Order 3

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 35 2231/2024 SHEETAL BABBAR Vs. VANDNA
02.04.2025
Present: Ld counsel for complainant with complainant.
Proposed accused absent.
Sh Pradeep Sharma, Ld counsel for proposed accused.
Oral exemption is sought on behalf of proposed accused. Same is
allowed for today only.
Submissions heard on point of summoning.
Record of the file perused. All the statutory requirements under NI Act
are complied with. After perusal of the entire record, this Court is of the considered
opinion that prima facie case punishable u/s 138 of NI Act is made out against the
accused. I, therefore, take cognizance of the said offence.
Arguments heard on the point of summoning. Following the law laid
down in A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (2014) 11 SCC 790,
complaint, affidavit of evidence and documents considered. In view of complaint;
documents produced with respect to return of cheque on dishonourment and service
of legal demand notice; and verification in the form of affidavit of evidence, there
are sufficient grounds for proceeding further against accused for offence punishable
under Section 138 NI Act.
Since the accused has already entered her appearance, her formal
summoning is dispensed with.
Accused is directed to appear in person with her bail bonds.
Be put up for appearance of accused/framing of notice/furnishing of
bail bonds on 11.07.2025.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC( NI Act), East/KKD/Delhi/02.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --