Interim Order 5

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: -1-
20 Civ Suit 610/25
MUNNI DEVI Vs. ANITA SAINI
CNR No. DLET030009872025
08.09.2026
Present: Sh. D. Verma, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff.
Sh. Dhruv Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
through V/C.
Reply to the application under Order VIII Rule 1
CPC has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Taken on record
Heard. Record perused.
In view of the reasons mentioned and in the interest
of justice, the application stands allowed and the delay in filing
the WS is condoned. Accordingly, the WS of defendant no. 1 is
taken on record. However, defendant no. 1 is directed to pay a
cost of Rs.1,000/- to the plaintiff to compensate for the delay
caused on the NDOH.
Replication, rejoinder to the application under Order
XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC and reply to application under Order
VII Rule 11 CPC have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Taken
on record. A spare copy of the same has been placed on the court
file. The defendant is directed to get it collected within a week
from today.
Also, applications under Order XII Rule 6 CPC and
under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC have been filed on behalf
of the plaintiff. Taken on record. A spare copy of the same has
been placed on the court file. The defendant is directed to get it
collected within a week from today.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
The defendants are directed to file replies, if any, to
the aforementioned applications with advance copy to the
plaintiff at least a week prior to the NDOH.
At this stage, it is pointed out by the ld. Counsel for
the plaintiff that the WS has only been filed on behalf of
defendant no. 1. Ld. Counsel for the defendants seeks some time
to clarify whether he would file the written statements of the said
defendants alongwith requisite condonation of delay application
or would adopt the WS of defendant no. 1 on the NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 18.11.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
08.09.2026
-- 2 of 2 --