Full Order Text
Order 3 · 18 Jan 2025 · CNR DLET020126622024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 25 CC NI ACT / 1844/2024 Shiv Shakti Singh Raghav Vs. Augustin Wilson / () 18.01.2025 Present: Ld counsel for complainant. Proposed accused with Ld counsel. Fresh vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of accused. Taken on record. Ld counsel for proposed accused submits that copy of complaint has already been received. Submissions heard on point of summoning. Record of the file perused. All the statutory requirements under NI Act are complied with. After perusal of the entire record, this Court is of the considered opinion that prima facie case punishable u/s 138 of NI Act is made out against the accused. I, therefore, take cognizance of the said offence. Arguments heard on the point of summoning. Following the law laid down in A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (2014) 11 SCC 790, complaint, affidavit of evidence and documents considered. In view of complaint; documents produced with respect to return of cheque on dishonourment and service of legal demand notice; and verification in the form of affidavit of evidence, there are sufficient grounds for proceeding further against accused for offence punishable under Section 138 NI Act. Since the accused has already entered his appearance, his formal summoning is dispensed with. Accused seeks time to furnish his bail bonds. Allowed. Be put up for furnisning of bail bonds/framing of notice on 22.03.2025. (Navdeep Gupta) JM1stC (NI Act), East/ KKD,Delhi/18.01.2025 -- 1 of 1 --