Skip to main content
SUCCESSION COURT

HONEYVsSTATE +3 more

CNR DLET03000365202666-ACJ/CCJ/ARC
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 17 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
26/2026
Registration Date
25 Mar 2026
Next Hearing Date
14 Dec 2026
Case Stage
Misc. cases

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    5

    Acts & Sections

    1
    The Indian Succession Act 1925 · Sec 372

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 27-03-2026
    Business: put up on
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases
    Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2026
    
    Date: 23-04-2026
    Business: Misl.
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases
    Next Hearing Date: 06-08-2026
    
    Date: 06-08-2026
    Business: Misl.
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases
    Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2026
    
    Date: 17-09-2026
    Business: Misl.
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases
    Next Hearing Date: 14-12-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 367/2026
    Filing Date: 25-03-2026
    eFiling Number: ADL20230002175C202600025
    eFiling Date: 25-03-2026
    First Hearing Date: 27th March 2026
    Court Number And Judge: 66-ACJ/CCJ/ARC

    Orders

    8
    Interim Order 4
    17 Sept 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 10 SUCCESSIONCOURT 26/26
    HONEY Vs. STATE
    17.09.2026
    Present: Sh. Umesh Chand Mishra Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
    Sh. Amit Kumar, Asstt. Section Office on behalf of respondent
    no.2.
    Sh. Sunil Rathore Ld. Counsel for respondent no.4 through VC.
    Md. Imran Ld. Proxy counsel for respondent no.3.
    Reply to the present succession petition has been filed on
    behalf of respondent No.3. Copy supplied.
    Ld. Counsel for respondent No.4 submitted that he shall be
    filing WS during the course of the day. Let the same be done with advance
    copy to opposite party.
    Be put up on 14.12.2026.
    (NITISH KUMAR SHARMA)
    ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
    KKD Courts, Delhi/17.09.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3Full order available
    06 Aug 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 6 SUCCESSION COURT 26/26 HONEY Vs. STATE 06.08.2026 Present: Sh. Umesh Chand Mishra, Ld counsel for the petitioner. Sh. Sushil Kumar, Ld counsel for respondent no.3. Respondent no. 4 in person. In between dates, amended memo of parties has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. The same is taken record. Fresh Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent no.3. The same is taken on record. As per record, notice of the petition stands…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 2Full order available
    23 Apr 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 SUCCESSION COURT 26/26 HONEY Vs. STATE 23.04.2026 Present: Mother of the petitioner in person. Matter is passed over for appearance of Ld counsel for the petitioner till 10:45 A.M. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/23.04.2026 At 11:00 A.M Present: Mother of the petitioner in person. Matter is passed over for appearance of Ld counsel for the petitioner till 11:30 A.M. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/23.04.2026 At 12:20 P.M Present:…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 1
    27 Mar 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 16 SUCCESSION COURT 26/26
    HONEY Vs. STATE
    Fresh succession petition received by way of e-filing.
    27.03.2026 (At 11:30 A.M)
    Present: None.
    None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated
    calls.
    Put up on 23.04.2026.
    (VINIK JAIN)
    ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
    KKD Courts, Delhi/27.03.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    17 Sept 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 10 SUCCESSIONCOURT 26/26
    HONEY Vs. STATE
    17.09.2026
    Present: Sh. Umesh Chand Mishra Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
    Sh. Amit Kumar, Asstt. Section Office on behalf of respondent
    no.2.
    Sh. Sunil Rathore Ld. Counsel for respondent no.4 through VC.
    Md. Imran Ld. Proxy counsel for respondent no.3.
    Reply to the present succession petition has been filed on
    behalf of respondent No.3. Copy supplied.
    Ld. Counsel for respondent No.4 submitted that he shall be
    filing WS during the course of the day. Let the same be done with advance
    copy to opposite party.
    Be put up on 14.12.2026.
    (NITISH KUMAR SHARMA)
    ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
    KKD Courts, Delhi/17.09.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3Full order available
    06 Aug 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 6 SUCCESSION COURT 26/26 HONEY Vs. STATE 06.08.2026 Present: Sh. Umesh Chand Mishra, Ld counsel for the petitioner. Sh. Sushil Kumar, Ld counsel for respondent no.3. Respondent no. 4 in person. In between dates, amended memo of parties has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. The same is taken record. Fresh Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent no.3. The same is taken on record. As per record, notice of the petition stands…

    Read Full Order
    Order 2Full order available
    23 Apr 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 SUCCESSION COURT 26/26 HONEY Vs. STATE 23.04.2026 Present: Mother of the petitioner in person. Matter is passed over for appearance of Ld counsel for the petitioner till 10:45 A.M. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/23.04.2026 At 11:00 A.M Present: Mother of the petitioner in person. Matter is passed over for appearance of Ld counsel for the petitioner till 11:30 A.M. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/23.04.2026 At 12:20 P.M Present:…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1
    27 Mar 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 16 SUCCESSION COURT 26/26
    HONEY Vs. STATE
    Fresh succession petition received by way of e-filing.
    27.03.2026 (At 11:30 A.M)
    Present: None.
    None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated
    calls.
    Put up on 23.04.2026.
    (VINIK JAIN)
    ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East)
    KKD Courts, Delhi/27.03.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.