Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 11 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 31.10.2025 Present: Ms. Vasundara Nagrath and Sh. Shaurya Katoch, Ld counsels for the petitioner. Sh.…
Read Full Order →SATYAM THAREJAVsSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
TrustJury record updated 17 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 59/2025
- Registration Date
- 16 Jul 2025
- Case Stage
- Misc. cases
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Case Timeline
29 Sept 2026
1 recordCourt ProceedingLd. P.O. is on half day leave.
Next purpose: Misc. casesRead full proceedingHide details
Ld. P.O. is on half day leave.
Business: Ld. P.O. is on half day leave. Next Purpose: Misc. cases
03 Sept 2026
1 recordCourt ProceedingMisl.
Next purpose: Misc. casesRead full proceedingHide details
Misl.
Business: Misl. Next Purpose: Misc. cases
24 Jul 2026
1 recordCourt ProceedingLd. P.O. is on leave.
Next purpose: Misc. casesRead full proceedingHide details
Ld. P.O. is on leave.
Business: Ld. P.O. is on leave. Next Purpose: Misc. cases
22 May 2026
3 recordsCourt ProceedingMisl.
Next purpose: Misc. casesRead full proceedingHide details
Misl.
Business: Misl. Next Purpose: Misc. cases
Interim Order 8Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 7 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 22.05.2026 Present: Petitioner in person. Sh. Parmod Kumar Jain, Consultant, IEPF. Sh. Nishant Sharma, Ld…
View order details ↓Hide details ↑
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 7 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 22.05.2026 Present: Petitioner in person. Sh. Parmod Kumar Jain, Consultant, IEPF. Sh. Nishant Sharma, Ld counsel for respondent no.2 and 3. Sh. Sandeep Tyagi, Ld counsel for IEPF. Authority letter has been filed on behalf of IEPF. The same is taken on record. BTF has also been filed on behalf of IEPF. The same is taken on record. RW-3 is examined and discharged. Diet money paid, as per rules. It is submitted by the petitioner that he will move an application for calling the details of folio number of the companies of whom the deceased was holding shares. Heard and allowed. Put up for further proceedings on 24.07.2026. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/22.05.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 8Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 7 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 22.05.2026 Present: Petitioner in person. Sh. Parmod Kumar Jain, Consultant, IEPF. Sh. Nishant Sharma, Ld…
View order details ↓Hide details ↑
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 7 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 22.05.2026 Present: Petitioner in person. Sh. Parmod Kumar Jain, Consultant, IEPF. Sh. Nishant Sharma, Ld counsel for respondent no.2 and 3. Sh. Sandeep Tyagi, Ld counsel for IEPF. Authority letter has been filed on behalf of IEPF. The same is taken on record. BTF has also been filed on behalf of IEPF. The same is taken on record. RW-3 is examined and discharged. Diet money paid, as per rules. It is submitted by the petitioner that he will move an application for calling the details of folio number of the companies of whom the deceased was holding shares. Heard and allowed. Put up for further proceedings on 24.07.2026. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/22.05.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
06 Mar 2026
3 recordsCourt Proceedingfurther proceeding
Next purpose: Misc. casesRead full proceedingHide details
further proceeding
Business: further proceeding Next Purpose: Misc. cases
Interim Order 7Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 06.03.2026 Present: Sh. Shaurya Katoch, Ld. counsel for the petitioner (through VC). Sh. Nishant Sharma, Ld.…
View order details ↓Hide details ↑
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 06.03.2026 Present: Sh. Shaurya Katoch, Ld. counsel for the petitioner (through VC). Sh. Nishant Sharma, Ld. counsel for respondent no. 2 and 3. An application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for summoning IEPF. Heard. Record perused. In view of the averments made in the application, the application is allowed. On filing of PF/RC, let IEPF be summoned for the next date. Put up on 22.05.2026 (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC(East) KKD Court/Delhi/06.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 7Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 06.03.2026 Present: Sh. Shaurya Katoch, Ld. counsel for the petitioner (through VC). Sh. Nishant Sharma, Ld.…
View order details ↓Hide details ↑
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 06.03.2026 Present: Sh. Shaurya Katoch, Ld. counsel for the petitioner (through VC). Sh. Nishant Sharma, Ld. counsel for respondent no. 2 and 3. An application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for summoning IEPF. Heard. Record perused. In view of the averments made in the application, the application is allowed. On filing of PF/RC, let IEPF be summoned for the next date. Put up on 22.05.2026 (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC(East) KKD Court/Delhi/06.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
21 Jan 2026
3 recordsCourt ProceedingRW 2 EXAMINED.
Next purpose: Misc. casesRead full proceedingHide details
RW 2 EXAMINED.
Business: RW 2 EXAMINED. Next Purpose: Misc. cases
Interim Order 6Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 6 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 21.01.2026 Present: Petitioner with Ld counsel Sh. Shaurya Katoch. Sh. Vikas Pandey, AR for Kfin Technology…
View order details ↓Hide details ↑
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 6 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 21.01.2026 Present: Petitioner with Ld counsel Sh. Shaurya Katoch. Sh. Vikas Pandey, AR for Kfin Technology Limited (RTA of Reliance Industries Ltd) Sh. Nishant, Ld counsel for respondent no. 2 and 3. It is submitted by AR for Kfin Technology Limited that 84 shares of Reliance Industries has already been transferred to the IEPF. Let notice be issued to IEPF on filing of PF/RC for the next date. RW2 is examined and discharged. Diet money paid, as per rules. Petitioner is directed to take steps for summoning of witnesses/respondents for the next date. Put up on 06.03.2026. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/21.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 6Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 6 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 21.01.2026 Present: Petitioner with Ld counsel Sh. Shaurya Katoch. Sh. Vikas Pandey, AR for Kfin Technology…
View order details ↓Hide details ↑
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 6 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 21.01.2026 Present: Petitioner with Ld counsel Sh. Shaurya Katoch. Sh. Vikas Pandey, AR for Kfin Technology Limited (RTA of Reliance Industries Ltd) Sh. Nishant, Ld counsel for respondent no. 2 and 3. It is submitted by AR for Kfin Technology Limited that 84 shares of Reliance Industries has already been transferred to the IEPF. Let notice be issued to IEPF on filing of PF/RC for the next date. RW2 is examined and discharged. Diet money paid, as per rules. Petitioner is directed to take steps for summoning of witnesses/respondents for the next date. Put up on 06.03.2026. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/21.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
09 Dec 2025
3 recordsCourt ProceedingCASE ADJOURNED.
Next purpose: Misc. casesRead full proceedingHide details
CASE ADJOURNED.
Business: CASE ADJOURNED. Next Purpose: Misc. cases
Interim Order 5Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 09.12.2025 Present: None for the petitioner. Sh. Vikas Pandey, AR for Kfin Technologies Private Limited. It…
View order details ↓Hide details ↑
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 09.12.2025 Present: None for the petitioner. Sh. Vikas Pandey, AR for Kfin Technologies Private Limited. It is submitted by Sh. Vikas Pandey that he cannot provide the details as the folio number has not been provided by the petitioner. Notice issued upon witnesses no. 2 and 4 have not been received back. Be awaited for the report. Two letters have been received from MUFG as per which no details can be provided as the information supplied insufficient. Be awaited for the petitioner till 10:25 A.M. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/09.12.2025 At 10:32 A.M Present: Petitioner in person. Sh. Nishant Sharma, Ld counsel for respondent no. 2 and 3. Petitioner is directed to take steps for summoning of witnesses/respondents for the next date. Put up on 21.01.2026. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/09.12.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 5Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 09.12.2025 Present: None for the petitioner. Sh. Vikas Pandey, AR for Kfin Technologies Private Limited. It…
View order details ↓Hide details ↑
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 09.12.2025 Present: None for the petitioner. Sh. Vikas Pandey, AR for Kfin Technologies Private Limited. It is submitted by Sh. Vikas Pandey that he cannot provide the details as the folio number has not been provided by the petitioner. Notice issued upon witnesses no. 2 and 4 have not been received back. Be awaited for the report. Two letters have been received from MUFG as per which no details can be provided as the information supplied insufficient. Be awaited for the petitioner till 10:25 A.M. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/09.12.2025 At 10:32 A.M Present: Petitioner in person. Sh. Nishant Sharma, Ld counsel for respondent no. 2 and 3. Petitioner is directed to take steps for summoning of witnesses/respondents for the next date. Put up on 21.01.2026. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/09.12.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
31 Oct 2025
3 recordsCourt ProceedingPUT UP FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
Next purpose: Misc. casesRead full proceedingHide details
PUT UP FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
Business: PUT UP FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Next Purpose: Misc. cases
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 11 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 31.10.2025 Present: Ms. Vasundara Nagrath and Sh. Shaurya Katoch, Ld counsels for the petitioner. Sh.…
Read Full Order →19 Sept 2025
3 recordsCourt ProceedingCASE ADJOURNED.
Next purpose: Misc. casesRead full proceedingHide details
CASE ADJOURNED.
Business: CASE ADJOURNED. Next Purpose: Misc. cases
Interim Order 3Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 11 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 19.09.2025 Present: Sh. Vasundara Nagarath, Ld counsel for the petitioner (through VC) Sh. Shourya, Ld proxy…
View order details ↓Hide details ↑
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 11 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 19.09.2025 Present: Sh. Vasundara Nagarath, Ld counsel for the petitioner (through VC) Sh. Shourya, Ld proxy counsel for the petitioner. Sh. Nishant Sharma, Ld counsel for the R2 and R3. As per record, notice of the petition stands duly served upon respondent no.1 State by way of publication in newspaper Virat Vaibhav dated 13.09.2025. Report of publication is also available on record. 30 days have not yet expired since the date of service of publication. In between dates, report alongwith SMC has been filed on behalf of the SDM, concerned An application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for summoning of witness alongwith list of witnesses. Heard. Record perused. In view of the averments made in the application, the application is allowed. Petitioner is directed to take steps for summoning of witness as mentioned in the application on filing of PF/RC for the next date. Put up on 31.10.2025. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/19.09.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 3Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 11 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 19.09.2025 Present: Sh. Vasundara Nagarath, Ld counsel for the petitioner (through VC) Sh. Shourya, Ld proxy…
View order details ↓Hide details ↑
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 11 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 19.09.2025 Present: Sh. Vasundara Nagarath, Ld counsel for the petitioner (through VC) Sh. Shourya, Ld proxy counsel for the petitioner. Sh. Nishant Sharma, Ld counsel for the R2 and R3. As per record, notice of the petition stands duly served upon respondent no.1 State by way of publication in newspaper Virat Vaibhav dated 13.09.2025. Report of publication is also available on record. 30 days have not yet expired since the date of service of publication. In between dates, report alongwith SMC has been filed on behalf of the SDM, concerned An application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for summoning of witness alongwith list of witnesses. Heard. Record perused. In view of the averments made in the application, the application is allowed. Petitioner is directed to take steps for summoning of witness as mentioned in the application on filing of PF/RC for the next date. Put up on 31.10.2025. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/19.09.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
30 Jul 2025
3 recordsCourt ProceedingCASE ADJOURNED.
Next purpose: Misc. casesRead full proceedingHide details
CASE ADJOURNED.
Business: CASE ADJOURNED. Next Purpose: Misc. cases
Interim Order 2Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 8 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 30.07.2025 Present: Ms. Vasundhara, Ld counsel for the petitioner (through VC). Petitioner in person (through…
View order details ↓Hide details ↑
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 8 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 30.07.2025 Present: Ms. Vasundhara, Ld counsel for the petitioner (through VC). Petitioner in person (through VC). Heard. Record perused. Issue notice of the petition to the State by way of publication in the newspaper 'Virat Vaibhav'. Petitioner to take all steps for publication. Also issue notice of the petition upon respondents on filing of PF/RC by the petitioner for the next date. Petitioner is directed to take steps for summoning of witnesses for the next date. Petitioner is directed to take steps for service to SDM concerned, if applied for, for bringing the report of surviving member certificate of deceased on the next date of hearing. Put up on 19.09.2025. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/30.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 2Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 8 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 30.07.2025 Present: Ms. Vasundhara, Ld counsel for the petitioner (through VC). Petitioner in person (through…
View order details ↓Hide details ↑
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 8 SUCCESSION COURT 59/25 SATYAM THAREJA Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 30.07.2025 Present: Ms. Vasundhara, Ld counsel for the petitioner (through VC). Petitioner in person (through VC). Heard. Record perused. Issue notice of the petition to the State by way of publication in the newspaper 'Virat Vaibhav'. Petitioner to take all steps for publication. Also issue notice of the petition upon respondents on filing of PF/RC by the petitioner for the next date. Petitioner is directed to take steps for summoning of witnesses for the next date. Petitioner is directed to take steps for service to SDM concerned, if applied for, for bringing the report of surviving member certificate of deceased on the next date of hearing. Put up on 19.09.2025. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/30.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 879/2025 Filing Date: 16-07-2025 eFiling Number: ADL20240001569C202500010 eFiling Date: 15-07-2025 First Hearing Date: 17th July 2025 Court Number And Judge: 66-ACJ/CCJ/ARC
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
