Full Order Text
Order 2 · 07 Nov 2025 · CNR DLET020372412025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: (Sidhant Krishan Singh) JMFC (NI Act) Digital Court-01 East /KKD 07.11.2025 32 CC NI ACT / 2729/2025 SHABNAM Vs. RUBEENA (Mayur Vihar) 07.11.2025 Matter is taken up on VC. Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Sh. Mohd. Danish, Ld. Counsel for the complainant alongwith complainant in person. The present complaint has been filed u/s 138 NI Act. The complaint, documents and evidence by way of affidavit perused. I take cognizance of the said offence. Arguments heard on summoning. Record perused. On consideration of the complaint, annexed documents and verification affidavit of the complainant and in the light of the law lay down in A.C. Narayan Vs. State of Maharashtra (2014) 11 SCC 790, this court is of the opinion that the prima facie there are sufficient grounds for proceedings against the accused for commission of offence u/s 138 NI Act. The complainant has filed the complaint within limitation period. In terms of inquiry conducted u/s 202 Cr.P.C., all the statutory requirement have been complied with. Accordingly, issue summons against the accused on filing of PF by the complainant through all modes. As per the guideline laid down in the case titled Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayyed Baba Lal H. reported in (2010) 5 SCC 663, Ahlmad is directed to make a mention in the summons issued that: “ Accused can make an application for compounding of the offence at the first and second hearing of the case and if such an application is made compounding may be allowed by the Court without imposing any cost on the accused”. List for appearance of the accused, furnishing of bail bonds and framing of notice on 21.08.2026. Process server is directed to ensure that the summons are served upon the accused at least four days prior to the NDOH. -- 1 of 1 --