Final Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13. Misc. CRL No. 6921/2026
FIR. No. 0003/2026, PS: YDM
State Vs. Yamin & Anr.
Applicant: Deepak Gohania
18.03.2026
Present: Ld. Subs. APP for the State.
Ms. Sandhya Dutt, Ld. Counsel for applicant.
Applicant in person.
This is an application moved by applicant for release of mobile
phone make Redmi Note 6 Pro IMEI No. 869865041259991, (2)
86986504125007 on superdari.
Reply to the application has been filed by the IO. Perused. As per the
reply, the IO has not objected to the application stating that the mobile phone is
not required by the police.
I have heard the applicant. Perused the record.
As per the directions of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Manjit
Singh vs. State in Crl MC No. 4485/13 dated 10.09.2014, case property may be
released to the rightful owner after preparing detailed panchnama, taking
photographs, valuation report and a security bond. Further, production of mobile
should not be insisted upon during trial and its photographs along with
panchnama should suffice for the purpose of evidence.
In view of above IO/SHO is directed to release the mobile phone make
Redmi Note 6 Pro IMEI No. 869865041259991, (2) 86986504125007 to the
applicant/owner on furnishing security/ indemnity bond as per valuation of
mobile phone make Redmi Note 6 Pro IMEI No. 869865041259991, (2)
86986504126007. Valuation shall be done prior to releasing the mobile phone to
the applicant. A detailed panchnama shall be prepared after taking photographs of
the mobile phone from all angles and the same shall be attested/countersigned by
complainant as well as accused. The cost of photographs shall be borne by the
applicant. Panchnama along with photographs and indemnity bond shall be filed
in the court along with charge-sheet.
Copy of this order be given dasti to the applicant.
(Satendra Pal Singh)
JMFC-04/East/KKD Delhi
Date: 18/03/2026(K)
-- 1 of 1 --