Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 21 May 2024 · CNR DLET020074982024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: BAIL MATTERS133/2024 Anguri Vs. State FIR No.0109 /2024 (PreetVihar) 21.05.2024 File taken up upon application U/s.437 Cr.PC for grant of bail filed on behalf of applicant/ accused Anguri. Present: Sh. Kalim Ahmed, Ld. APP for the State. Ms. Sajida Saifi, Ld. Counsel for applicant. IO SI Sher Singh in person. Reply to the bail application filed. Copy be supplied. Submissions heard. Record perused. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for accused that accused is in judicial custody since 09.05.2024, that the accused has been falsely implicated in this case, that nothing has been recovered from the accused, that the accused has no previous involvement in any case, that the accused has responsibility of her one minor child and that the accused is ready to abide by terms and conditions imposed by the court and since no useful purpose would be served by keeping the accused in custody, she be granted bail. Per contra, it is argued by Ld. APP with the assistance of IO that the offence involved serious in nature, if the accused released on bail, she may jump the bail and there are chances of the accused fleeing from justice and hence the present bail application be dismissed. Arguments heard. Record perused. Perusal of record reveals that in the present case registered on the complaint of Smt. Harsha Sharma, a theft of Rs. 75 Lakhs is said to be Page No.1 of 2 -- 1 of 2 -- committed from her house and from the CCTV footage on record, co- accused Rajesh was seeing to be carrying the stolen money from the building. Allegedly, co-accused Rajesh was working as security guard in the building of the complainant whilst accused Anguri was working as a maid in the house of the complainant and theft of Rs. 75 Lakhs is stated to have been committed by both the accused persons in connivance with each other, both being husband and wife. Recovery to the extent of above Rs. 58 Lakhs has also been made from the above accused persons. Accordingly, in light of the afore-stated facts and circumstances and considering the seriousness of the offence and the manner in which the offence was committed alongwith the fact that the investigation is underway and chances of committing of similar offence can not be ruled out and hence this Court is of the view that no ground is made out at this stage for grant of bail to the present applicant/ accused. Accordingly, the present bail application is hereby dismissed. The order be also uploaded on the website of Delhi District Court. Copy of the order be also sent to the Jail Superintendent through email and Dispatch Rider. Copy of the order be given dasti to Ld. counsel of the applicant. (VASUNDHARA AZAD) ACMM (EAST)/KKD/21.05.2024 Page No.2 of 2 -- 2 of 2 --
