Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 2

CNR DLET02012135202612 Mar 2026
Karkardooma, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 2 · 12 Mar 2026 · CNR DLET020121352026

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10 BAIL MATTERS / 198/2026 State Vs. Manpreet Singh
FIR No. 80005711/2026 (Preet Vihar)
12.03.2026
Application for bail u/s 480 BNSS filed on behalf of accused Manpreet
Singh.
Present: Sh. Chetan Mittal, Ld. APP for State.
Sh. Tajinder Singh, Ld. Counsel for accused/ applicant.
IO SI Shankar in person.
Reply to the bail application filed. Same is taken on record.
It is stated in the application that the applicant/accused is
languishing in JC since 07.03.2026; that the accused is innocent and falsely
implicated in the present case; that the accused was arrested on 01.03.2026
on the disclosure statement of main accused Avtar Singh; that nothing has
been recovered from the possession of accused; that the accused is an auto-
driver; that the accused is sole bread earner and has the responsibility of his
family; that there are three-four false cases are pending against the applicant/
accused and he is not previously convicted in any other criminal case; that
the investigation/ interrogation qua the accused has already been completed
and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused behind the
bars. It is further stated that accused is ready to abide by the terms &
conditions as may be imposed by this court and to furnish reliable surety to
the entire satisfaction of the court. Hence, it is prayed that the accused may
be granted bail.
Ld. APP for the State as well as IO have strongly opposed the
bail application of the accused.
Submissions heard. Reply perused.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
State Vs. Manpreet Singh @ Sunny Page No.1 of 2
FIR No.80005711/2026
PS: Preet Vihar
-- 1 of 2 --
Considering the facts & circumstances of the case coupled with
the fact that the allegations are serious & grave in nature, investigation is at
nascent stage; there is flight risk if accused is granted bail, recovery of case
property is yet to be effected and considering the fact that bail is a rule and
jail is an exception, however, the larger public interest outweighs the personal
liberty of the applicant/ accused, this court does not deem it fit to grant bail to
the accused at this stage as it would adversely hamper the investigation.
Accordingly, bail application of accused Manpreet Singh @ Sunny is
dismissed. Bail application stands disposed of accordingly. Nothing
expressed herein above shall have bearing in the final merits of the case.
Copy of order be sent to Jail Superintendent concerned through e-mail as
well as dispatch rider.
Copy dasti.
(RINKU JAIN)
ACJM (EAST)/KKD/DELHI
12.03.2026
________________________________________________________________________________________________
State Vs. Manpreet Singh @ Sunny Page No.2 of 2
FIR No.80005711/2026
PS: Preet Vihar
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.