Full Order Text
Order 3 · 04 Jul 2023 · CNR DLET030006372023
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Civ Suit337/23 RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION MINI MIG FLATS Vs.RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION NEW MIG FLATS 04.07.2023 Pr. Sh. Swaran Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Ld. Counsel for the defendant no.1. Sh. O. P. Pahuja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 2. Ms. Madhu Chaudhary, Proxy counsel for MCD alongwith Sh. Khushi Ram, Assistant Engineer, MCD. Fresh Vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant no. 1. Be taken on record. Ld. Counsel appearing for Mother Dairy /defendant no. 2 submits that defendant no. 2 is no more concerned with the structure in question as they have already left the charge of the same. He further submits that the structure has already been demolished. It is his submission that he be dropped from the array of parties as the suit of the plaintiff against D2 (Mother Dairy) has become infructuous. Status report has filed on behalf of D3/MCD wherein a similar submission has been made that the booth has already been demolished by Mother Dairy itself. At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff concedes to the fact that the Mother Dairy booth has been demolished and submits that he has no further grievance against defendant no. 2. He accordingly, seeks permission to drop the proceedings against defendant no. 2 i.e. Mother Dairy. Heard. Separate statement of Ld. Counsel for plaintiff is recorded to this effect. PTO -- 1 of 2 -- 2 In view of the same, defendant no. 2 is hereby dropped from the array of parties by resorting to the Provision under Order I Rule 10 CPC. Amended memo of parties be filed on record by NDOH. At this stage, it is submitted by the Ld. Counsels for the defendants no. 1 & 3 that they have not received the legible copies of the plaint and annexures. Legible copies has been supplied by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff to the defendants. W/S, if any, be filed within the period of limitation with advance copy to opposite party. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that the structure in question has been raised by defendant no. 1 and not by DDA as has been alleged in the status report filed by MCD. Sh. Khushi Ram, Assistant Engineer, MCD has countered the same submitting that the structure was raised by DDA and the defendant no. 1 has merely renovated the same. He submits that the MCD has now taken over the possession of the said structure /room. He submits that he shall file a detailed report regarding the same on NDOH. At this stage, both parties want to explore possibilities of settlement before the Mediation Centre. Accordingly, the matter is referred to the Mediation Centre for 11.07.2023 at 2.00pm. To come up for further proceedings on 12.10.2023. (Prigya Gupta) ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge, East, KKD Courts, Delhi/04.07.2023 -- 2 of 2 --
