Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

KESHAV KUMAR MISHRAVsAnkit Nath

CNR DLET020058432026768-Judicial Magistrate First Class NI Act-02
Karkardooma, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 17 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
652/2026
Registration Date
03 Feb 2026
Next Hearing Date
28 Jan 2027
Case Stage
Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1KESHAV KUMAR MISHRA

    Respondent

    1. 1Ankit Nath

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138 NI ACT

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 21-02-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: For Summon
Next Hearing Date: 06-06-2026

Date: 06-06-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: For Summon
Next Hearing Date: 27-06-2026

Date: 27-06-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 29-08-2026

Date: 29-08-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 28-01-2027

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 5843/2026
Filing Date: 02-02-2026
eFiling Number: ADL20240013519C202600017
eFiling Date: 31-01-2026
First Hearing Date: 21st February 2026
Court Number And Judge: 768-Judicial Magistrate First Class NI Act-02

    Orders

    6
    Interim Order 3
    27 Jun 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 40 CC NI ACT / 652/2026
Keshav Kumar Mishra Vs. Ankit Nath
27.06.2026
Present: Sh. N.K. Jha, Ld. Counsel for complainant.
None for accused.
An application for amendment of complaint and legal demant notice has
been filed on behalf of complainant. Amendment/rectification of legal demand notice
is not tenable is law.
One last opportunity is given to the complainant to file appropriate
citiations in favour of his case.
Put up for clarifications on 29.08.2026.
(Shraddha Tripathi)
JMFC-02 (NI Act),
East /KKD/27.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    06 Jun 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 116 CC NI ACT / 652/2026
Keshav Kumar Mishra Vs. Ankit Nath
06.06.2026
Present: Sh. N.K. Jha, Ld. Counsel for complainant.
None for accused.
Put up for clarifications qua the demand in the legal demand notice on
27.06.2026.
(Shraddha Tripathi)
JMFC-02 (NI Act),
East /KKD/06.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    21 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 51 CC NI ACT / 652/2026 Keshav Kumar Mishra Vs. Ankit Nath /0 ()
21.02.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. Let it be checked and registered as
per rules.
Present: None.
Perusal of the cheques in question reflect that the cheque amount is
higher than the amount demanded in the legal demand notice.
Accordingly, complainant is directed to provide clarifications on the
maintainability of the complaint.
Put up on 06.06.2026.
(Shraddha Tripathi)
JMFC-02 (NI Act),
East /KKD/21.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    27 Jun 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 40 CC NI ACT / 652/2026
Keshav Kumar Mishra Vs. Ankit Nath
27.06.2026
Present: Sh. N.K. Jha, Ld. Counsel for complainant.
None for accused.
An application for amendment of complaint and legal demant notice has
been filed on behalf of complainant. Amendment/rectification of legal demand notice
is not tenable is law.
One last opportunity is given to the complainant to file appropriate
citiations in favour of his case.
Put up for clarifications on 29.08.2026.
(Shraddha Tripathi)
JMFC-02 (NI Act),
East /KKD/27.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    06 Jun 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 116 CC NI ACT / 652/2026
Keshav Kumar Mishra Vs. Ankit Nath
06.06.2026
Present: Sh. N.K. Jha, Ld. Counsel for complainant.
None for accused.
Put up for clarifications qua the demand in the legal demand notice on
27.06.2026.
(Shraddha Tripathi)
JMFC-02 (NI Act),
East /KKD/06.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    21 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 51 CC NI ACT / 652/2026 Keshav Kumar Mishra Vs. Ankit Nath /0 ()
21.02.2026
Fresh case received by way of assignment. Let it be checked and registered as
per rules.
Present: None.
Perusal of the cheques in question reflect that the cheque amount is
higher than the amount demanded in the legal demand notice.
Accordingly, complainant is directed to provide clarifications on the
maintainability of the complaint.
Put up on 06.06.2026.
(Shraddha Tripathi)
JMFC-02 (NI Act),
East /KKD/21.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.