Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 2 CC NI ACT 3048/2023 DELHI NAGRIK SEHKARI BANK LTD. Vs.
VISHAL /0 (Krishna Nagar)
24.04.2025
Present: Ld counsel for complainant.
AR of the complainant in person.
Accused with Ld counsel.
Matter received back from Mediation Center as unsettled.
Bail bonds furnished. Same are accepted. Robkar, if required be issued.
Notice of accusation has been served upon the accused, to which
accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. His plea of defence has also been
recorded separately.
Admission & denial done. Therefore, witness no. 2 & 3 stand dropped
from the list of witnesses on account of admission by accused.
Considering the detailed defence taken by the accused, plausible
defence has been raised for which an opportunity for cross-examination of the
complainant is fit to be given to the accused u/s 145(2) NI Act. The need for filing a
formal application stands dispensed with.
In these circumstances, in view of the second proviso to section 143 (1)
of the NI Act, instead of being tried summarily, this case shall now be heard as a
summons trial case.
Be put up for CE on 26.08.2025.
(Navdeep Gupta)
JMFC (NI Act), East/ KKD,Delhi/24.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
