on 17.02.2023.
(MAYANK MITTAL)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC(E)
KKD Courts, Delhi/14.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20
RC ARC
43/23
RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN)
Vs.
OM PRAKASH
13.09.2023
Present: Petitioner with Ld. counsel Sh. Pankaj Singhal.
Ms. Himanshi, Ld. proxy counsel for the respondent with respondent.
Notice issued to the respondent was served on 02.08.2023. Leave to
defend was filed on behalf of the respondent on 17.08.2023. It is submitted by Ld.
counsel for the petitioner that he has already received the copy of leave to defend
application. Reply to the application for leave to defend application filed on behalf of
the petitioner. Copy supplied. Respondent shall file rejoinder on the next date of
hearing. Respondent is directed to supply advance copy of rejoinder to the petitioner
atleast 15 days before the next date of hearing.
Put up for arguments on the application seeking leave to defend on
14.12.2023.
(MAYANK MITTAL)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC(E)
KKD Courts, Delhi/13.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 22
RC ARC
43/23
RAKESH SINGH (SENIOR CITIZEN)
Vs.
OM PRAKASH
Fresh petition under Section 14 (1) (e) read with Section 25-B of DRC
Act received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.
24.07.2023
Present: Sh. M K Singh, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
Heard. Record perused.
Issue notice of the petition to the respondent in the form specified in the
Third Schedule of the DRC Act, 1958 on filing of PF/RC for the next date.
Respondent shall file his leave to defend application within time
stipulated by law and to supply advance copy of the same to the petitioner atleast 15
days before the next date of hearing. Petitioner shall file his reply on the next date.
Put up on 13.09.2023.
(MAYANK MITTAL)
ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC(E)
KKD Courts, Delhi/24.07.2023
-- 1 of 1 --